爲堂 鄭寅普의 韓國 古代史 認識
Wi-Dang Chung-Inbo's View on the Ancient History of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chung-Inbo(1893~1950), born in the late Chosun period and active from the colonial period until the breakout of the Korean war, is a prominent Korean intellectual and Korean studies scholar, who has many publications on Korean history. One of his works, which later turned into Studies on Korean History[Chosunsa-yongoo], was published as a series on the Dong-A Daily under the title, The Five-Thousand-Years Spirit of Chosun. Unlike his original intention, the series came to an end while dealing with the Three Kingdom period. This study aims to generate a summary of his view on Korea's ancient history based on Studies on Korean History. Although he himself denied being a Korean historian, he started studying Korean history after realizing Imperial Japan's malicious attempts to describe Pyongyang as part of ancient China with publication of Illustrated Book of Korean Relics[Chosun-gojukdobo]. Following points could be made as the background reasons of his interest in Korean history. First, as offspring of influential family, he happened to inherit many books that he could later use as material for his study. Second, having Nan-Gok Yi-Geonbang a great scholar as his preceptor, he had quality linguistic training and was well read in a variety of Chinese classics. This enabled him to understand literatures on Korean history that were written mostly in premodern Chinese. Third, he was strongly influenced by nationalist historians such as Dan-Jae Shin-Chaeho, etc., which could explain why he is nowadays considered a representative successor of nationalist historians. What is clear in his view on the history of ancient Korea may be summarized as follows. First, he tried to reason that Dangun was the progenitor of the Korean nation through philology. It is remarkable that he shows special historical research toward record of Dangun in Heritage of Three Kingdoms[Samgook-yusa]. Second, he emphasized Korea's resistance against other nations, e. g., China as a way to critique Imperial Japan's tendency to describe Korea as a passive nation. In doing so, he used philological and archaeological methods to criticize the argument of historical colonialism that views some regions of the Korean peninsula as Chinese colonies. His studies on the ancient history of Korea reveals his excellence in bibliographical methods. It was possible due to his outstanding knowledge of ancient Chinese literature and ability to discover causation therefrom. Many of his works on historical evidence are based not only on literature, but also on archaeological relics. Among the relics that were unearthed near Pyongyang, there were 'sealed clay(bong-ni)' that were inscribed with 'the official seal of Nak-Rang county'(Nak-Rang gwan-in). The Colonialist historians of Imperial Japan refered to this fact as supporting evidence that the Pyongyang area was Nak-Rang County, one of ‘the Four Counties of the Han dynasty'(Han-sa-gun). However, Chung-Inbo refuted this with the following claim. Sealed clay was used to cover document boxes when sending secret documents. Sealed clay inscribed with the official seal would be broken by the recipient. Thus, the area where sealed clay fragments with the official seal were excavated, would indicate the recipient rather than the sender of the document. Therefore, Pyongyang, where clay fragments of the official seal of Nak-Rang County were unearthed, could not be Nak-Rang County but rather was the recipient of documents sent from Nak-Rang. Furthermore, Chung-Inbo's research on the monumental inscription of King Kwang-Gae-To the Great further illustrates his insight on Chinese literature and his extraordinary understanding of the situation of Northeastern Asia. Studies on Korean History, etc. shows the greatness of his scholarship. His intellectual training was based on premodern ways. Yet, his pedagogies were updated enough to teach at one of the most modern universities in Korea. Wi-Dang, being one of those who engaged in missions to confront the historical colonialism of Imperial Japan with counter-evidence, is an important scholar who successfully integrated traditional studies with modern scholarship.
Abstract
Chung-Inbo(1893~1950), born in the late Chosun period and active from the colonial period until the breakout of the Korean war, is a prominent Korean intellectual and Korean studies scholar, who has many publications on Korean history. One of his works, which later turned into Studies on Korean History[Chosunsa-yongoo], was published as a series on the Dong-A Daily under the title, The Five-Thousand-Years Spirit of Chosun. Unlike his original intention, the series came to an end while dealing with the Three Kingdom period. This study aims to generate a summary of his view on Korea's ancient history based on Studies on Korean History. Although he himself denied being a Korean historian, he started studying Korean history after realizing Imperial Japan's malicious attempts to describe Pyongyang as part of ancient China with publication of Illustrated Book of Korean Relics[Chosun-gojukdobo]. Following points could be made as the background reasons of his interest in Korean history. First, as offspring of influential family, he happened to inherit many books that he could later use as material for his study. Second, having Nan-Gok Yi-Geonbang a great scholar as his preceptor, he had quality linguistic training and was well read in a variety of Chinese classics. This enabled him to understand literatures on Korean history that were written mostly in premodern Chinese. Third, he was strongly influenced by nationalist historians such as Dan-Jae Shin-Chaeho, etc., which could explain why he is nowadays considered a representative successor of nationalist historians. What is clear in his view on the history of ancient Korea may be summarized as follows. First, he tried to reason that Dangun was the progenitor of the Korean nation through philology. It is remarkable that he shows special historical research toward record of Dangun in Heritage of Three Kingdoms[Samgook-yusa]. Second, he emphasized Korea's resistance against other nations, e. g., China as a way to critique Imperial Japan's tendency to describe Korea as a passive nation. In doing so, he used philological and archaeological methods to criticize the argument of historical colonialism that views some regions of the Korean peninsula as Chinese colonies. His studies on the ancient history of Korea reveals his excellence in bibliographical methods. It was possible due to his outstanding knowledge of ancient Chinese literature and ability to discover causation therefrom. Many of his works on historical evidence are based not only on literature, but also on archaeological relics. Among the relics that were unearthed near Pyongyang, there were 'sealed clay(bong-ni)' that were inscribed with 'the official seal of Nak-Rang county'(Nak-Rang gwan-in). The Colonialist historians of Imperial Japan refered to this fact as supporting evidence that the Pyongyang area was Nak-Rang County, one of ‘the Four Counties of the Han dynasty'(Han-sa-gun). However, Chung-Inbo refuted this with the following claim. Sealed clay was used to cover document boxes when sending secret documents. Sealed clay inscribed with the official seal would be broken by the recipient. Thus, the area where sealed clay fragments with the official seal were excavated, would indicate the recipient rather than the sender of the document. Therefore, Pyongyang, where clay fragments of the official seal of Nak-Rang County were unearthed, could not be Nak-Rang County but rather was the recipient of documents sent from Nak-Rang. Furthermore, Chung-Inbo's research on the monumental inscription of King Kwang-Gae-To the Great further illustrates his insight on Chinese literature and his extraordinary understanding of the situation of Northeastern Asia. Studies on Korean History, etc. shows the greatness of his scholarship. His intellectual training was based on premodern ways. Yet, his pedagogies were updated enough to teach at one of the most modern universities in Korea. Wi-Dang, being one of those who engaged in missions to confront the historical colonialism of Imperial Japan with counter-evidence, is an important scholar who successfully integrated traditional studies with modern scholarship.
참고문헌 (50)
- 강만길, "일제시대의 반식민사학론, In 한국사학사의 연구" (1985), 을유문화사
- 김기승, "식민지시대 민족주의 사학자들의 연사인식", ~
- 김용섭, "우리나라 역사학의 발달-1930~40년대의 민족사학", 문학과지성, 4 (1971), 문학과지성사
- 김정배, "일제하의 한국고대사 연구가", 현상과인식, 4(1)
- 민영규, "위당정인보선생의 행장에 나타난 몇가지 문제:實學原始", 동방학지, 13 (1972), 연세대
- 민영규, "鄭薝園廣開土境平安好太王陵碑文釋略 校錄幷序", 동방학지, 46.47.48 (1985), 연세대
- 박성수, "위당 정인보의 단군문화론", 동양학, 18 (1988), 단국대학교
- 신형식, "조선사연구, In 한국사학사", pp.373~382 (1999), 삼영사
- 오영교, "정인보, In 한국의 역사가와 역사학 하" (1994), 창작과비평사
- 오영섭, "정인보의 고대사 인식과 민족주의, In 한국 근현대사를 수놓은 인물들 1" (2007), 경인문화사
- 왕현종, "연희전문의 한국사 연구와 민족주의 사학의 전개, In 근대학문의 형성과 연희전문" (2005), 연대출판부
- 연세대학교 국학연구원, "정인보, In 연세국학연구사", pp.344~358 (2005), 연세대학교 출판부
- 이기백, "민족주의사학의 발달, In 민족과 역사" (1978), 일조각
- 이만열, "민족주의사학의 발달", 한국사론, 6 (1981), 국사편찬위원회
- 이만열, "박은식과 정인보, In 한국근대역사학의 이해" (1981), 문학과지성사
- 이상호, "정인보의 얼사관", 동양철학, 12
- 이완재, "정인보의 한국사 인식", 한국사상사학, pp.4~5
- 이이화, "정인보, In 인물한국사" (1988), 한길사
- 정두희, "광개토왕능비문 신묘년 기사의 재검토", 역사학보, 82 (1979)
- 조동걸, "연보를 통해서 본 정인보와 백남운", 한국독립운동사연구, 5 (1991), 한국독립운동사연구소
- 진영일, "위당 정인보의 사학사상", 공주교대논문집, 21 (1985)
- 진영일, "위당 정인보의 고대사인식", 공주교대논총, 22(1) (1986)
- 천관우, "정인보의 사학, In 한국근대사산책" (1986), 정음문화사
- 최지연, "정인보의 고대사인식", 숙명한국사론, (창간) (1993)
- 하현강, "위당 정인보", 계간 연세 진리 자유, (창간) (1989)
- 홍이섭, "위당 정인보 선생과 국학 연구", 연세춘추, 388 (1965)
- 홍이섭, "위당 정인보, In 한국사의 방법" (1968), 탐구당
- 황원구, "정인보, In 한국사시민강좌 19", pp.134~152 (1996), 일조각
- 조동걸, "현대한국사학사", pp.171~174 (1998), 나남출판
- 정인보, "朝鮮史硏究 下" (1947), 서울신문사
- 백낙준, "薝園 鄭寅普全集 序, In 薝園 鄭寅普全集 1" (1983), 연세대학교출판부
- 정인보, "담원문록 중" (2006), 태학사
- 정인보, "朝鮮史硏究 上" (1947), 서울신문사
- 朝鮮總督府朝鮮史編修會, "朝鮮史編修會事業槪要", ~ (1938)
- 정인보, "담원정인보전집 2" (1983), 연세대 출판부
- 이만열, "한국근현대역사학의 흐름" (2007), 푸른역사
- 단재신채호전집편찬위원회, "단재신채호 전집 1" (2007), 독립기념관
- 이병도, "韓國史 古代篇", pp.152~ (1959), 을유문화사
- 국사편찬위원회, "한국사 4", pp.109~ (2003)
- "삼국사기", ~
- 정인보, "高句麗霸業과 永樂大王, In 薝園 鄭寅普全集 4", pp.293~324 (1983), 연세대학교출판부
- 한치윤, "海東繹史 續 권8, 백제조", ~
- 단재신채호선생기념사업회, "개정판 단재신채호전집 상", pp.204~206 (1977), 형설출판사
- 이홍직, "梁 職貢圖 論考-특히 백제국사신도경을 중심으로, In 韓國古代史의 硏究", pp.402~403 (1971)
- 이만열, "丹齋 申采浩의 歷史學 硏究", pp.139~147 (1990), 文學과知性社
- 이기문, "언어자료로서 본 삼국사기", 진단학보, (38), pp.211~215
- 이병도, "韓國古代史硏究", pp.139~151 (1976), 博英社
- 金鍾太, "낙랑시대의 명문고-瓦塼․封泥․印章을 중심으로", 考古美術, 135 (1977), 한국미술사학회
- 복기대, "臨屯太守章 封泥를 통해 본 漢四郡의 위치", 白山學報, 61, pp.62~, 백산학회
- 연세대학교담원문록간행위원회, "薝園文錄", pp.252~253 (1967), 연세대학교출판부
