본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

계층 분석적 의사결정 방법(AHP)에 의한 건강도시 사업 평가기준의 우선순위 결정에 관한 연구

A Study of Priority Setting of Healthy City Project Indicators with the use of AHP Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: Since 2000 interests in Healthy City Project has been growing fast in Korea. Amid this atmosphere, the need for establishing priorities when planning Healthy City Project and carrying forward the plan has arisen. Therefore, this study tries to conduct practical research on the manner of setting priorities of business valuation standard about Healthy City Project. Methods: The research was carried out with Healthy City experts and government official. And in this research the responses of 28 participants among 37 have been taken into consideration due to their consistent responses. Results: The results of Level 1 showed that the "social & environmental approach" accounted for more than the "individual approach". In the case of Level 2, fields resulted in order of "environment", "infrastructure", "behavior", "evaluation and reflection", "disease prevention and rehabilitation", and "setting approach". Conclusions: The findings derived from this study are first, it is feasible to suggest the ways of establishing priorities as to the evaluation standards for the Healthy City Project and second, the results present the ways to proceed in terms of what tasks should be done for the healthy City Project development.

Abstract

Objectives: Since 2000 interests in Healthy City Project has been growing fast in Korea. Amid this atmosphere, the need for establishing priorities when planning Healthy City Project and carrying forward the plan has arisen. Therefore, this study tries to conduct practical research on the manner of setting priorities of business valuation standard about Healthy City Project. Methods: The research was carried out with Healthy City experts and government official. And in this research the responses of 28 participants among 37 have been taken into consideration due to their consistent responses. Results: The results of Level 1 showed that the "social & environmental approach" accounted for more than the "individual approach". In the case of Level 2, fields resulted in order of "environment", "infrastructure", "behavior", "evaluation and reflection", "disease prevention and rehabilitation", and "setting approach". Conclusions: The findings derived from this study are first, it is feasible to suggest the ways of establishing priorities as to the evaluation standards for the Healthy City Project and second, the results present the ways to proceed in terms of what tasks should be done for the healthy City Project development.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 강영호, "사망률에서의 사회경제적 불평등 : 조사의 사망 추적 결과(1998-2002)", 한국노동패널, 5 (2004)
  2. 김두섭, "사망력 수주의 시·군별 편차 및 그 변화추이, 1990~2000", 한국인구학, 26(1), pp.1~30 (2003), 한국인구학회
  3. 김승곤, "사회경제적 지위가 노인 건강에 미치는 영향", 사회과학논총, 19(2), pp.17~29 (2004)
  4. 김춘배, "지역보건 관련 소지역간 건강증진지표 개발에 관한 연구", 보건교육·건강증진학회지, 20(1), pp.19~39 (2003), 한국보건교육ㆍ건강증진학회
  5. 김혜련, "건강수준의 사회계층간 차이와 정책방향" (2004), 한국보건사회연구원
  6. 남은우, "건강도시지표 비교를 통한 건강도시 수준의 평가", 보건행정학회지, 16(2), pp.1~20 (2006), 한국보건행정학회
  7. 남은우, "WHO건강도시 원주 발전 5개년 계획" (2006), 연세대학교 의료복지연구소 건강도시연구센터
  8. 이창효, "집단의사결정론", pp.256~257 (2000), 세종출판사
  9. 조근태, "앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정" (2003), 동현출판사
  10. Dahlgren, Whitehead M, "Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health" (1991), Institute for Future Studies
  11. Green L.W, "Health education and health promotion. In:Handbook of Health, Health care, and the health professions" (1983), The Free Press
  12. Hancock, T, ""Promoting health in the urban context", Healthy Cities Series" (1988), FADL
  13. Lalonde M. A, "New Perspective on the health of Canadians" (1975), Ministry of Supply and Services
  14. M. D. Hayward, "Inequality in Men's Mortality: The Socioeconomic Status Gradient And Geographic Context", Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, pp.313~330 (1997)
  15. MCGinnis J M, "Foege W H. Actual causes of death in the United States", JAMA, 270(18), pp.2207~12 (1993)
  16. Saaty, Thomas L. A, "Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures", journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), pp.234~281 (1977)
  17. Saaty, Thomas L, "Decision Making for Leader: The AHP for Decisions in a Complex World" (1982), Wadsworth
  18. WHO, "Ottawa Charter for health promotion", Journal of Health Promotion, 1, pp.1~4 (1986)
  19. WHO Euro, "Twenty steps for developing a Healthy Cities project 3rd Edition" (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)