공공보건의료체계 발전 방안에 대한 상대적 중요도 분석
Analyzing the Relative Importance for the Development Plan of the Public Health Care System
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate empirically through a specialist AHP analysis what factors should be more important in the development of the public health care system. In addition, we will use Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for experts to achieve research purpose. Methods: The data analysis method of this study is as follows. First, we set up three metrics in order to measure the relative importance between the factors to be improved for the development of the public health care system and each of the sub-factors. A total of nine measurements (items) were set by combining the three measurement criteria for each measurement index. Second, the relative importance and priority analysis use the AHP analysis. Third, the subjects of this study were 15 experts in the field of public health care. The statistical processing was performed using the Expert Choice 2000 statistical program. Results: In order to development of the public health care system, experts ranked the most important as improvement in the systematic aspect of public health care (56%) as the first priority. Next, the relative importance analysis of the measurement items considering the multipleweights of the sub-factors is as follows. The strengthen institutional improvement (revitalization of secondary public function hospital) was the number one, strengthen cooperation between agencies was the second, and Re-establishing the role of local public health care system was the third place. Conclusions: Considering the relative importance, factors that are considered to be important in the first place may not be improved as the best policy alternative due to limitations in spatial, temporal, financial, and institutional aspects. In this case, we suggest that we should choose the best policy alternative by using prioritization considering relative weights.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate empirically through a specialist AHP analysis what factors should be more important in the development of the public health care system. In addition, we will use Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for experts to achieve research purpose. Methods: The data analysis method of this study is as follows. First, we set up three metrics in order to measure the relative importance between the factors to be improved for the development of the public health care system and each of the sub-factors. A total of nine measurements (items) were set by combining the three measurement criteria for each measurement index. Second, the relative importance and priority analysis use the AHP analysis. Third, the subjects of this study were 15 experts in the field of public health care. The statistical processing was performed using the Expert Choice 2000 statistical program. Results: In order to development of the public health care system, experts ranked the most important as improvement in the systematic aspect of public health care (56%) as the first priority. Next, the relative importance analysis of the measurement items considering the multipleweights of the sub-factors is as follows. The strengthen institutional improvement (revitalization of secondary public function hospital) was the number one, strengthen cooperation between agencies was the second, and Re-establishing the role of local public health care system was the third place. Conclusions: Considering the relative importance, factors that are considered to be important in the first place may not be improved as the best policy alternative due to limitations in spatial, temporal, financial, and institutional aspects. In this case, we suggest that we should choose the best policy alternative by using prioritization considering relative weights.
참고문헌 (17)
- 손종칠, "인구고령화의 경제적 영향 및 정책과제", 한국경제연구, 34(2), pp.153~191 (2016), 한국경제연구학회
- 서윤석, "한국 노인 식사의 탄수화물 에너지비와 채소섭취 빈도에 기초한 만성질환위험성 평가: 2007-2009년 국민건강영양조사 자료 이용", 대한지역사회영양학회지, 20(1), pp.41~52 (2015), 대한지역사회영양학회
- 이용재, "한국 의료보장제도 의료비 부담과 가족소득 불평등의 관계", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 16(8), pp.366~375 (2016), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Kang PS, "Improvement of public health services in Korea", J Agr Med Community Health, 25(2), pp.217~230 (2000)
- 박정한, "지방자치시대의 공공보건사업 발전 전략", 보건행정학회지, 12(3), pp.1~22 (2002), 한국보건행정학회
- 황은정, "공공병원의 공공보건의료사업 교육프로그램 개발을 위한 담당자들의 교육요구도", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 41(3), pp.393~402 (2011), 한국간호과학회
- 배상수, "<종설> 신 공중보건과 국가공중보건체계", 농촌의학.지역보건, 37(4), pp.195~214 (2012), 한국농촌의학.지역보건학회
- Oh YH, "Problem with and policy agenda for public health services in Korea", Health Welfare Policy Forum, 200, pp.62~82 (2013)
- Gam S, "Public health care: current status and improvement options", Health Welfare Policy Forum, 169, pp.38~44 (2010)
- Han CH, "A study of design attributes for specialization at medical health service design of public hospital", J Dig Design, 15(2), pp.257~266 (2015)
- Jeong HS, "Efficiency of public hospitals and their social role", Korean J Health Policy Adm, 6(2), pp.1~13 (1996)
- 심인옥, "공공보건의료사업 수행과 주민특성이 공공병원 이미지에 미치는 영향", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 16(9), pp.6089~6098 (2015), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Seok KH, "Functional reorganization of public health center for strengthening public health care", Healthcare Policy Forum, 14(1), pp.22~24 (2016)
- Ahn DT, "Study on improving the connection system among public medical institution; focusing on the city of Chuncheon", Graduate School of Information science and Public Administration, pp.2012
- Saaty TL, "The analytic hierarchy process: a new appoach to deal with fuzziness in architecture", Sci Rev, 23(3), pp.64~68 (1982)
- Lee JE, "A study of the objective hierarchy system and effectiveness evaluation of man-made disaster management policy in Korea", J Modern Soc Public Adm, 13(1), pp.49~72 (2003)
- Lee SY, "Private medical institutions public health enhancement policy, medical privatization policy", Welfare Trends, 160, pp.34~37 (2012)