한국 고전문헌의 표점방식에 대한 시론 - 중국식 표점과 한국식 현토의 차이를 중심으로 -
On the punctuation rule of Korean classical literatures - Mostly referring to differences between Chinese punctuation and Korean Hyeonto -
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
At present, there is no unified punctuation rule of Korean classical literatures. Also, some people prefer to use 'Korean punctuation rule' to 'Chinese punctuation rule'. Then, is the difference between Chinese classical writings and Korean ones such great that a different punctuation rule to be applied to each of them? Why is it difficult to apply the same punctuation rule to them? The demand for the 'Korean punctuation rule' seems to be caused by two reasons. First, there is a difference between Korean Hyeonto rule and Chinese punctuation rule, and second, punctuation marks not used in Korea are used. Accordingly, this paper aims to describe the usage and utility of Chinese punctuation marks and next to discuss about the difference between Chinese punctuation rule and Korean Hyeonto rule. The present day when people all over the world are closely connected, the proper arrangement of Korean classics is not only for domestic researchers. Korean classics have to be uniformly arranged so that any man who can decipher Classical Chinese, the common written language of ancient East Asia, may be able to access them. Accordingly, before discussing about 'Korean punctuation rule', it would be necessary to exactly understand 'Chinese punctuation rule'.
Abstract
At present, there is no unified punctuation rule of Korean classical literatures. Also, some people prefer to use 'Korean punctuation rule' to 'Chinese punctuation rule'. Then, is the difference between Chinese classical writings and Korean ones such great that a different punctuation rule to be applied to each of them? Why is it difficult to apply the same punctuation rule to them? The demand for the 'Korean punctuation rule' seems to be caused by two reasons. First, there is a difference between Korean Hyeonto rule and Chinese punctuation rule, and second, punctuation marks not used in Korea are used. Accordingly, this paper aims to describe the usage and utility of Chinese punctuation marks and next to discuss about the difference between Chinese punctuation rule and Korean Hyeonto rule. The present day when people all over the world are closely connected, the proper arrangement of Korean classics is not only for domestic researchers. Korean classics have to be uniformly arranged so that any man who can decipher Classical Chinese, the common written language of ancient East Asia, may be able to access them. Accordingly, before discussing about 'Korean punctuation rule', it would be necessary to exactly understand 'Chinese punctuation rule'.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김학주, "맹자" (2002), 명문당
- 박헌순, "논어역주 1·2" (2008), 한길사
- 서울대 동양사학연구실, "고급한문해석법" (1994), 창작과비평
- 성백효, "『懸吐完譯 論語集註』·『懸吐完譯 孟子集註』·『懸吐完譯 大學·中庸集註』", 전통문화연구회
- 열린책들 편집부, "열린책들 편집 매뉴얼" (2009), 열린책들
- 이동철, "韓國 古典籍 整理에서 校勘과 標點의 現況과 課題 －1980년대 이후 개인 연구자들의 주요한 성과를 중심으로", 민족문화, 31(31), pp.71~122 (2008), 한국고전번역원
- 이상하, "한문학습 및 번역에 있어서 현토의 문제", 민족문화, (29), pp.45~74 (2006), 한국고전번역원
- 충북대학교 우암연구소, "우암 자료 집성 및 정본화 사업 標點·校勘 범례안", ~ (2008)
- 中國國家語言文字工作委員會, "標點符號用法", ~ (1990)
- 中華書局, "古籍校點釋例(初稿)｣" (1991)
- 古敬恒, "古文標點技法" (1994), 中國鑛業大學出版社
- 管敏義, "怎樣標點古書" (1985), 書目文獻出版社
- 管錫華, "古代中國標點符號發展史" (2002), 巴蜀書社
- 金良年, "『論語譯注』 및 『孟子譯注』" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
- 鳳凰出版傳媒集團, "四書集注" (2005), 鳳凰出版社
- 謝冰瑩, "新譯四書讀本" (2006), 三民書局
- 楊伯峻, "論語譯注" (1980), 中華書局
- 楊伯峻, "孟子譯注" (1960), 中華書局
- 呂叔湘, "標點古書評議" (1988), 商務印書館
- 王邁, "古文標點例析" (1992), 語文出版社
- 林穗芳, "標點符號學習與 應用" (2001), 人民出版社
- 章秋農, "古書記言標點易誤擧例", 中國語文, 3 (1979)
- 陳戍國, "四書校注" (2004), 岳鹿書社
- 新編諸子集成, "四書章句集注" (1983), 中華書局
- "朱子全書 제6책" (1996), 上海古籍出版社·安徽敎育出版社