忠臣戀主之詞의 理解와 史的 展開
The Understanding of a Loyalist's Love-Song for his King and its Historical Development
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
고전시가 중에는 충신연주지사라 불리는 작품들이 있다. 하지만 지금까지 충신연주지사의 개념에 대한 본격적인 논의는 거의 없었다. 그래서 본고는 『조선왕조실록』에 충신연주지사라 언급된 <정과정곡>을 중심으로 충신연주지사에 대해 살펴보았다. 살펴본 결과 충신연주지사라 불리려면 세 가지 조건을 충족해야만 함을 알 수 있었다. 첫째 충신연주지사의 작가는 충신으로 불릴 수 있어야 한다. 둘째 다른 인물이나 세력으로 인해 자신의 의지와 상관없이 왕으로부터 멀어진 상황 속에서 작품이 지어져야 한다. 셋째 왕에 대한 걱정과 그리움이 전제된 내용이어야 한다. 아울러 둘째 조건으로 인해 충신연주지사를 유배 중에 지어진 작품으로만 볼 필요가 없음을 확인할 수 있었으며, 셋째 조건으로 인해 충신연주지사에서 왕을 원망하는 내용은 문학적 관습으로 볼 수 있다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 충신연주지사를 이렇게 이해할 때, 신라 때 지어진 <물계자가>, <실혜가>, <원가>와 조선시대 윤선도의 <견회요>도 충신연주지사로 볼 수 있음을 보았다. 본고를 통해 충신연주지사의 개념과 충신연주지사로서 고전시가가 어떤 성격을 갖는 작품인지 좀 더 구체화되었으리라 본다. 또한 이 논의를 통해 충신연주지사라는 표현을 몇몇 작품, 특정 장르에만 사용할 필요가 없음도 드러났다고 본다.
Abstract
In classical poetry, there are some works called as a loyalist's love-song for his king[忠臣戀主之詞]. However, there has been little discussion of the concept of a loyalist's love-song for his king until now. A loyalist's love-song for his king literally has referred to some work with loyalist's longing for his king. Or, because a work called as a loyalist's love-song for his king was written in one's exile, it has referred to some work that one wrote as he missed his king in his exile. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to consider the concept of a loyalist's love-song for his king, focused on Jeonggwajeonggok[鄭瓜亭曲] which has been stated as a loyalist's love-song for his king in the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty. The result indicates that a work called as a loyalist's love-song for his king must satisfy the following conditions. First, its writer should be appreciated as a loyalist. Second, the song should be written in the situation that the writer grows away from his king regardless of his will due to some influence blocking between his king and him, namely the king's subject. Third, in that situation, the writer should express his own feelings honestly with his longing for his king. A work called as a loyalist's love-song for his king should measure up to these conditions. And the second and the third conditions increase the possibility that a work is regarded as a loyalist's love-song for his king. Due to the second condition, it is not necessary that a loyalist's love-song for his king is defined as some work written in one's exile. It is enough that the song was written in some situation that the writer grew away from his king regardless of his will. The third condition allows a loyalist's love-song for his king to involve some expression of resentment over his king. The resentment reveals itself when the writer expresses his feelings in the situation that he is far away from his king. The expression of resentment over a king is comprehensible as a literary convention of those days. In this way, it is possible that Mulgyejaga[勿稽子歌], Silhyega[實兮歌] and Wonga[怨歌] written in the period of Silla are regarded as loyalists' love-songs for their kings. Unfortunately, the lyrics of Mulgyejaga and Silhyega have been lost to history. However, the situation that they were written in considered, they deserve to be called as a loyalist's love-song for his king. Wonga should be called as a loyalist's love-song for his king because it measures up to the three conditions. This paper examined what a loyalist's love-song for his king is, through the documents regarding Jeonggwajeonggok. In this process, it seems that the meaning of a loyalist's love-song for his king has taken concrete shape a little more. And, in this discussion, it seems that it ie revealed that the expression of a loyalist's love-song for his king is not just for a few works or a specific genre.
참고문헌 (24)
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "松江別集", ~
- 金燉, "宣祖代 沈義謙․金孝元의 갈등 요인 檢討", 歷史敎育, 79, pp.51~ (2001), 역사교육연구회
- 金壽泰, "新羅 聖德王․孝成王代 金順元의 政治的 活動", 東亞硏究, 3, pp.220~223 (1983), 西江大學校 東亞硏究所
- 김쾌덕, "고려노래 속가의 사회배경적연구", pp.205~ (2001), 국학자료원
- 金學成, "高麗歌謠의 作者層과 受容者層", 韓國學報, 31, pp.211~213 (1983), 一志社
- 류연석, "<萬憤歌>에 드러난 怨恨의 양상", 한국시가문화연구, (30), pp.177~206 (2012), 한국시가문화학회
- 范善均, "韓國古典詩歌에 끼친 屈原의 影響", 中語中文學, 10, pp.220~ (1988), 韓國中語中文學會
- 박인희, "〈신충괘관〉과〈원가〉연구", 신라문화, 28(28), pp.299~321 (2006), 신라문화연구소
- 선정규, "굴원평전 장강을 떠도는 영혼", pp.107~ (2000), 신서원
- 兪睿根, "松江의 戀君憂國 文學", 논문집, 12(1), pp.12~13 (1985), 충남대학교 인문과학연구소
- 尹榮玉, "怨歌", 新羅詩歌의 硏究, pp.206~ (1993)
- 李家源, "<萬憤歌> 硏究", 東方學志, pp.161~ (1963), 연세대 국학연구원
- 이상원, "죽하(竹下) 김익(金熼)의 단가 6수와 그의 시가 향유", 泮橋語文硏究, 17, pp.34~40 (2004), 泮橋語文學會
- 이형대, "<怨歌>와 <鄭瓜亭曲>의 시적 인식과 정서", 漢城語文學, 18, pp.116~ (1999), 한성대학교 한성어문학회
- 張德順, "國文學通論", pp.64~ (1960), 新丘文化社
- 鄭景柱, "鄭敍의 生涯와 忠臣戀主之詞로서의 <鄭瓜亭>", 釜山漢文學硏究, 8, pp.247~256 (1994), 釜山漢文學會
- 鄭萬祚, "朝鮮中期 儒學의 系譜와 朋黨政治의 展開 (Ⅰ)", 朝鮮時代史學報, 17, pp.110~ (2001), 朝鮮時代史學會
- 鄭雲采, "왕소군 고사 수용 한시에 나타난 충신연주지사의 심리적 특성", 古詩歌硏究, 5, pp.539~572 (1998), 韓國古詩歌文學會
- 최현재, "忠臣戀主之詞의 전통과 <萬憤歌>에 대한 새로운 이해", 한국언어문학, (70), pp.271~296 (2009), 한국언어문학회
- 末松保和, "新羅の政治と社會 下", pp.182~184 (1995), 吉川弘文館