러일전쟁 이전 러시아의 동아시아정책
Russia’s East Asia Policy Prior to the Russo-Japanese War
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes the transition of Russia's East Asia policy after the outbreak of Uihwadan(Boxer Rebellion). From July of 1900 to Oct. 6, 1900 Russia occupied Manchuria by means of Military force and attempted to deny criticism from world powers by referencing Alekseyev-Tseng Chi Treaty and Ramsdorf-Yangyu Treaty, which all failed. Also, the ‘7 demands', written by Vitte, Ramsdorf, Kuropatkin, and Ressar, was rejected as well. That is to seek the diplomatic solution of Russia's interest in East Asia, especially in Manchuria, was unsuccessful. This meant Vitte's policy in East Asia was a failure. Following November 1902, Nicolaus the II established the Special Eas Asia Committee as well as Russian Government General of Far East. Also announced so called “New Line”:in May 1903 to encourage his policy. This caused Russia to depend on military force enforcing East Asia. Ultimately, Russia's East Asia policy with imperialistic ravage increased the possibility of a war against Japan significantly.
Abstract
This study analyzes the transition of Russia's East Asia policy after the outbreak of Uihwadan(Boxer Rebellion). From July of 1900 to Oct. 6, 1900 Russia occupied Manchuria by means of Military force and attempted to deny criticism from world powers by referencing Alekseyev-Tseng Chi Treaty and Ramsdorf-Yangyu Treaty, which all failed. Also, the ‘7 demands', written by Vitte, Ramsdorf, Kuropatkin, and Ressar, was rejected as well. That is to seek the diplomatic solution of Russia's interest in East Asia, especially in Manchuria, was unsuccessful. This meant Vitte's policy in East Asia was a failure. Following November 1902, Nicolaus the II established the Special Eas Asia Committee as well as Russian Government General of Far East. Also announced so called “New Line”:in May 1903 to encourage his policy. This caused Russia to depend on military force enforcing East Asia. Ultimately, Russia's East Asia policy with imperialistic ravage increased the possibility of a war against Japan significantly.
참고문헌 (19)
- 말로제모프, "러시아의 동아시아정책", pp.182~ (2002), 지식산업사
- 최덕규, "대한제국과 러시아와의 관계(1896-1906)러시아의 압록강 삼림채벌권 개발 정책을 중심으로", ~
- "한국과 러시아 관계 : 평가와 전망", 경남대 극동문제연구소, ~ (2001)
- 김영수, "러일전쟁 전야 제정러시아의 극동정책", 사림, (22), pp.21~41 (2004), 수선사학회
- Б.А. Романов, "Россия в Маньчжурии, 1892-1906", pp.241~ (1928), Ленинград
- В.В. Глинский, "Пролог Русско-Японской войну: Материалы из архива Графа С.Ю. Витте", pp.111~112 (1916), Петроград
- "Красныйархив, XIV, 36", 알렉세예프의 전문, ~ (1900)
- "Государственный Архив Российской Федерации", ф.543. оп.1. д.182. л.1., ~
- 석화정, "위떼의 대만주정책 점령기 청과의 비밀 교섭을 중심으로", 서양사론, (55), pp.203~224
- "ГАРФ", ф.543. оп.1. д.182. л.4., ~
- А. Галперин, "Англо-Японский союз, 1902-1921 г", pp.63~64 (1947), Москва
- Б.А. Романов, "Россия в Маньчжурии", 303~
- Б.А. Романов, "Очерки дипломатическойисторий Русско-Японской Войну, 1895-1907", pp.451~455 (1947), Москва
- Б.А. Романов, "Россия в Маньчжурии", 386~387
- D.S. Crist, "Russia's Far Eastern in the", Journal of Modern History, 14(2), pp.326~ (1942)
- "D.S. Crist", Ibid, 328~
- "Malozemoff", op.cit.,, ~
- "Российский Государственный Архив Военно-Морской Флот", ф.417. оп.1. д.2303. лл.107-118об, ~
- "Красный архив, LII", 110~124