과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 논의 과정 요소의 특성에 관한 연구
A Study on the Characteristics of the Components of Argumentation in the Process of Solving Scientific Argument Tasks among Elementary Students
1
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of scientific argumentation and its development in the process of mutual discussion activities by elementary school students in the5th grade.The results of this study can be summarized as below: First, students used diversity argumentation components for solving the given argumentation theme, however, most students used the assertion or the basis of a simple expression of their own thoughts as a high ratio, and components of a one directional explanatory argumentation process rather than components of a mutual communicative argumentation process. Second, an asymmetric group showed a high- use ratio of communicative argumentation components and achieved argumentation activities harmoniously between a symmetric group and an asymmetric group in organization of groups for solving argumentation themes. It was found that students in the transitional period showed the highest rate of participation within the discussion process. Moreover, they also showed the highest rate of development of discussion skills whilst in the process of using scientific problems. In conclusion, this phenomenon is caused by highlighting the mutual action between the teacher and the student rather than placing an emphasis on the mutual action among students during field instructions.
참고문헌 (20)
- 남정희, "논의과정을 강조한 교수？학습 전략이 중학생들의 인지발달, 과학개념 이해, 과학관련 태도 및 논의과정에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), pp.450~461 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 권난주, "인지갈등에 의한 중학생의 과학개념 변화에서 학습자 특성의 영향", 박사, pp.2004
- 윤희원, "학교토론 교육의 난점", 학교토론문화의 효과적인 형성방안. 한국교원대 종합교원연수원, ~ (1999)
- 이하룡, "논의과정 활용 수업이 초등학생의 학습 동기와 과학태도에 미치는 영향", 초등과학교육, 24(2), pp.183~191 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 정규승, "초등학생의 논리적 사고력 측정을 위한 GALT 검사지 수정 제안", 석사, pp.1998
- 차영, "작용과 반작용에 관한 학습에서 토론을 통한 인지갈등과 개념변화", 한국과학교육학회지, 21(2), pp.411~421 (2001)
- Anderson, T., "Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students", Instructional Science, 29, pp.1~32 (2001)
- Billig, M., "Arguing and thinking : A rhetorical approach to social psychology" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Cazden, C. B., "Classroom discourse : the language of teaching and learning" (1988), Heinemann
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Kuhn, D., "Science argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking", Science Education, 77(3), pp.319~337 (1993)
- Kuhn, D., "Effects of dyadic interaction on reasoning", Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), pp.287~315 (1997)
- Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning, and values" (1992), Ablex
- Mason, L., "An analysis of children's construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions", International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), pp.411~433 (1996)
- McGuinness, C., "From thinking skills to thinking classroom: A review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils thinking(RR115)" (1999), DfEE
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argument in school science", School Science Review, 82(301), pp.63~70 (2001)
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the Quality of Argument in School Science", Paper presented at the 3rd meeting of the European Science Education Research Association (2001)
- Roadrangka, V., "The Construction and validation of group assessment of logical thinking(GALT)", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the NARST (1983)
- Rogers, E. N., "Scence is general education, In Science in general education" (1948), William C. Brown Co
- Voss, J. F., "Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation", Learning and Instruction, 1, pp.337~350 (1991)