Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: A stability-measuring device that utilizes damping capacity analysis (DCA) has recently been introduced in the field of dental implantology. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of this device by measuring the implant stability of ex vivo samples in comparison with a resonance frequency analysis (RFA) device. Methods: Six implant beds were prepared in porcine ribs using 3 different drilling protocols to simulate various implant stability conditions. Thirty-six pork ribs and 216 bone-level implants measuring 10 mm in height were used. The implant beds were prepared using 1 of the following 3 drilling protocols: 10-mm drilling depth with a 3.5-mm-diameter twist drill, 5-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill, and 10-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill. The first 108 implants were external-connection implants 4.0 mm in diameter, while the other 108 implants were internal-connection implants 4.3 mm in diameter. The peak insertion torque (PIT) during implant placement, the stability values obtained with DCA and RFA devices after implant placement, and the peak removal torque (PRT) during implant removal were measured. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) results obtained using the RFA device at the medial, distal, ventral, and dorsal points were 0.997, 0.994, 0.994, and 0.998, respectively. The ICCs of the implant stability test (IST) results obtained using the DCA device at the corresponding locations were 0.972, 0.975, 0.974, and 0.976, respectively. Logarithmic relationships between PIT and IST, PIT and ISQ, PRT and IST, and PRT and ISQ were observed. The mean absolute difference between the ISQ and IST values on a Bland-Altman plot was −6.76 (−25.05 to 11.53, P <0.05). Conclusions: Within the limits of ex vivo studies, measurements made using the RFA and DCA devices were found to be correlated under a variety of stability conditions.
Abstract
Purpose: A stability-measuring device that utilizes damping capacity analysis (DCA) has recently been introduced in the field of dental implantology. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of this device by measuring the implant stability of ex vivo samples in comparison with a resonance frequency analysis (RFA) device. Methods: Six implant beds were prepared in porcine ribs using 3 different drilling protocols to simulate various implant stability conditions. Thirty-six pork ribs and 216 bone-level implants measuring 10 mm in height were used. The implant beds were prepared using 1 of the following 3 drilling protocols: 10-mm drilling depth with a 3.5-mm-diameter twist drill, 5-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill, and 10-mm drilling depth with a 4.0-mm-diameter twist drill. The first 108 implants were external-connection implants 4.0 mm in diameter, while the other 108 implants were internal-connection implants 4.3 mm in diameter. The peak insertion torque (PIT) during implant placement, the stability values obtained with DCA and RFA devices after implant placement, and the peak removal torque (PRT) during implant removal were measured. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) results obtained using the RFA device at the medial, distal, ventral, and dorsal points were 0.997, 0.994, 0.994, and 0.998, respectively. The ICCs of the implant stability test (IST) results obtained using the DCA device at the corresponding locations were 0.972, 0.975, 0.974, and 0.976, respectively. Logarithmic relationships between PIT and IST, PIT and ISQ, PRT and IST, and PRT and ISQ were observed. The mean absolute difference between the ISQ and IST values on a Bland-Altman plot was −6.76 (−25.05 to 11.53, P <0.05). Conclusions: Within the limits of ex vivo studies, measurements made using the RFA and DCA devices were found to be correlated under a variety of stability conditions.
참고문헌 (22)
- Oh JS, "A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability : Periotest and Osstell Mentor", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 107, pp.513~518 (2009)
- Zix J, "Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment : comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.525~530 (2008)
- Becker W, "Resonance frequency analysis : comparing two clinical instruments", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.308~312 (2018)
- Jaramillo R, "Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices : Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ", Implant Dent, 23, pp.351~356 (2014)
- Lages FS, "Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis : a systematic review", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.26~33 (2018)
- Choi HH, "Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss : an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor", Implant Dent, 23, pp.51~56 (2014)
- Bilhan H, "The evaluation of the reliability of Periotest for implant stability measurements : an in vitro study", J Oral Implantol, 41, pp.e90~5 (2015)
- Lekholm U, "Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry", pp.199~209 (1985), Quintessence
- Meredith N, "Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.261~267 (1996)
- Brizuela-Velasco A, "Relationship between insertion torque and resonance frequency measurements, performed by resonance frequency analysis, in micromobility of dental implants: an in vitro study", Implant Dent, 24, pp.607~611 (2015)
- Koo TK, "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", J Chiropr Med, 15, pp.155~163 (2016)
- 이정원, "Efficacy of sonic-powered toothbrushes for plaque removal in patients with peri-implant mucositis", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 45(2), pp.56~61 (2015), 대한치주과학회
- Geckili O, "A comparative in vitro evaluation of two different magnetic devices detecting the stability of osseo-integrated implants", J Periodontal Res, 47, pp.508~513 (2012)
- Atsumi M, "Methods used to assess implant stability : current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.743~754 (2007)
- Açil Y, "Correlation between resonance frequency, insertion torque and bone-implant contact in self-cutting threaded implants", Odontology, 105, pp.347~353 (2017)
- 한호철, "Primary implant stability in a bone model simulating clinical situations for the posterior maxilla: an in vitro study", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 46(4), pp.254~265 (2016), 대한치주과학회
- Santamaría-Arrieta G, "Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling technique on primary implant stability measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis", J Clin Exp Dent, 8, pp.e307~e311 (2016)
- Turkyilmaz I, "Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets : a human cadaver study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 11, pp.52~58 (2009)
- Lachmann S, "Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.80~84 (2006)
- Falco A, "Correlation between implant geometry, implant surface, insertion torque, and primary stability: in vitro biomechanical analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 33, pp.824~830 (2018)
- Lachmann S, "Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.75~79 (2006)
- Marquezan M, "Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.767~774 (2012)