爲堂 鄭寅普의 墓道文字에 나타난 시대 의식
Consciousness of the Period in Myodomunja(墓道文字) written by Jeong In-bo
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Jeong In-bo (鄭寅普, 1893~1950) has been recognized as an once-in-a- century scholar who left lots of academic achievements in various fields such as literature, history and philosophy in last period of traditional scholarship era. However, since studies on Jeong In-bo have hitherto been inclined to history and philosophy (doctrines of Wang Yangming), there were only few works about his literatures, for instance, theses about his Sijo (Korean Versus). But his fame as a great author had gained in orthodox Chinese classics, not in Korean Versus. Accordingly, there is a necessity of studying on his Chinese classics, which has been neglected until recently. The main purpose of this study is researching and analyzing about Jeong In-bo’s classics to address study imbalances. Most of literary works by Jeong In-bo in Written Chinese are Myodomunja(墓道文字, Epitaph or Tribute to the dead). Jeong In-bo’s works show very obiously his consciousness as a patriot who had lived in end of 19th century, period of Japanese imperialism, and independence of Korea. In his Myodomunja’s, Jeong In-bo had expressed his own rage against the Japanese imperialism and anxiety about future of his country consciously, even considering that the life of the deceased was closely connected with those days. Particularly, we should pay attention to Yuleungjimun (裕陵誌文), which is written by Jeong In-bo when Emperor Sunjong (純宗, 1874~1926) returned to his eternal home. He wrote this literature instead of Yun Yong-gu (尹用求, 1853~1939) who was a Jesulguan (製術官, a position for writing ceremony literature in Chosun Dynasty), however, it wasn’t adopted after all. The tribute to Emperor Sunjong written by Yun Yong-gu himself is included in Sunjongsilrok (純宗實錄), and the it only says that the Jeong In-bo’s work wasn’t adopted because of the <different opinion>. However, it has been believed that the true reason wasconcern about the rubbing Japan the wrong way due to lots of expression showing rage against Japanese imperialism. The truth becomes more obvious by reading Yuleungjimunitself. Jeong In-bo had depicted Emperor Sunjong as the emperor who lived upon wrath against Japan and past away directly and indirectly in his work. The tone of Jeong In-bo is completely different from same of Yun Yong-gu. Yun Yong-gu also hadhis own historical consciousness as he never accepted main post in government several times after Eulmisabyun (乙未事變, Killing of Empress Myungsung by Japanese in 1895) and rejected a title with which Japan graced him after Japanese annexation of Korea. Even though, when Jeong In-bo’s work is compared to Yun Yong-gu’s, it is distinctly that Jeong In-bo had stronger national consciousness than any other one in same period. Beside Yuleungjimun, in his other Myodomunja’s Jeong In-bo admired patriotic life of the main character therein, and also expressed his own deep loyalty to the country. Myodonmunja is the literature suitable to reflect writer’s thought through the main character, since it is tribute to the deceased by looking back on his life. This study observes that Jeong In-bo had made best use of the Myodomunja’s characteristics to express efficiently his patriotic spirit.Key Words:Consciousness of the Period, orthodox Chinese classics, Myodomunja(墓道文字, Epitaph or Tribute to the dead), Yuleungjimun (裕陵誌文)
Abstract
Jeong In-bo (鄭寅普, 1893~1950) has been recognized as an once-in-a- century scholar who left lots of academic achievements in various fields such as literature, history and philosophy in last period of traditional scholarship era. However, since studies on Jeong In-bo have hitherto been inclined to history and philosophy (doctrines of Wang Yangming), there were only few works about his literatures, for instance, theses about his Sijo (Korean Versus). But his fame as a great author had gained in orthodox Chinese classics, not in Korean Versus. Accordingly, there is a necessity of studying on his Chinese classics, which has been neglected until recently. The main purpose of this study is researching and analyzing about Jeong In-bo’s classics to address study imbalances. Most of literary works by Jeong In-bo in Written Chinese are Myodomunja(墓道文字, Epitaph or Tribute to the dead). Jeong In-bo’s works show very obiously his consciousness as a patriot who had lived in end of 19th century, period of Japanese imperialism, and independence of Korea. In his Myodomunja’s, Jeong In-bo had expressed his own rage against the Japanese imperialism and anxiety about future of his country consciously, even considering that the life of the deceased was closely connected with those days. Particularly, we should pay attention to Yuleungjimun (裕陵誌文), which is written by Jeong In-bo when Emperor Sunjong (純宗, 1874~1926) returned to his eternal home. He wrote this literature instead of Yun Yong-gu (尹用求, 1853~1939) who was a Jesulguan (製術官, a position for writing ceremony literature in Chosun Dynasty), however, it wasn’t adopted after all. The tribute to Emperor Sunjong written by Yun Yong-gu himself is included in Sunjongsilrok (純宗實錄), and the it only says that the Jeong In-bo’s work wasn’t adopted because of the <different opinion>. However, it has been believed that the true reason wasconcern about the rubbing Japan the wrong way due to lots of expression showing rage against Japanese imperialism. The truth becomes more obvious by reading Yuleungjimunitself. Jeong In-bo had depicted Emperor Sunjong as the emperor who lived upon wrath against Japan and past away directly and indirectly in his work. The tone of Jeong In-bo is completely different from same of Yun Yong-gu. Yun Yong-gu also hadhis own historical consciousness as he never accepted main post in government several times after Eulmisabyun (乙未事變, Killing of Empress Myungsung by Japanese in 1895) and rejected a title with which Japan graced him after Japanese annexation of Korea. Even though, when Jeong In-bo’s work is compared to Yun Yong-gu’s, it is distinctly that Jeong In-bo had stronger national consciousness than any other one in same period. Beside Yuleungjimun, in his other Myodomunja’s Jeong In-bo admired patriotic life of the main character therein, and also expressed his own deep loyalty to the country. Myodonmunja is the literature suitable to reflect writer’s thought through the main character, since it is tribute to the deceased by looking back on his life. This study observes that Jeong In-bo had made best use of the Myodomunja’s characteristics to express efficiently his patriotic spirit.Key Words:Consciousness of the Period, orthodox Chinese classics, Myodomunja(墓道文字, Epitaph or Tribute to the dead), Yuleungjimun (裕陵誌文)
참고문헌 (19)
- 徐居正, "東文選序, 四佳文集 권24", ~
- 成俔, "與楙功書, 虛白堂文集 권12", ~
- 金宗直, "永嘉連魁集序, 佔畢齋文集 권1", ~
- 이동영, "鄭寅普의 生涯와 文學業績", 陶南學報, 17 (1998), 陶南學會
- 정양완, "薝園文錄" (2006), 태학사
- 안장리, "인문학적 사유를 바탕으로 한 장르변형 글쓰기 -鄭寅普의 {唐陵君遺事徵}-", 동방학지, (130), pp.279~304 (2005), 국학연구원
- 劉師培, "論近世文學之變遷", ~
- 陳必祥, "한문문체론" (1995), 이회
- 심경호, "한문산문의 미학" (1998), 고려대학교 출판부
- "禮記, 祭統", ~
- 曾鞏, "寄歐陽舍人書", ~
- 李奎報, "登仕郞․檢校尙書․戶部侍郞․行尙書都․官員外郞․賜紫金魚袋尹公墓誌銘)", ~
- 李滉, "論李仲虎碣文, 示金而精, 退溪先生文集 卷之二十九", ~
- 權韠, "忠州石, 效白樂天", ~
- 朴浚鎬, "江華學派의 碑誌文字論", 동방한문학, 25, pp.337~360 (2003), 동방한문학회
- 沈慶昊, "江華學과 薝園 鄭寅普", 語文硏究, 28, pp.280~ (2000), 한국어문교육연구회
- "純宗孝皇帝實錄 附錄 十九年 六月", ~
- 徐師曾, "文體明辯, 墓誌銘", ~
- 安秉烈, "退溪碑誌文考察", 퇴계학, (창간), pp.80~ (1989), 안동대 퇴계학연구소
