본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

충신연주지사에서의 주체와 타자

The Subject and the Others in Loyalists' Love-songs for the King(忠臣戀主之詞)

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This paper aims to interpret Loyalists' Love-songs for the King(忠臣戀主之詞) from the viewpoint of ‘the subject and the others’. These Love-songs have been written in traditions with the female speaker of the male servant, specially in this paper all of them exiled. The writers and their works interpreted in this paper are Cho wi's(梅溪 曺偉, 1454~1503) Manboonga<萬憤歌>, Jeong Ceol's(松江 鄭澈, 1536~1593) Samiingok(思美人曲), and Sok-miingok(續美人曲). Also, Chinese works Quyuan(屈原)'s Lisao<離騷> and others are interpreted as the originators of these works. In real life, all the writers were <a male; a governing classes; a Junzi(君子)>, on the other hand in their Loyalists' Love-songs, they disguised as <a female; a governed classes : a xiaoren(小人)> by the persona. The points of this paper are as below : The first point is to show the tradition of the Loyalists' Love-songs in Chosun. The speaker of Quyuan(屈原)'s Lisao<離騷> is male, which had been changed into female by Cho wi. This alternation had been made according to the changes of the classical scholar's role as a servant. The latter had been succeeded by Jeong Ceol, who perfected the Loyalists' Love-songs with a splendid performance. The second point is to pursue the question how deep and fully this unfamiliar, downfallen and literary situation could make the writers understand the others and could make them change their subject in their real life. In Sok-miingok(續美人曲), Jeong Ceol raised the problem of alienation that he must have experienced during his exile period. Although it was not enough for him hiding behind female persona to have the most precious right to give up his subject with his own will, his question in argument must be meaningful. However, he must have shown limits. He was born to be 'a Junzi(君子)' and he was in belief that he could go back to his pre-glorious days sooner or later. That's why he couldn't abandon his subject in order to give a warm reception to the others unconditionally.

Abstract

This paper aims to interpret Loyalists' Love-songs for the King(忠臣戀主之詞) from the viewpoint of ‘the subject and the others’. These Love-songs have been written in traditions with the female speaker of the male servant, specially in this paper all of them exiled. The writers and their works interpreted in this paper are Cho wi's(梅溪 曺偉, 1454~1503) Manboonga<萬憤歌>, Jeong Ceol's(松江 鄭澈, 1536~1593) Samiingok(思美人曲), and Sok-miingok(續美人曲). Also, Chinese works Quyuan(屈原)'s Lisao<離騷> and others are interpreted as the originators of these works. In real life, all the writers were <a male; a governing classes; a Junzi(君子)>, on the other hand in their Loyalists' Love-songs, they disguised as <a female; a governed classes : a xiaoren(小人)> by the persona. The points of this paper are as below : The first point is to show the tradition of the Loyalists' Love-songs in Chosun. The speaker of Quyuan(屈原)'s Lisao<離騷> is male, which had been changed into female by Cho wi. This alternation had been made according to the changes of the classical scholar's role as a servant. The latter had been succeeded by Jeong Ceol, who perfected the Loyalists' Love-songs with a splendid performance. The second point is to pursue the question how deep and fully this unfamiliar, downfallen and literary situation could make the writers understand the others and could make them change their subject in their real life. In Sok-miingok(續美人曲), Jeong Ceol raised the problem of alienation that he must have experienced during his exile period. Although it was not enough for him hiding behind female persona to have the most precious right to give up his subject with his own will, his question in argument must be meaningful. However, he must have shown limits. He was born to be 'a Junzi(君子)' and he was in belief that he could go back to his pre-glorious days sooner or later. That's why he couldn't abandon his subject in order to give a warm reception to the others unconditionally.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 이소경, "굴원, 고문진보 後集" (1999), 명문당
  2. 권두환, "고전시가" (1997), 해냄
  3. 김사엽, "송강가사" (1959), 문호사
  4. 류성준, "楚辭" (2002), 문이재
  5. 성균관대학교 대동문화연구소, "經書" (1998)
  6. 안정복, "잡동산이" (1981), 아세아문화사 영인본
  7. 임기중, "한국역대가사전집 권7, 권9" (1999), 아세아문화사
  8. 정철, "송강가사, 국역 송강집" (1992), 태학사
  9. 국어국문학회, "가사문학연구" (1979), 정음사
  10. 모종삼, "중국철학특강" (1985), 형설출판사
  11. 서동욱, "차이와 타자" (2000), 민음사
  12. 정재식, "한국 유교와 서양 문명의 충돌" (1995), 연세대출판부
  13. 최종철, "타자들" (1999), 백의
  14. 최태호, "송강문학논고" (2000), 역락
  15. 하정일, "탈식민의 미학" (2008), 소명출판
  16. 고봉준, "추방과 탈주: 타자·마이너리티·디아스포라", 작가와 비평, 6 (2007), 여름언덕
  17. 곽신환, "같음과 다름의 문제에 대한 조선조 후기 성리학적 접근", 공자학, 1(1) (1995), 한국공자학회
  18. 김갑기, "송강 정철의 한시 연구", 박사, pp.1984
  19. 김병국, "가면 혹은 진실-<관동별곡> 평설", 한국고전문학의 이해 (1995), 서울대학교출판부
  20. 김진욱, "屈原이 鄭澈 文學에 끼친 影響 硏究 -<思美人>과 <思美人曲>의 關係를 中心으로-", 고시가연구, 11(11), pp.71~87 (2003), 한국고시가문학회
  21. 김학성, "조선 후기 가사에 나타난 서민적 미의식", 국문학의 탐구 (1987), 성균관대출판부
  22. 박이문, "도와 이성 in : 동아시아, 문제와 시각" (1995), 문학과 지성사
  23. 박일용, "<만분가>의 형상화 형태 in ; 한국고전시가작품론" (1992), 집문당
  24. 서원섭, "사미인곡계 가사의 비교 연구", 가사문학연구 (1979), 정음사
  25. 윤덕진, "송강가사 전승사실의 맥락", 열상고전연구, 27 (2007), 열상고전연구회
  26. 윤사순, "성리학 사고의 명제적 검토", 퇴계학, 10(1) (1999), 안동대학교
  27. 이태진, "15·16세기 신유학 정착의 사회경제적 배경", 조선 유교 사회사론 (1989), 지식산업사
  28. 임수무, "親親之殺 에 관한 견해", 목요철학 발표집 (1998), 계명대학교 철학과
  29. 전일환, "<사미인곡>과 <만분가>의 관련성 in : 고전시가 엮어 읽기" (2003), 태학사
  30. 정익섭, "송강문학형성의 배경고 in : 가사문학연구" (1979), 정음사
  31. 조세형, "송강가사에 나타나 여성화자와 송강의 세계관", 한국고전여성문학연구, 4 (2002), 한국고전여성문학연구회
  32. 최미정, "조선 초·중기 여성화자 국문시가와 풍류", 어문학, 64 (1998), 어문학회
  33. 최상은, "연군가사의 짜임새와 미의식 in : 신편 고전시가론" (2002), 새문사
  34. 뚜웨이밍, "유가 철학과 현대화 in : 동아시아, 문제와 시각", pp.355~ (1995), 문학과 사상사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)