본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

鄭寅普가 구성한 조선후기 문화사

Cultural History of the Latter Half of Chosǒn Dynasty Organized by Jung, In-bo

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Jung, In Bo was mostly devoted to doing research on national studies(國學) while being affected by the trend of modern nationalism such as Zhang Byung-rin, Yang, Gye-cho, Wang Yang-myung, etc. But he also had a learning background centered upon Soron(少論)'s academic tradition. To completely understand his national studies, we have to grasp the meaning of unique learning system of Soron and Sobuk(小北) political faction in the latter half of Chosǒn Dynasty. Among a great number of scholars of the Chinese classics with background of traditional learning, his learning background couldn't be ignored that had led Jung, In Bo to successful performance. Even though Soron's learning system related to modern national studies was not bigger than that of Japan, it had many functions in common that could be united into discourse about modern nationalism that emphasized the nation. Soron's learning system focused upon issues of national territory, righteousness between sovereign and subject. keeping up with respecting national order. In addition, even though it was different from the goal in modern times, it did research on Hunminjeongeum(Korean Alphabet), while making the society develop ideology of unification using tangpyung(蕩平) policy. This kind of learning background enabled Jung, In Bo to successfully respond to contemporary intellectual trend changed at the time as a scholar of the Chinese classics. I assume that academic tradition of Soron faction played a significant role in his absorbing research tradition of study of culture and heritage of the country of China and Japan. The purpose of this study is to find out medieval possibilities of modern nationalism that were shown in the learning of Soron and investigate how it was changed and inherited to Jung, In Bo. From the viewpoint of Jung, In Bo, I believe that he tried to design 'nation state' that played the most important factor in the formation of modern nation and gain independence more than anything else. That's the reason which he paid attention to separating his side from others. In that way of his separation of his side from others, he was committed to carrying out a clear historic task that he should protect Korean nation of a historic community from the Japanese control. That point was the place which he changed medieval studying of Soron faction into modern national studies.

Abstract

Jung, In Bo was mostly devoted to doing research on national studies(國學) while being affected by the trend of modern nationalism such as Zhang Byung-rin, Yang, Gye-cho, Wang Yang-myung, etc. But he also had a learning background centered upon Soron(少論)'s academic tradition. To completely understand his national studies, we have to grasp the meaning of unique learning system of Soron and Sobuk(小北) political faction in the latter half of Chosǒn Dynasty. Among a great number of scholars of the Chinese classics with background of traditional learning, his learning background couldn't be ignored that had led Jung, In Bo to successful performance. Even though Soron's learning system related to modern national studies was not bigger than that of Japan, it had many functions in common that could be united into discourse about modern nationalism that emphasized the nation. Soron's learning system focused upon issues of national territory, righteousness between sovereign and subject. keeping up with respecting national order. In addition, even though it was different from the goal in modern times, it did research on Hunminjeongeum(Korean Alphabet), while making the society develop ideology of unification using tangpyung(蕩平) policy. This kind of learning background enabled Jung, In Bo to successfully respond to contemporary intellectual trend changed at the time as a scholar of the Chinese classics. I assume that academic tradition of Soron faction played a significant role in his absorbing research tradition of study of culture and heritage of the country of China and Japan. The purpose of this study is to find out medieval possibilities of modern nationalism that were shown in the learning of Soron and investigate how it was changed and inherited to Jung, In Bo. From the viewpoint of Jung, In Bo, I believe that he tried to design 'nation state' that played the most important factor in the formation of modern nation and gain independence more than anything else. That's the reason which he paid attention to separating his side from others. In that way of his separation of his side from others, he was committed to carrying out a clear historic task that he should protect Korean nation of a historic community from the Japanese control. That point was the place which he changed medieval studying of Soron faction into modern national studies.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 徐知英, "朝鮮時代 黑釉磁 硏究", 석사, pp.2007
  2. 이상호, "韓國 近代 陽明學의 哲學的 特徵 - 朴殷植과 鄭寅普를 中心으로 -", 양명학, 20(20), pp.151~188 (2008), 한국양명학회
  3. 김영봉, "爲堂 鄭寅普의 墓道文字에 나타난 시대 의식", 동방학지, (141), pp.51~81 (2008), 국학연구원
  4. 한정길, "鄭寅普의 陽明學觀에 대한 연구", 동방학지, (141), pp.83~120 (2008), 국학연구원
  5. 이만열, "爲堂 鄭寅普의 韓國 古代史 認識", 동방학지, (141), pp.1~49 (2008), 국학연구원
  6. 최재목, "鄭寅普 ‘陽明學’ 형성의 知形圖 - ‘世界’와의 ‘호흡’, 그 重層性과 관련하여-", 동방학지, (143), pp.25~52 (2008), 국학연구원
  7. 최재목, "金台俊의 「鄭寅普論」을 통해 본 解放前 爲堂 鄭寅普에 대한 評價", 양명학, (20), pp.83~121 (2008), 한국양명학회
  8. 신현승, "鄭寅普의 눈에 비친 中國 明末淸初期의 知識人", 동서철학연구, (48), pp.367~391 (2008), 한국동서철학회
  9. 최재목, "鄭寅普『陽明學演論』에 나타난 王龍溪 이해", 양명학, (16), pp.45~82 (2006), 한국양명학회
  10. 최재목, "鄭寅普의 陽明學 이해", 양명학, (17), pp.95~120 (2006), 한국양명학회
  11. 안장리, "인문학적 사유를 바탕으로 한 장르변형 글쓰기 -鄭寅普의 {唐陵君遺事徵}-", 동방학지, (130), pp.279~304 (2005), 국학연구원
  12. 이상호, "정인보 實心論의 양명좌파적 특징", 양명학, (15), pp.199~228 (2005), 한국양명학회
  13. 이황직, "위당 정인보의 유교적 개혁주의 사상", 한국사상사학, (20), pp.287~325 (2003), 한국사상사학회
  14. 심경호, "강화학과 담원 정인보", 어문연구, 107 (2000)
  15. 이상호, "정인보의 얼사관", 동양철학, 12 (2000)
  16. 최영성, "일제시기 반식민사학의 전개-신채호, 정인보, 문일평, 안재홍, 백남운을 중심으로", 한국사상과 문화, 9 (2000)
  17. 정진석, "정인보의 언론을 통한 민족정신 고취", 어문연구, 107 (2000)
  18. 남궁효, "정인보의 조선학 이론에 관한 연구", 실학사상연구, 8 (1996)
  19. 이완재, "정인보의 한국사 인식", 韓國思想史學, 4 (1993)
  20. 박성수, "爲堂 鄭寅普의 檀君文化論", 東洋學, 18 (1988)
  21. 민영규, "爲堂 鄭寅普 先生의 行狀에 나타난 몇 가지 문제: 實學原始", 東方學志, 13 (1972)
  22. 허경진, "정원용 관련 저술해제집" (2009), 보고사
  23. 조성산, "조선후기 소론계의 古代史 연구와 中華主義의 변용", 역사학보, (202), pp.49~90 (2009), 역사학회
  24. 鄭寅普, "薝園鄭寅普全集 6", pp.6~ (1983), 연세대학교 출판부
  25. 정양완, "강화학파의 문학과 사상(1)" (1993), 한국정신문화연구원
  26. 오수경, "李匡呂의 實學思想과 現實主義 文學世界", 嶠南漢文學, 5 (1993)
  27. 정양원, "江華學派의 文學과 思想(1)" (1993), 한국정신문화연구원
  28. 심경호, "江華學派의 文學과 思想(3)" (1995), 한국정신문화연구원
  29. 서경숙, "初期 江華學派의 陽明學에 關한 硏究", 박사, pp.2000
  30. 강석중, "李匡師 文論 硏究", 석사, pp.1991
  31. 이완우, "員嶠 李匡師의 書藝", 美術史學硏究, pp.190~191 (1991)
  32. 이희목, "영재 이건창의 주체적 자각과 시세계", 한국한문학연구, 8 (1985)
  33. 박준호, "椒園 李忠翊의 生涯와 詩", 漢文學硏究, 9 (1994)
  34. 박준호, "岱淵 李勉伯의 生涯와 文學", 漢文學硏究, 11 (1996)
  35. 박광용, "강화학파의 인물과 사상", 계간황해문화, 10 (1996)
  36. 김기승, "이건창의 생애에 나타난 척사와 개화의 갈등", 인문과학논총, 6 (1998)
  37. 심경호, "19세기 말 20세기 초 강화학파의 지적 고뇌와 문학", 語文論集, 41 (2000)
  38. 박준호, "江華學派의 文學世界에 대한 一考察", 大東漢文學, 14 (2001)
  39. 이희목, "寧齋 李建昌의 陽明學과 文學", 大東漢文學, 14 (2001)
  40. 구만옥, "方便子 柳僖(1773~1837)의 天文曆法論", 韓國史硏究, 113 (2001)
  41. 김학목, "李忠翊의 椒園談老 硏究", 인천학연구, 2(2) (2003)
  42. 鄭寅普, "薝園鄭寅普全集 6󰡕", pp.369~ (1983), 연세대학교 출판부
  43. 정인보, "담원문록 상" (2006), 태학사
  44. "언니(從兄 寅昉)께", 108~
  45. "尹器重 선생이 담원 선생에게 한 서한", 123~124
  46. 鄭寅普, "薝園鄭寅普全集 5", pp.20~ (1983), 연세대학교 출판부
  47. 박종채, "역주 과정록", pp.75~76 (1997), 태학사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)