韓國 初期靑磁 生産窯址의 分布와 性格
Distribution and Character of Production Kiln Sites in Early Goryo Celdon
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is rearranged the announced paper in the symposium of "The Character of Early Goryo Celadon in Haenam Province Whawon and Ocean Exchange" at 2011.09.02. The content and composition of this paper is similar with my continuous view about early Goryo celadon. But I should reorganize systematically the analysis and character of the distribution of production kilns in early Goryo celadon for the aim of the symposium. As we know, the production kilns of early Goryo celadon in Korea have two groups, brick built kilns and mud built kilns. The one had originated in mid-west province and spreaded, the other had originated in west-south province and spreaded. Those two groups aroused disputes about their periodical order. Now we can conclude that brick built type was ahead and then there was mud built type by the analysis depended on results of some excavations. And we can confirm that analysis by the piled situation of kiln sites in remains and some aspects of relics in sedimentary layers and the comparison with historical materials. We can grasp that kilns were operated by national organization leaded by royal household from early stage. Main aim of early Goryo celadon producing were securing on tea vessels and vessels for memorial service, but making living vessels were also another main aim. The transfer of center of ceramic industry was possible by the completion of the collection of tax system between the periods of Seong-Jong(成宗) and Hyeon-Jong(顯宗) in fixing about the ruling system for provinces. In those surroundings, we can conclude that the main causes were insufficiency of human resources by the invasion of Kitan and the timber prohibition law by the building of castle and the Buddhist rituals and services. The matter of chronological order is main point about some problems concerning early Goryo celadon including the matter of periodical order. In the insufficient situation of historical materials, we should understand exactly the various archeological materials and then consider the history of constitution and relations with surrounding nations.
Abstract
This paper is rearranged the announced paper in the symposium of "The Character of Early Goryo Celadon in Haenam Province Whawon and Ocean Exchange" at 2011.09.02. The content and composition of this paper is similar with my continuous view about early Goryo celadon. But I should reorganize systematically the analysis and character of the distribution of production kilns in early Goryo celadon for the aim of the symposium. As we know, the production kilns of early Goryo celadon in Korea have two groups, brick built kilns and mud built kilns. The one had originated in mid-west province and spreaded, the other had originated in west-south province and spreaded. Those two groups aroused disputes about their periodical order. Now we can conclude that brick built type was ahead and then there was mud built type by the analysis depended on results of some excavations. And we can confirm that analysis by the piled situation of kiln sites in remains and some aspects of relics in sedimentary layers and the comparison with historical materials. We can grasp that kilns were operated by national organization leaded by royal household from early stage. Main aim of early Goryo celadon producing were securing on tea vessels and vessels for memorial service, but making living vessels were also another main aim. The transfer of center of ceramic industry was possible by the completion of the collection of tax system between the periods of Seong-Jong(成宗) and Hyeon-Jong(顯宗) in fixing about the ruling system for provinces. In those surroundings, we can conclude that the main causes were insufficiency of human resources by the invasion of Kitan and the timber prohibition law by the building of castle and the Buddhist rituals and services. The matter of chronological order is main point about some problems concerning early Goryo celadon including the matter of periodical order. In the insufficient situation of historical materials, we should understand exactly the various archeological materials and then consider the history of constitution and relations with surrounding nations.
참고문헌 (47)
- 구산우, "高麗 成宗代 정치세력의 성격과 동향", 한국중세사연구, 14, pp.91~148 (2003), 한국중세사학회
- 海南 新德里 靑磁陶窯址 情密地表調査 報告書, "國立光州博物館", ~ (2000)
- 國立光州博物館, "康津 三興里窯址Ⅱ" (2004)
- 仁川 景西洞 綠靑磁窯址, "國立中央博物館", ~ (1990)
- 康津龍雲里靑磁窯址 發掘調査報告書-圖版編-, "國立中央博物館", ~ (1996)
- 康津龍雲里靑磁窯址 發掘調査報告書-本文編-, "國立中央博物館", ~ (1997)
- 高麗靑磁의 發生에 關한 硏究, "吉岡完祐", 崇田大學校博物館, ~ (1979)
- 吉良文男, "朝鮮半島の初期靑磁-高台の形狀を中心に-, In 高麗靑磁の誕生", pp.1~8 (2004), 大阪市立東洋陶磁美術館
- 김구근, "大邱近郊의 初期靑磁窯址에 대하여, In 벽돌가마와 초기청자", pp.37~53 (2000), 海剛陶磁美術館
- 김영진, "도자기가마터 발굴보고, 영인본" (2003), 백산
- 驪州 中岩里 高麗白磁窯址, "京畿道博物館", ~ (2004)
- 金載悅, "龍仁 西里 고려백자요지 발굴조사 내용 및 의의, In 고려시대의 용인", pp.209~236 (1998), 학연문화사
- 南秀雄, "圓山里窯跡の開城周邊の靑磁資料", 東洋陶磁, 22, pp.105~120 (1994), 東洋陶磁學會
- 변남주, "해남 화원청자 가마터 출토편의 종류와 특징", 지방사와 지방문화, 14(2), pp.53~96 (2011), 역사문화학회
- 森本朝子, "博多出土の高麗․朝鮮陶磁-生産地編年を視座として-", 博多硏究誌, 10, pp.41~75 (2000), 博多硏究會
- 高敞雅山댐水沒地區發掘調査報告書-靑磁窯址․冶鐵址․逸名寺址․빈대절터-, "圓光大學校 馬韓百濟文化硏究所", 157~168 (1985)
- 윤경진, "高麗 成宗 14년의 군현제 개편에 대한 연구", 한국문화, 27, pp.109~146 (2001), 서울대학교 규장각 한국학연구원
- 윤용이, "高麗靑瓷의 變遷", 澗松文華, 31, pp.73~95 (1986), 韓國民族美術硏究所
- 尹龍二, "高麗靑瓷窯址의 硏究", 考古美術, 171․172, pp.59~72 (1986), 韓國美術史學會
- 尹龍二, "高麗靑瓷의 起源과 發展, In 韓國美術史의 現況", pp.229~242 (1992), 藝耕
- 尹龍爀, "公州 文錦里 청자요지, In 장보고 대사의 활동과 그 시대에 관한 문헌사적 연구 2", pp.85~118 (2010), 아세아해양사학회
- 이정훈, "고려 현종대 거란과의 전쟁과 지배체제 개편", 한국중세사연구, (29), pp.177~212 (2010), 한국중세사학회
- 이종민, "한국의 초기청자 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 이종민, "韓國初期靑磁의 形成과 傳播 -塼築窯와 土築窯를 중심으로-", 미술사학연구, 240, pp.51~75 (2003), 한국미술사학회
- 이종민, "고려초 청자생산 중심지의 이동과정 연구", 역사와 담론, (58), pp.273~307 (2011), 호서사학회
- 李喜寬, "韓國 初期靑磁에 있어서 해무리굽碗 問題의 再檢討 ―韓國 靑磁製作의 開始時期問題의 解決을 위하여―", 미술사학연구, 237 (2003), 한국미술사학회
- 이희관, "高敞郡 龍溪里窯와 ＂太平壬戌＂銘 瓦片 및 塼築窯 문제", 미술사학연구, (244), pp.95~120 (2004), 한국미술사학회
- 이희관, "한국 초기청자 연구의 현황과 문제점", 지방사와 지방문화, 14(2), pp.7~51 (2011), 역사문화학회
- 張起熏, "窯道具를 통해 본 初期靑磁 窯業의 變遷", 미술사연구, (16), pp.229~254 (2002), 미술사연구회
- 장남원, "高麗時代 京畿地域 窯業의 性格", 고문화, (63), pp.83~108 (2004), 한국대학박물관협회
- 장남원, "漕運과 도자생산 그리고 유통: 海底引揚 고려도자를 중심으로", 미술사연구, (22), pp.169~198 (2008), 미술사연구회
- 康津 三興里窯址 Ⅰ, "(財)湖南文化財硏究院", ~ (2004)
- 조선유적유물도감편찬위원회, "조선유적유물도감12" (1992)
- 浙江省博物館, "浙江紀年瓷" (2000), 文物出版社
- 조은정, "한반도 남서부 지역 토축요 연구: 해남 신덕리를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2003
- 崔健, "韓國初期靑磁の分類と變遷-窯址出土品を中心に-", 東洋陶磁, 22, pp.41~64 (1994), 東洋陶磁學會
- 崔健, "靑磁窯址의 系譜와 展開", 미술사연구, (12), pp.3~20 (1998), 미술사연구회
- 최건, "初期靑磁 編年問題 再論", 미술사학연구, (250), pp.121~147 (2006), 한국미술사학회
- 崔淳雨, "高麗陶磁의 編年, In 韓國의 美-靑磁-", pp.195~211 (1981), 中央日報社․季刊美術
- 本田まび, "임진왜란 전후의 한일 도자 비교연구: 일본 구주 비전도자와의 관계를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2003
- 한정훈, "고려 초기 60浦制의 실시와 그 의미", 지역과 역사, (25), pp.129~162 (2009), 부경역사연구소
- 康津의 靑磁窯址, "海剛陶磁美術館", ~ (1992)
- 海剛陶磁美術館, "벽돌가마와 초기청자" (2000)
- 海剛陶磁美術館, "芳山大窯" (2001)
- 해남군, "海南의 靑磁窯址" (2002)
- 湖巖美術館, "龍仁西里高麗白磁窯" (1987)
- 湖巖美術館, "龍仁西里高麗白磁窯Ⅱ" (2003)