과학 문제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생의 논증 특징
1
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of elementary students' argumentation in science problem solving process. For this study, the two argumentation topics were developed on the basis of Williams and Colomb's argumentation model. The topics of argumentation were the weight of the air and the change of volume according to state of water. The participants of this study were 6th grade students(n=51). Data were analyzed by Williams and Colomb's argumentation model and Kienpointner's argumentation style. The results of this study were as follows: In the argumentation model, most of students had the factors of claim, reason, evidence/ data in their statements. But low-achievement students had difficulty in warrant and acknowledge & response. In argumentation style, the frequency of the cause-effect and explanation of example style were higher than other argumentation styles. Some implications were suggested, such as understanding the characteristics of elementary students' argumentation activities and need of educational programs including scientific argumentation.
Abstract
This purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of elementary students' argumentation in science problem solving process. For this study, the two argumentation topics were developed on the basis of Williams and Colomb's argumentation model. The topics of argumentation were the weight of the air and the change of volume according to state of water. The participants of this study were 6th grade students(n=51). Data were analyzed by Williams and Colomb's argumentation model and Kienpointner's argumentation style. The results of this study were as follows: In the argumentation model, most of students had the factors of claim, reason, evidence/ data in their statements. But low-achievement students had difficulty in warrant and acknowledge & response. In argumentation style, the frequency of the cause-effect and explanation of example style were higher than other argumentation styles. Some implications were suggested, such as understanding the characteristics of elementary students' argumentation activities and need of educational programs including scientific argumentation.
참고문헌 (30)
- 권봉재, "과제변인에 따른 초등학생들의 과학적 논증의 유형과 수준 분석", 석사, pp.2008
- 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 민병곤, "논증적 텍스트의 생산과정에서 논증 도식의 운용 양상에 대한 분석 및 교육적 시사", 국어교육학연구, 18(18), pp.183~222 (2003), 국어교육학회
- 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- 박영신, "Exploring Scientific Argumentation from Teacher-Student Interaction with Epistemological and Psychological Perspectives", 한국지구과학회지, 31(1), pp.106~117 (2010), 한국지구과학회
- 양일호, "과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.203~220 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 위수민, "학생 특성에 따른 소그룹 논증 수준 분석", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.1~11 (2009), 과학교육연구소
- 이봉우, "탐구 토론에서 예비과학교사들의 논증 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(6), pp.739~751 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- 이선경*, "소집단 토론에서 발생하는 학생들의 상호작용적 논증 유형 및 특징", 대한화학회지, 50(1), pp.79~88 (2006), 대한화학회
- 이효녕, "학교과학교육에서의 논증활동 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), pp.666~679 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 임재근, "초등학교 영재 학생들의 탐구 활동에서 나타나는 논증 과정 평가 및 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.441~450 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Berry, A., "Helping students learn from laboratory work", Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(1), pp.27~31 (1999)
- Booth, W. C., "The craft of research (3rd ed.)" (2008), The University of Chicago Press
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84, pp.287~312 (2000)
- Edmondson, K. M., "The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), pp.547~559 (1993)
- Emeren, F. H., "Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Hodson, D., "Is this really what scientist do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory, In Practical work in school", pp.93~108 (1998), Routledge
- Hodson, D., "Becoming critical about pratical work: Changing views and changing practice through action research", International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), pp.683~694 (1998)
- Hogan, K., "Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusion", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), pp.663~687 (2001)
- Kienpointner, M., "How to classify arguments", pp.178~188 (1992)
- Krummheuer, G., "The ethnography of argumentation, In Emergence of mathematical meaning" (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Newton, P., "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), pp.553~576 (1999)
- Osborne, J. E., "Science without literacy: A ship wthout a sail?", Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), pp.203~215 (2002)
- Osborne, J., E., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, pp.994~1020 (2004)
- Toulmin, S. E., "The uses of argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Verlinden, J., "Critical thinking and everyday argument" (2005), Thomson & Wardsworth
- Walton, D. N., "Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning" (1996), LEA
- Wellington, J. J., "Practical work in science: Time for a reappraisal, In Practical work in school science", pp.3~15 (1998), Routledge
- Williams, J. M., "The craft of argument (3rd ed.)" (2007), Pearson Education, Inc
- Zohar, A., "Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in humane genetics", Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching, 39(1), pp.35~62 (2002)