AHP를 이용한 공공병원 평가지표의 우선순위 및 가중치 개발
Priority Analysis of Criteria for Evaluation of Public Hospital Using Analytic Hierarchy Process
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study looks at priorities in managing public hospitals by figuring out categories needed to examine the quality of each hospital. In order to analyze priorities and relative importance of valuation indicator in Seoul municipal hospitals, surveys were sent via e-mail to medical professionals who have participated in evaluation of municipal hospitals. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was conducted using the Expert Choice 11.5 program. The results show that ‘providing public service’ is considered to be the most important category for all kinds of public hospitals, followed by ‘improving the quality of medical care,’ ‘hospital management and governance,’ and ‘efficient hospital management.’ The importance of ‘hospital management and governance’ and ‘efficient hospital management’ is different depending on the types of hospitals, but the importance of ‘providing public service’ and ‘improving the quality of care’ remains the same regardless of the types of hospitals. Based on these results, the study comes to a conclusion that public hospitals should place high value on certain categories and their management purposes should differ depending on their specific fields and characteristics. This study will help furthering discussions on the identity and roles of public hospitals.
Abstract
This study looks at priorities in managing public hospitals by figuring out categories needed to examine the quality of each hospital. In order to analyze priorities and relative importance of valuation indicator in Seoul municipal hospitals, surveys were sent via e-mail to medical professionals who have participated in evaluation of municipal hospitals. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was conducted using the Expert Choice 11.5 program. The results show that ‘providing public service’ is considered to be the most important category for all kinds of public hospitals, followed by ‘improving the quality of medical care,’ ‘hospital management and governance,’ and ‘efficient hospital management.’ The importance of ‘hospital management and governance’ and ‘efficient hospital management’ is different depending on the types of hospitals, but the importance of ‘providing public service’ and ‘improving the quality of care’ remains the same regardless of the types of hospitals. Based on these results, the study comes to a conclusion that public hospitals should place high value on certain categories and their management purposes should differ depending on their specific fields and characteristics. This study will help furthering discussions on the identity and roles of public hospitals.
참고문헌 (21)
- 남은우, "공공의료기관의 공공성과 수익성 상호관계에 대한 연구", 병원경영학회지, 12(2), pp.43~68 (2007), 한국병원경영학회
- 김용태, "지방의료원의 운영형태별 성과평가에 관한 연구", 정책분석평가학회보, 19(4), pp.233~256 (2009), 한국정책분석평가학회
- A Study on Public Medical Service Provided by Public and Private Medical Institutions, "R.I. Hwang", National Health Insurance Cooperation, 25~31 (2008)
- M. Y. Min, "A Study on Management Evaluation of Regional Medical Institutes", pp.2004
- J.H. Hibbard, "Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?", Health Affairs, 22(2), pp.84~94 (2003)
- H. Shipton, "The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance", International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(6), pp.439~445 (2008)
- The Current State and Problems of Performance Examination Systems for Public Organizations, "M. J. Park", National Assembly Research Service, 48~51 (2010)
- A Study on Development of Evaluation Indicators for Hospital of Seoul Metropolitan City, "J.S. Shim", Seoul Medical Center, 27~30 (2011)
- "Examining Performance of Major Local Public Hospitals and a Statement by Medical Labor’s Unions Regarding Prescriptions" (2012)[URL]
- J. T. Gu, "A Study on Changes in South Korea’s Education Policies", 박사, pp.1994
- Ways to Specify the Roles of Hospitals Associated with National Universities in Public Health Care, "J.R. Lee", Seoul National University Hospital, 7~26 (2011)
- The Current State and Desired Roles of Public Hospitals: Data on Debates on Improving Public Health Care in Seoul City, "J. S. Lee", The Medical Management Department at the Medical School of Seoul National University, 9~25 (2013)
- M. S. Yoo, "The current state of evaluation systems for hospitals and suggestions", Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, 6(2), pp.12~19 (2012)
- Data on Debates for Improving Human Rights of the Mentally Disabled, "The National Committee on Human Rights", The National Committee on Human Rights, 36~43 (2010)
- J. M. Bryson, "Strategic Planning for Public Service and Non-Profit Organizations", pp.1~576 (2004), Jossey-Bass
- Problem and Policy Agenda for Public Health Service in Korea, Health-welfare Policy Forum, "Y. H. Oh", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 62~82 (2013)
- Improving the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients: Reductions on Hospital Bills, "Korea Health Industry Development Institute", Korea Health Industry Development Institute, 30~51 (2011)
- The Demand and Supply of Major Medical Equipments and Policy Recommendations, "Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 15~16 (2009)
- 이상규, "우리나라 고가 의료장비 현황과 정책대안: 정책의 수직적, 수평적 동기화", 대한의사협회지, 55(10), pp.950~958 (2012), 대한의사협회
- 이원영, "한 광역자치도에서 국립대병원과 지방의료원간 협력체계 구축 사례의 성립 요인 및 과정평가", 보건의료산업학회지, 6(4), pp.219~229 (2012), 보건의료산업학회
- 이창은, "지방의료원의 흑·적자 구분별 경영성과요인", 보건의료산업학회지, 4(1), pp.99~110 (2010), 보건의료산업학회