朝鮮性理學 「未發工夫」 研究
A Study on the theory of self-cultivating at the state of pre-occurrence in Chosun Neo-Confucianism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
詮釋「未發」概念及其工夫, 堪稱決定宋明理學學脈的關鍵議題。 從二程門下發端的未發體認工夫, 到了朱子開始展現新的局面。 朱子通過其師李延平投入未發工夫, 後又與張南獻相互交流, 受到湖湘學的影響, 遂發表中和舊說。 但不久之後, 對湖湘學產生質疑, 便轉向於中和新說。 在朱子學建構上屬於關鍵性議題的未發工夫, 朝鮮性理學家亦視之為重要議題。 到了16世紀, 如南冥曹植、退溪李滉、栗谷李珥等代表朝鮮當代的一群學者, 他們不僅談論未發概念的氛圍相當活潑, 對未發工夫也加以認真試圖實踐。 自從16世紀起發端的未發議題, 經過17世紀更加熱烈談論, 直到18世紀已達登峰造極之勢。 在18世紀朝鮮性理學展開的主要論辯之一的「人物性同異論辨」中,「未發心體」正屬最重要的核心議題, 這一點足以證明此事實。 朝鮮性理學所展開「未發」相關的談論, 主要圍繞著「知覺」及「氣質」議題而進行。 「知覺」相關談論的焦點便落於未發時的「知覺不昧」。 與「氣質」相關的未發概念及其工夫的談論特徵, 可謂在於若說以往未發心體論的工夫主要強調存養這一面的單純結構, 南塘與巍巖的未發工夫論則進一步提出未發時氣質影響與否問題, 更加追求動態且重層的氣質變化。 朝鮮性理學所進行未發概念及其工夫相關的談論, 除了主要繼承朱子的未發論這一點之外, 另留下兩個問題。 第一, 在如何把李延平的未發體認與「知覺」結合而認識這一點上仍有異見*;第二, 與「氣質」結合的未發心體, 是否只不過是「氣」?抑或尚有與「理」相聯的可能性?等的問題。
Abstract
The purpose of this report is to research the theory of self-cultivating at the state of pre-occurrence in Chosun Neo-Confucianism. It would be a key solution to find the character of Chosun Neo-Confucianism in the point of thoughts and practice, and may help draw future research subjects. The self-cultivating at the state of pre-occurrence is one of the urgent problems in Neo-Confucianism not only at Chosun but also at China. All the representative Neo-confucianists in 16th Century, besides Cho Sik, Yi Hwang, Yi Yi, had studied this subject and practiced their own answer. The study of this was developed in 17th century, and reached the peak in 18th century. The theory of self-cultivating at the state of pre-occurrence had been discussed with the awareness and the human characters in Chosun Neo-Confucianism. For awareness, it has been discussed how one can have the state of awareness without thinking. And for human characters, the relation of Spirit itself and human characters was the theme. Is human spirit in the state of pre-occurrence free from the influence of human characters? If not, is it still in the influence of human characters? That’s the question. The conclusion of this paper is that the self-cultivating at the state of pre-occurrence in Chosun Neo-Confucianism can be estimated the develop of Neo-Confucianism but it still has two problems too. One is how can we understand Li Dong’s awareness in pre-occurrence theory, relevance to awareness. The other is the human spirit itself is only Qi or it can be related with Li.
참고문헌 (21)
- "二程遺書", ~
- "程氏遺書", ~
- "朱子大全", ~
- "朱子文集", ~
- "朱文公文集", ~
- "朱子語類", ~
- "性理大全", ~
- "自省錄", ~
- "栗谷全書", ~
- "牛溪集", ~
- "巍巖遺稿", ~
- "南塘集", ~
- "寓軒先生文集", ~
- "陶山及門諸賢集", ~
- "朱子言論同異考", ~
- 陳來撰, "주희의철학(朱熹的哲學)" (2002), 예문서원
- 大濱皓, "범주로 보는 주자학(原作者書名:朱子の哲學)≫" (1999), 예문서원
- 이봉규, "性理學에서未發의철학적문제와17세기畿湖學派의견해", 韓國思想史學, 13 (1999)
- 문석윤, "湖洛論爭 形成期 未發論辨의 樣相과 巍巖 ‘未發’論의 특징", 한국사상사학, (31), pp.409~444 (2008), 한국사상사학회
- 이승환, "남당(南塘) 미발론과 공부론의 현실적 함의", 철학연구, (40), pp.71~122 (2010), 철학연구소
- 이선열, "송시열(宋時烈)과우암학단(尤庵學團)의심론(心論)연구", 博士, 哲學系, pp.2010
