본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국에서 자기 생산 기술의 도입과 확산에 대한 일고찰

A Study on the Introduction and the Diffusion of Porcelain Production Technology in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Porcelain production technology was introduced to Korea from China as the powerful local clans got stronger between the Unified Silla and early Goryeo period. Zen sects, the nine-mountain schools of the Zen sect and tea culture became popular during the political chaos. Later, the Three Kingdoms were established and accordingly the demand for porcelain increased. It seemed that China could not properly block its porcelain production technology from flowing into Korea because China was also awash in the chaos of Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. Diverse powerful local clans on the Korean peninsula tried to strengthen their political influence by introducing porcelain production technology rather importing porcelains and thus accumulate economic wealth. It is difficult to accurately define when the porcelain production was started in Korea because of insufficient data. However, it seems reasonable that the porcelain production would have started between late 9th century and early 10th century in accordance with the extensive deliberation on the background of the introduction of porcelain production technology in Korea and its expansion pattern. The porcelain production technology was individually introduced from China to Korea through the routes independently explored by the political powers from the midwest and southwest regions of the Korean peninsula. The hubs of such introduction were Bangsan-dong, Siheung in the midwest region, and Dotong-ri, Jinan and Punggil-ri, Jangheung in the southwest region in accordance with the examination of teacups with a Korean-style halo-shaped foot and other teacups with halo-shaped feet (existing teacups with proto-pi-shaped feett and teacups with intermediate halo-shaped feet) found earlier. The porcelain production system varied due to the difference in the exchange patterns with China. In the midwest region or Dotong-ri, Jinan, Chinese technicians came to Korea, built brick kilns and produced porcelain using those kilns. However, in the southwest region, including Jangheung or Gangjin, Korean potters went to China and learned the technology through the networks built by the marine activities of Jang Bogo and produced porcelain using the existing clay kilns. However, in the late 10th century, when Goryeo unified during the late Three Kingdoms period and strengthened their control on local areas through the centralization of power, the existing hubs of porcelain production were moved to neighboring areas due to the extensive reorganization of sites. The hubs of porcelain production were expanded from Bangsan-dong, Siheung to Seo-ri, Yongin, and Jungam-ri, Yeoju, from Dotong-ri, Jinan to Yonggye-ri, Gochang, and from Punggil-ri, Jangheung to Yongwun-ri, Gangjin and Wundae-ri, Goheung. When the hubs were expanded to neighboring areas, the kilns were characterized by various kinds of operations and long operating periods. The period after mid-Goryeo could be considered as the stage when the hub of celadon production was completely settled to Yucheon-ri, Buan and Sadang-ri, Gangjin.

Abstract

Porcelain production technology was introduced to Korea from China as the powerful local clans got stronger between the Unified Silla and early Goryeo period. Zen sects, the nine-mountain schools of the Zen sect and tea culture became popular during the political chaos. Later, the Three Kingdoms were established and accordingly the demand for porcelain increased. It seemed that China could not properly block its porcelain production technology from flowing into Korea because China was also awash in the chaos of Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. Diverse powerful local clans on the Korean peninsula tried to strengthen their political influence by introducing porcelain production technology rather importing porcelains and thus accumulate economic wealth. It is difficult to accurately define when the porcelain production was started in Korea because of insufficient data. However, it seems reasonable that the porcelain production would have started between late 9th century and early 10th century in accordance with the extensive deliberation on the background of the introduction of porcelain production technology in Korea and its expansion pattern. The porcelain production technology was individually introduced from China to Korea through the routes independently explored by the political powers from the midwest and southwest regions of the Korean peninsula. The hubs of such introduction were Bangsan-dong, Siheung in the midwest region, and Dotong-ri, Jinan and Punggil-ri, Jangheung in the southwest region in accordance with the examination of teacups with a Korean-style halo-shaped foot and other teacups with halo-shaped feet (existing teacups with proto-pi-shaped feett and teacups with intermediate halo-shaped feet) found earlier. The porcelain production system varied due to the difference in the exchange patterns with China. In the midwest region or Dotong-ri, Jinan, Chinese technicians came to Korea, built brick kilns and produced porcelain using those kilns. However, in the southwest region, including Jangheung or Gangjin, Korean potters went to China and learned the technology through the networks built by the marine activities of Jang Bogo and produced porcelain using the existing clay kilns. However, in the late 10th century, when Goryeo unified during the late Three Kingdoms period and strengthened their control on local areas through the centralization of power, the existing hubs of porcelain production were moved to neighboring areas due to the extensive reorganization of sites. The hubs of porcelain production were expanded from Bangsan-dong, Siheung to Seo-ri, Yongin, and Jungam-ri, Yeoju, from Dotong-ri, Jinan to Yonggye-ri, Gochang, and from Punggil-ri, Jangheung to Yongwun-ri, Gangjin and Wundae-ri, Goheung. When the hubs were expanded to neighboring areas, the kilns were characterized by various kinds of operations and long operating periods. The period after mid-Goryeo could be considered as the stage when the hub of celadon production was completely settled to Yucheon-ri, Buan and Sadang-ri, Gangjin.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. 長興 豊吉里 靑瓷窯址, "국립나주문화재연구소", ~ (2016)
  2. 진안 도통리 초기청자요지Ⅰ, "군산대학교박물관", ~ (2016)
  3. 진안 도통리 중평 청자요지 4차 발굴조사 약보고서, "군산대학교박물관", ~ (2017)
  4. 고창 용계리 청자요지, "대한문화재연구원", ~ (2015)
  5. 강진 용운리 63 고려청자요지, "민족문화유산연구원", ~ (2015)
  6. 고흥 운대리 분청사기 요지 주변정비 시굴조사 약보고서, "민족문화유산연구원", ~ (2013)
  7. 고창 아산댐 수몰지구 발굴조사 보고서, "원광대학교 마한 백제문화연구소", ~ (1985)
  8. 조선유적유물도감편찬위원회, "조선유적유물도감", 12~ (1992)
  9. 호암미술관, "용인서리고려백자요", ~ (1987)
  10. 용인서리고려백자요 발굴조사보고서 Ⅱ, "호암미술관", ~ (2003)
  11. 강봉룡, "장보고" (2004), 한얼미디어
  12. 尹龍二, "韓國陶瓷美術史硏究" (1993), 文藝出版社
  13. 鄭良謨, "韓國의 陶磁器" (1991), 文藝出版社
  14. 곽장근, "진안 도통리 초기청자 요지와 후백제, 진안도통리 청자", 2014년 테마전 도록, ~ (2014)
  15. 곽장근, "진안고원 초기청자의 등장배경 연구", 전북사학, (42), pp.107~136 (2013), 전북사학회
  16. 권혁주, "한국 초기청자 ‘해무리굽 완’의 변천", 진안 도통리 청자가마터 조사성과와 과제, 학술심포지엄 자료집 (2016)
  17. 金英美, "越窯硏究", 博士, pp.2002
  18. 김영진, "황해남도 봉천군 원산리 청자가마터 발굴 간략보고", 조선고고연구, (2) (1991), 사회과학출판사
  19. 김영진, "도자기가마터발굴보고" (2002), 사회과학출판사
  20. 金寅圭, "朝鮮半島におけゐ初期靑磁の新しい成果について-京畿道始興市芳山洞窯址を中心にー", 出光美術館 館報, 120 (2002), 出光美術館
  21. 김재열, "한국자기발생의 제문제" (1990)
  22. 金載悅, "高麗白磁의 發生과 編年", 考古美術, 177 (1998), 韓國美術史學會
  23. 金載悅, "고려시대의 용인" (1996)
  24. 朴淳發, "용인 서리 고려백자요지의 재조명" (2001)
  25. 방병선, "羅末麗初 韓中陶瓷交流", 韓國史學報, (23), pp.341~380 (2006), 고려사학회
  26. 尹龍二, "高麗陶瓷의 變遷", 澗松文化, 31 (1986), 韓國民族美術硏究所
  27. 尹龍二, "韓國 靑瓷의 成立", 美術史論壇, 15 (2002), 韓國美術硏究所
  28. 李鍾玟, "始興 芳山洞 初期靑磁 窯址 出土品을 통해서 본 中部地方 塼築窯의 運營時期", 美術史學硏究, 228, 229 (2001), 韓國美術史學會
  29. 李鍾玟, "韓國의 初期靑磁 硏究", 博士, pp.2002
  30. 이종민, "韓國初期靑磁의 形成과 傳播 -塼築窯와 土築窯를 중심으로-", 미술사학연구, 240 (2003), 한국미술사학회
  31. 이종민, "고려초 청자생산 중심지의 이동과정 연구", 역사와 담론, (58), pp.273~307 (2011), 호서사학회
  32. 李鍾玟, "한국 해무리굽 청자의 발생과 확산-진안 도통리 요지에 대한 이해를 위해, 진안 도통리 청자", 2014년 테마전 도록, ~ (2014)
  33. 李鍾玟, "長興 豊吉里 靑瓷窯址" (2016)
  34. 이종민, "나말여초 청자요업의 개시 여건과 고고학적 산물의 검토", 한국중세고고학, (1) (2017), 한국중 세고고학회
  35. 李鍾宣金載悅朴淳發, "삼불김원용교수정년퇴임논총II" (1987), 일지사
  36. 李喜寬, "대외 문물교류 연구" (2002)
  37. 이희관, "韓國 初期靑磁에 있어서 해무리굽碗 問題의 再檢討 ―韓國 靑磁製作의 開始時期問題의 解決을 위하여―", 미술사학연구, 237 (2003), 한국미술사학회
  38. 이희관, "高麗 初期靑瓷와 越窯의 關係에 대한 몇 가지 問題", 사학연구, (96), pp.1~37 (2009), 한국사학회
  39. 李喜寬, "高麗陶瓷新論" (2009), 학연문화사
  40. 이희관, "한국 초기청자 연구의 현황과 문제점", 지방사와 지방문화, 14(2), pp.7~51 (2011), 역사문화학회[DOI]
  41. 이희관, "唐宋時期 越窯 가마의 구조와 그 특징 - 고려시기 청자 가마 구조의 파악을 위한 전제", 미술자료, (92), pp.112~140 (2017), 국립중앙박물관
  42. 李喜寬, "高麗初期 靑瓷生産體制의 變動과 그 背景", 美術史學硏究, 232 (2001), 韓國美術史學會
  43. 張起熏, "窯道具를 통해 본 初期靑磁 窯業의 變遷", 미술사연구, (16), pp.229~254 (2002), 미술사연구회
  44. 장남원, "高麗時代 京畿地域 窯業의 性格", 고문화, (63), pp.83~108 (2004), 한국대학박물관협회[DOI]
  45. 碗의 지속현상에 대한 추론 ―동아시아 북방도자와의 관련성을 중심으로―, "역사와 담론", 2008, 321~353, pp.호서사학회
  46. 장남원, "10~12세기 고려와 遼ㆍ金도자의 교류", 미술사학, 23, pp.171~203 (2009), 한국미술사교육학회
  47. 정상기, "진안 도통리 중평 청자가마터-조사성과와 과제-" (2016)
  48. 조은정, "한반도 남서부 지역 토축요 연구: 해남 신덕리를 중심으로", 석사, 한국미술사, pp.2003
  49. 鄭良謨, "高麗靑磁名品特別展" (1989), 通川文化社
  50. 崔健, "韓國初期靑磁の分類と變遷-窯址出土品を中心にー", 東洋陶磁, 22 (1994), 東洋陶磁學會
  51. 崔健, "韓國 靑磁 硏究의 새로운 動向", 미술사연구, (16), pp.177~198 (2002), 미술사연구회
  52. 최건, "한국 청자 발생에 관한 배경적 고찰", 고문화, (31), pp.17~35 (1987), 한국대학박물관협회
  53. 최건, "初期靑磁 編年問題 再論", 미술사학연구, (250), pp.121~147 (2006), 한국미술사학회
  54. 吉良文男, "용인 서리 고려백자요지의 재조명" (2001)
  55. 小田富士夫, "高麗の古陶磁", 陶器講座, 22 (1937), 雄山閣
  56. 野守健, "高麗陶磁の硏究" (1944), 淸閑舍
  57. 長谷部樂爾, "陶磁講座 8 朝鮮" (1973), 雄山閣出版株式會社
  58. 長谷部樂爾, "陶磁大系 29 高麗靑磁" (1977), 平凡社
  59. 吉岡完祐, "高麗靑磁의 發生에 關한 硏究" (1979), 崇田大學校博物館
  60. 伊藤郁太郞, "高麗靑磁をめぐゐ諸問題-編年論を中心にー", 東洋陶磁, 22 (1994), 東洋陶磁學會
  61. 三上次男, "高麗靑磁の起源とその歷史的背景", 朝鮮學報, 99,100 (1981), 朝鮮學會
  62. 林士民, "靑瓷與越窯" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
  63. 浙江省文物考古硏究所, "寺龍口越窯址" (2002), 文物出版社
  64. 국립전주박물관, "진안 도통리 청자", 2014년 테마전 도록, ~ (2014)
  65. 崔健, "康津의 靑磁窯址", 海剛陶磁美術館全羅南道康津郡, ~ (1992)
  66. 해강도자미술관, "방산대요", ~ (2001)
  67. 해강도자미술관, "벽돌가마와 초기청자" (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)