초등학생의‘증거’사용에 따른‘과학적 정당화’활동의 분석
Analysis of Elementary Students' Scientific Justification Activities based on Evidence
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For this study, inquiry-based learning program was developed for promoting elementary students' scientific justification activities based on their uses of scientific evidences. The program was applied to the 5th grade science class to examine the types of evidences and major features of scientific justification activities. Analysis of the data showed that the evidences used by students were classified into knowledge-based evidence, experience-based evidence and authority-based evidence. As for students' justification features, this study reports three major cases: a case evolving evidence and justification to become more valid and logical, as inquiry activities progressed, other case maintaining less valid and illogical evidence and justification, and final case revealing passive and reluctant participation in the inquiry activities. Overall, students' participation in scientific justification process became more valid and relevant, while there were some students who were unable to make the relevant relations between evidences and claims they made. The educational implications were discussed to consider more effective ways to improve the scientific classroom environment through social knowledge construction.
Abstract
For this study, inquiry-based learning program was developed for promoting elementary students' scientific justification activities based on their uses of scientific evidences. The program was applied to the 5th grade science class to examine the types of evidences and major features of scientific justification activities. Analysis of the data showed that the evidences used by students were classified into knowledge-based evidence, experience-based evidence and authority-based evidence. As for students' justification features, this study reports three major cases: a case evolving evidence and justification to become more valid and logical, as inquiry activities progressed, other case maintaining less valid and illogical evidence and justification, and final case revealing passive and reluctant participation in the inquiry activities. Overall, students' participation in scientific justification process became more valid and relevant, while there were some students who were unable to make the relevant relations between evidences and claims they made. The educational implications were discussed to consider more effective ways to improve the scientific classroom environment through social knowledge construction.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김수미, "탐구토론과정에서 초등과학영재아 의사소통의 특징", 석사, pp.2008
- 김조연, "사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구실험의 효과 및 학생들의 인지수준에 따른 상호작용 분석", 과학교육 논문집, 11(1), pp.44~54 (2001)
- 김희경, "중학생의 동료간 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 물리 탐구: 조건, 특징, 역할을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2003
- 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- 심규철, "초등 교과서에서 제시된 과학 탐구 활동의 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(1), pp.24~31 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 이현영, "사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), pp.660~670 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
- 장신호, "과학적 증거 근거의 제시를 강조하는 과학 대화를 사용한 수업에 대한 예비 초등 교사들의 인식", 초등과학교육, 25(1), pp.96~108 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 전경문, "해결자·청취자 활동에서의 언어적 행동", 한국과학교육학회지, 20(4), pp.624~633 (2000)
- 정수진, "과학적 증거의 사용을 촉진하는 초등 과학 탐구 학습 프로그램의 개발 및 적용", 석사, pp.2008
- 장혜선, "과학적 증거와 설명에 대한 초등학교 6학년 학생의 이해", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(6), pp.634~649 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 조경희, "학생들의 수학적 정당화 유형과 논쟁 구조의 관계: 선형 연립 미분방정식의 탐구과정을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2004
- 진순희, "과학 탐구에 대한 초등 교사들의 지도 경험", 초등과학교육, 26(2), pp.181~191 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Bell, P., "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE", International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), pp.797~817 (2000)
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Gott, R., "Practical work: its role in the understanding of evidence in science", International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), pp.791~806 (1996)
- Kelly, G. J., "Students' reasoning about electricity; Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis", International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), pp.849~871 (1998)
- Miles, M. B., "Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.)" (1994), Sage
- National Research Council, "National science education standards", pp.262~ (1996), National Academy Press
- Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning, "National Research Council", National Research Council, ~ (2000)
- Newton, P., "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), pp.553~576 (1999)
- Tytler, R., "Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education", International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), pp.815~832 (2001)
- Watson, J. R., "Students’ discussions in practical scientific inquiries", International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), pp.25~45 (2004)
- Wu, S., "Developing sixth grader's inquiry skills to construct explanation in inquiry-based learning environment", International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), pp.1289~1313 (2006)
- Zembal-Saul, C., "Scaffolding preservice science teachers’ evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection", Research in Science Education, 32(4), pp.437~463 (2002)