본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고려초 청자생산 중심지의 이동과정 연구

A Study of Movement Process for Central District of Celadon Production in Early Goryo Preiod

이종민
호서사학회 (The Ho-Suh Historical Association)|2011.04|역사와 담론 (HISTORY AND DISCOURSE(Journal of Historycal Review))|제58호|pp. 273-307

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

전축요토축요거란침입나주세력조운체계brick built kilns(塼築窯)mud built kilns(土築窯)Invasion of KitanInfluential group of Na-Ju Provincethe Marine Transportation System(漕運體制)
주제분류역사학

초록

This the purpose of this study is to explain the process and the background of transfer of the ceramic industry. This study presumed the center of the ceramic industry moved from the mid western area to the south western area and tried to demonstrate that theory with the law system history and materials. Previous theories insisted on the Kang-Jin as the place of origin of the celadon or both mid western and south western areas developed ceramic industries under the separated condition. But even though therewere archaeological evidence, those theories misinterpreted the materials and made misunderstanding. This study is convinced that Goryo celadon industry started in Gae-Sung around mid western area for the large amount of consumption in the first half part of the 10th century, and the celadon industry moved into the south western area in the late 10th to to early 11th century while establishing the governing system. This could be approached from two angles, one is the view of political history and the other is law systemic view. In the view of political history, the maternal relatives of the Goryo kingdom in Na-Ju province took over the celadon industry, and as the result the Kang-Jin, Hae-Nam, and Jang-Hueng areas under Na-Ju province were became the center cities of the ceramic industy. In the view of law system history, the tax system had established in this period so taxes could be collected through the sea route. The sea route helped the upper classes to purchase the celadon and delivered the products to the mid western area. As a result of those systems, south western area prospered the ceramic industry. In consequence of this study, while the late 10th century and the early 11th century, the celadon industry moved to south western area from the mid western area Gae-Sung, and the Na-Ju Oh’s family managed the celadon industry through the So-system under the newly modified political and tax system.

Abstract

This the purpose of this study is to explain the process and the background of transfer of the ceramic industry. This study presumed the center of the ceramic industry moved from the mid western area to the south western area and tried to demonstrate that theory with the law system history and materials. Previous theories insisted on the Kang-Jin as the place of origin of the celadon or both mid western and south western areas developed ceramic industries under the separated condition. But even though therewere archaeological evidence, those theories misinterpreted the materials and made misunderstanding. This study is convinced that Goryo celadon industry started in Gae-Sung around mid western area for the large amount of consumption in the first half part of the 10th century, and the celadon industry moved into the south western area in the late 10th to to early 11th century while establishing the governing system. This could be approached from two angles, one is the view of political history and the other is law systemic view. In the view of political history, the maternal relatives of the Goryo kingdom in Na-Ju province took over the celadon industry, and as the result the Kang-Jin, Hae-Nam, and Jang-Hueng areas under Na-Ju province were became the center cities of the ceramic industy. In the view of law system history, the tax system had established in this period so taxes could be collected through the sea route. The sea route helped the upper classes to purchase the celadon and delivered the products to the mid western area. As a result of those systems, south western area prospered the ceramic industry. In consequence of this study, while the late 10th century and the early 11th century, the celadon industry moved to south western area from the mid western area Gae-Sung, and the Na-Ju Oh’s family managed the celadon industry through the So-system under the newly modified political and tax system.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. (財)湖南文化財硏究院, "康津 三興里窯址Ⅰ" (2004)
  2. 京畿道博物館, "驪州 中岩里 高麗白磁窯址" (2004)
  3. "高麗史", ~
  4. "高麗史節要", ~
  5. 高興郡, "高興 雲垈里 陶瓷文化의 性格" (2005)
  6. 구산우, "高麗 成宗代 정치세력의 성격과 동향", 한국중세사연구, 14, pp.91~148 (2003), 한국중세사학회
  7. 구산우, "고려 현종대의 대거란전쟁과 그 정치 · 외교적 성격", 역사와경계, (74), pp.85~127 (2010), 부산경남사학회
  8. 國立光州博物館, "康津 三興里窯址Ⅱ" (2004)
  9. 國立光州博物館, "全南地方 陶窯址 調査報告(Ⅳ)", pp.136~ (1995)
  10. 康津龍雲里靑磁窯址發掘調査報告書, "國立中央博物館", ~ (1997)
  11. 金載悅, "高麗白磁의 發生과 編年", 考古美術, 177 (1988), 韓國美術史學會
  12. 吉岡完佑, "高麗靑磁의 發生에 關한 硏究" (1979), 崇田大學校博物館
  13. 吉良文男, "朝鮮半島の初期的靑磁, in 高麗靑磁- 高麗靑磁の誕生-", pp.1~8 (2004), 大阪市立東洋陶磁美術館
  14. 南秀雄, "圓山里窯跡の開城周邊の靑磁資料", 東洋陶磁, 22, pp.105~120 (1992), 東洋陶磁學會
  15. 木浦大學校博物館, "海南 珍山里 綠 靑磁窯址" (1992)
  16. 文秀鎭, "高麗建國 期의 羅州勢力", 成大士林, (4), pp.22~23 (1987), 成大史學會
  17. 尾岐洵盛, "高麗陶磁の起源に關する問題の考察", 陶說, 82 (1960)
  18. 朴漢卨, "羅州道大行臺考", 江原史學, 1 (1985)
  19. 방병선, "한반도의 흙, 도자기로 태어나다", pp.236~240, 국사편찬위원회
  20. 三上次男, "高麗陶磁の起源とその歷史的背景", 朝鮮學報, (99) (1982)
  21. 高敞雅山댐水沒地區發掘調査報告書-靑磁窯址․冶鐵址․逸名寺址․빈대절터-, "圓光大學校 馬韓百濟文化硏究所", ~ (1985)
  22. 윤경진, "高麗 成宗 14년의 군현제 개편에 대한 연구", 한국문화, 27, pp.109~146 (2001), 서울대학교 규장각 한국학연구원
  23. 尹龍二, "高麗陶磁의 變遷", 澗松文華, (31) (1986)
  24. 이정신, "강동 6주와 윤관의 9성을 통해 본 고려의 대외정책, in 고려시대의 정치변동과 대외정책", pp.61~ (2004), 경인문화사
  25. 이정훈, "고려 현종대 거란과의 전쟁과 지배체제 개편", 한국중세사연구, (29), pp.177~212 (2010), 한국중세사학회
  26. 李鍾玟, "고려 청자에 보이는 越窯 청자의 영향, in 中國陶磁", pp.380~389, 국립중앙박물관
  27. 李鍾玟, "南部地域 初期靑磁의 系統과 特徵", 미술사연구, (16), pp.199~228 (2002), 미술사연구회
  28. 李鍾玟, "始興 芳山洞 初期靑磁窯址 出土品을 통해 본 中部地域 塼築窯의 運營時期 考察", 美術史學硏究, 228 (2000), 韓國美術史學會
  29. 이종민, "韓國初期靑磁의 形成과 傳播 -塼築窯와 土築窯를 중심으로-", 미술사학연구, 240 (2003), 한국미술사학회
  30. 李鍾玟, "韓國의 初期靑磁 硏究", 박사, pp.2002
  31. 李鍾玟, "韓半島中部地方の初期靑磁窯, in 高麗靑磁-高麗靑磁の誕生-", pp.9~18 (2004), 大阪市立東洋陶磁美術館
  32. 李準光, "高麗靑磁의 海上運送과 出土遺物 硏究", 석사, pp.2010
  33. 이희관, "高敞郡 龍溪里窯와 ＂太平壬戌＂銘 瓦片 및 塼築窯 문제", 미술사학연구, (244), pp.95~120 (2004), 한국미술사학회
  34. 李喜寬, "韓國 初期靑磁에 있어서 해무리굽碗 問題의 再檢討 ―韓國 靑磁製作의 開始時期問題의 解決을 위하여―", 미술사학연구, 237 (2003), 한국미술사학회
  35. 李喜寬, "高麗初期 靑磁生産體制의 變動과 그 背景", 美術史學硏究, 232, pp.21~55 (2001)
  36. 임용한, "전쟁과 역사 2" (2004), 혜안
  37. 長谷部樂爾, "陶器講座8 高麗Ⅰ" (1971), 雄山閣
  38. 장남원, "漕運과 도자생산 그리고 유통: 海底引揚 고려도자를 중심으로", 미술사연구, (22), pp.169~198 (2008), 미술사연구회
  39. 鄭良謨, "高麗靑磁, in 高麗靑磁名品特別展", pp.268~283 (1989), 國立中央博物館
  40. 鄭淸柱, "新羅末․高麗初의 羅州豪族", 全北史學, 14, pp.1~33 (1991), 全北大學校史學會
  41. 조선유적유물도감편찬위원회, "조선유적유물도감 12" (1992)
  42. 崔健, "靑磁窯址의 系譜와 展開", 미술사연구, 12, pp.3~20 (1998), 미술사연구회
  43. 최건, "初期靑磁 編年問題 再論", 미술사학연구, (250), pp.121~147 (2006), 한국미술사학회
  44. 崔圭成, "북방민족과의 관계, in 한국사5", pp.202~ (1995), 국사편찬위원회
  45. 崔淳雨, "高麗陶磁의 編年, in 世界陶磁全集 18高麗" (1978), 小學館
  46. 한성욱, "康津 靑瓷의 生産과 流通", 문화사학, (34), pp.87~109 (2010), 한국문화사학회
  47. 한정훈, "고려 초기 60浦制의 실시와 그 의미", 지역과 역사, (25), pp.129~162 (2009), 부경역사연구소
  48. 海剛陶磁美術館, "芳山大窯", pp.161~169 (2001)
  49. 海剛陶磁美術館, "康津의 靑磁窯址", pp.158~160 (1992)
  50. 龍仁西里高麗白磁窯 發掘調査報告書 Ⅱ, "湖巖美術館", 84~185 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

韓國 初期靑磁 生産窯址의 分布와 性格이종민호서사학회 · 역사와 담론2012 · 제63호한국에서 자기 생산 기술의 도입과 확산에 대한 일고찰전용호수선사학회 · 사림2020 · 제73호강진지역 청자의 현황 및 발전 방안 연구강성곤한국도자학회 · 한국도자학연구2007 · 제3권 제2호高麗靑瓷 出現의 수수께끼이희관동국역사문화연구소 · 동국사학2013 · 제55호나말여초 청자 제작과 전통기술방병선한국고대학회 · 선사와 고대2009 · 제30호麗末~鮮初 硬質白磁로의 이행과정 연구이종민호서사학회 · 역사와 담론2008 · 제50호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

高麗 건국기 西南海 지방세력의 동향 - ― 羅州 호족의 활동을 중심으로신호철pp. 1-32高麗前期 保勝·精勇軍의 性格과 地方軍 構成에 대한 再檢討최종석pp. 33-71조선시대 ‘海美邑城’의 축성과 기능변천 - 충청병영성에서 호서좌영으로 -임선빈pp. 73-102조선시대 충청도 「사마방목」 입록실태와 추이이연숙pp. 105-153조선시기 한국인과 한국범의 관계 변화이항, 김동진pp. 155-185
원문 보기