군 인공지능 면접의 기술 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐구와 현상학적 분석 : 초급간부를 중심으로

키워드

참고문헌 (81)

1. Althuizen, N., "Using structural technology acceptance models to segment intended users of a new technology : Propositions and an empirical illustration", Information Systems Journal, 28(5), pp.879~904 (2018)
2. Babbie, E. R., "The practice of social research", Cengage AU, ~ (2020)
3. Balakrishnan, J., "The role of meta-UTAUT factors, perceived anthropomorphism, perceived intelligence, and social self-efficacy in chatbot-based services?", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, pp.121692~ (2022)
4. Bartneck, C., "Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots", International journal of social robotics, 1(1), pp.71~81 (2009)
5. Benjamin, R., "Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code" (2019), John Wiley & Sons
6. Berthon, P., "Brand management in small to medium-sized enterprises", Journal of small business management, 46(1), pp.27~45 (2008)
7. Blut, M., "Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision : a meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(4), pp.632~658 (2021)
8. Bostrom, N., "How long before superintelligence", International Journal of Futures Studies, 2(2003), pp.12~17 (1998)
9. Brynjolfsson, E., "The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies" (2014), WW Norton & Company
10. Bucy, E. P., "Interactivity in society : Locating an elusive concept", The information society, 20(5), pp.373~383 (2004)
11. Caliskan, A., "Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases", Science, 356(6334), pp.183~186 (2017)
12. Cha, E., "Perceived robot capability", 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp.541~548 (2015), IEEE
13. Charmaz, K., "Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis" (2006), sage
14. Chopdar, P. K., "Mobile shopping apps adoption and perceived risks: A cross-country perspective utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology", Computers in Human Behavior, 86, pp.109~128 (2018)
15. Chui, M., "Where machines could replace humans-and where they can’t (yet)", ~ (2016)
16. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences, "Creswell, J. W.", National Institutes of Health, 541~545, pp.National Institutes of Health, 2013 (2011)
17. Edwards, C., "Initial interaction expectations with robots : Testing the human-to-human interaction script", Communication Studies, 67(2), pp.227~238 (2016)
18. Epley, N., "On seeing human : a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism", Psychological review, 114(4), pp.864~ (2007)
19. Floridi, L., "On the morality of artificial agents", Minds and machines, 14, pp.349~379 (2004)
20. Gefen, D., "Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model", MIS quarterly, pp.51~90 (2003)
21. Giorgi, A., "Phenomenology" (2003), Sage Publications, Inc
22. Glaser, B. G., "Discovery of grounded theory:Strategies for qualitative research" (2017), Routledge
23. Go, H., "Machine learning of robots in tourism and hospitality : interactive technology acceptance model(iTAM)–cutting edge", Tourism review, 75(4), pp.625~636 (2020)
24. Gursoy, D., "Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent(AI)device use in service delivery", International Journal of Information Management, 49, pp.157~169 (2019)
25. Hancock, P. A., "Individuation : The N = 1 revolution", Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 10, pp.481~488 (2009)
26. Hancock, P. A., "A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction", Human Factors, 53(5), pp.517~527 (2011)
27. Hossain, L., "Exploring user acceptance of technology using social networks", The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20(1), pp.1~18 (2009)
28. Ivaldi, S., "Towards engagement models that consider individual factors in HRI : on the relation of extroversion and negative attitude towards robots to gaze and speech during a human–robot assembly task : experiments with the iCub humanoid", International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(1), pp.63~86 (2017)
29. Jung, Y., "Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots", Proceedings of PRESENCE, 2004, pp.80~87 (2004)
30. Kanda, T., "Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial", Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1-2), pp.61~84 (2004)
31. Kang Min-ah, "An exploratory study on the applicability of integrated research methods : integrated application of survey and focus group methods to survey residents' opinions for local health policy decisions", Korean Public Administration Review, 41(4), pp.415~437 (2007)
32. Kelman, H. C., "Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change", Journal of conflict resolution, 2(1), pp.51~60 (1958)
33. Khosravi, H., "Explainable artificial intelligence in education", Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence, 3, pp.100074~ (2022)
34. Kim, H. Y., "Minions for the rich? Financial status changes how consumers see products with anthropomorphic features", Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), pp.429~450 (2018)
35. Kim Yune-jung, "A Study on How to Teach Speech Communication to Prepare for an AI Interview", HAN-GEUL, 82(4), pp.1101~1139 (2021)[DOI]
36. Komatsu, T., "How Does the Difference Between Users’ Expectations and Perceptions About a Robotic Agent Affect Their Behavior? An Adaptation Gap Concept for Determining Whether Interactions Between Users and Agents Are Going Well or Not", International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), pp.109~116 (2012)
37. Korukonda, A. R., "Personality, individual characteristics, and predisposition to technophobia: some answers, questions, and points to ponder about", Information Sciences, 170(2-4), pp.309~328 (2005)
38. Kwon, M., "Human expectations of social robots", 2016 11th ACM, 2016, 463~464[DOI]
39. Latané, B., "The psychology of social impact", American psychologist, 36(4), pp.343~ (1981)
40. Lee, K. M., "Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents? : The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human–robot interaction", International journal of human-computer studies, 64(10), pp.962~973 (2006)
41. Lee Eunji, "“Hey Kakao!”: A Qualitative study on the Interaction between AI devices and its Consumer", Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 21(1), pp.21~53 (2020)
42. Measures to promote public value in the public sector talent recruitment process using Artificial Intelligence (AI), "Lee Hwanseong", National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences, ~ (2023)
43. Lohse, M., "New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction", pp.35~56 (2009)
44. Lu, L., "Developing and validating a service robot integration willingness scale", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, pp.36~51 (2019)
45. Matthews, M. J., "Just a number? Using artificial intelligence to explore perceived founder age in entrepreneurial fundraising", Journal of Business Venturing, 39(1), pp.106361~ (2021)
46. McLeod, S. A, "Simply Psychology" (2007)
47. Meuter, M. L., "Choosing among alternative service delivery modes : An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies", Journal of marketing, 69(2), pp.61~83 (2005)
48. Mittelstadt, B. D., "The ethics of algorithms : Mapping the debate", Big Data &Society, 3(2), pp.2053951716679679~ (2016)
49. Moon, Y., "Intimate self-disclosure exhanges: Using computers to build reciprocal relationships with consumers" (1998), Division of Research, Harvard Business School
50. Morse, J. M., "Mixed method design: Principles and procedures (Vol. 4)" (2016), Routledge
51. Olson, R. S., "A system for accessible artificial intelligence. In Genetic programming theory and practice XV", pp.121~134 (2018), Springer International Publishing
52. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., "On becoming a pragmatic researcher : The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies", International journal of social research methodology, 8(5), pp.375~387 (2005)
53. O. Pappas, I., "Moderating effects of online shopping experience on customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions", International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(3), pp.187~204 (2014)
54. Paepcke, S., "Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots", 2010 5th ACM, 2010, 45~52[DOI]
55. Parasuraman, A., "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research", Journal of marketing, 49(4), pp.41~50 (1985)
56. Park Hyunah, "Expectation and Expectation Gap towards intelligent properties of AI-based Conversational Agent", Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 14(1), pp.15~22 (2019)[DOI]
57. Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative evaluation and research methods" (1990), SAGE Publications, inc
58. Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative research & evaluation methods:Integrating theory and practice" (2014), Sage publications
59. Pavlou, P. A., "Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior", MIS quarterly, pp.115~143 (2006)
60. Rai, A., "Understanding determinants of consumer mobile health usage intentions, assimilation, and channel preferences", Journal of medical Internet research, 15(8), pp.e149~ (2013)
61. Rauschnabel, P. A., "Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables", Computers in Human Behavior, 49, pp.635~647 (2015)
62. Rogers, C. R., "On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy" (1995), Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
63. Ross, J. M., "Moderators of trust and reliance across multiple decision aids" (2008), university of central florida
64. Russell, S. J., "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach" (2016)
65. Schaefer, K. E., "A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation : Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems", Human factors, 58(3), pp.377~400 (2016)
66. Selbst, A. D., "The intuitive appeal of explainable machines", Fordham L. Rev, 87, pp.1085~ (2018)
67. Soleimani, M., "Cognitive biases in developing biased Artificial Intelligence recruitment system", ~ (2021)
68. Stromer-Galley, J., "Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process", The Information Society, 20(5), pp.391~394 (2004)
69. Suri, H., "Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis", Qualitative research journal, 11(2), pp.63~75 (2011)
70. Taddeo, M., "How AI can be a force for good", Science, 361(6404), pp.751~752 (2018)
71. Taniguchi, M., "Combining machine learning and nanopore construction creates an artificial intelligence nanopore for coronavirus detection", Nature communications, 12(1), pp.3726~ (2021)
72. Teddlie, C., "Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences" (2009), Sage
73. Thomas, L., "Power, assumptions and prescriptions : a critique of widening participation policy-making", Higher Education Policy, 14(4), pp.361~376 (2001)
74. Tinwell, A., "Nonverbal Communication in Virtual Worlds", pp.325~341 (2014)
75. Tong, X., "A cross-national investigation of an extended technology acceptance model in the online shopping context", International Journal of retail & distribution management, 38(10), pp.742~759 (2010)
76. Venkatesh, V., "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model : Four longitudinal field studies", Management science, 46(2), pp.186~204 (2000)
77. Venkatesh, V., "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view", MIS quarterly, pp.425~478 (2003)
78. Venkatesh, V., "Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology", MIS quarterly, pp.157~178 (2012)
79. Yi, Y., "Customer value co-creation behavior : Scale development and validation", Journal of Business research, 66(9), pp.1279~1284 (2013)
80. Yin, R. K., "Case study research and applications (Vol. 6)" (2018), Sage
81. Yu Min-bong, "A qualitative study on the face phenomenon and behavior experienced by public officials in organizational life : Applying Grounded Theory", Korean Public Administration Review, 45(1), pp.199~225 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천