Conceptual Metonymy in the Gospel of Mark
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study aims to investigate the metonymic expressions in the Gospel of Mark to find out what their characteristics are in terms of the cognitive linguistic view. 98 metonymic expressions are found: 97 metonymic expressions are classified as referential use, 1 expression as non-referential use; 47 expressions as intrinsic association, 51 expressions as extrinsic association, and there exist 26 different conceptual metonymic types in total. The study suggested that the interpretation of metonymy in the Gospel of Mark depends on its context, the cultural or religious belief, and the background knowledge of the situation in which the utterance is made; however, the way of conceptualizing in different ages and cultures seems to be similar or the same in some aspects. Religious symbolism such as cup, cross, etc., which is a special case of metonymy, is found.
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the metonymic expressions in the Gospel of Mark to find out what their characteristics are in terms of the cognitive linguistic view. 98 metonymic expressions are found: 97 metonymic expressions are classified as referential use, 1 expression as non-referential use; 47 expressions as intrinsic association, 51 expressions as extrinsic association, and there exist 26 different conceptual metonymic types in total. The study suggested that the interpretation of metonymy in the Gospel of Mark depends on its context, the cultural or religious belief, and the background knowledge of the situation in which the utterance is made; however, the way of conceptualizing in different ages and cultures seems to be similar or the same in some aspects. Religious symbolism such as cup, cross, etc., which is a special case of metonymy, is found.
참고문헌 (22)
- Barcelona, Antonio, "Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Carl, D. DuBois, "Metonymy and Synecdoche in the New Testament", pp.1~127 (1999), SIL International
- Clark, Herbert, "Psychology and Language" (1997), Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich
- Choi, Yoonyoung, "An Analysis of Figurative Speech in the Gospel of John", Ph.D., pp.2010
- 최윤영, "An Analysis of Metonymy in the Gospel of John", 언어과학연구, (56), pp.239~254 (2011), 언어과학회
- 최윤영, "Metonymy in the Gospel of Matthew", 영어영문학, 21(4), pp.73~90 (2016), 미래영어영문학회
- Croft, William, "Cognitive Linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Fauconnier, Gilles, "Mappings and Thought and Language" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Goossens, Louis, "By Word of Mouth. Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective", pp.159~174 (1995), John Benjamins
- Kövecses, Zoltán, "Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View", Cognitive Linguistics, 9, pp.37~77 (1998)
- Kövecses, Zoltán, "Metonymy in Language and Thought", pp.17~59 (1999), John Benjamins
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphor We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor" (1989), University of Chicago Press
- Langacker, Ronald, "Reference-Point Constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.1~38 (1993)
- Langacker, Ronald, "Grammar and Conceptualization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- "NIV English Bible" (1999)[URL]
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáne, "Metonymy and the Grammar: Motivation, Constraints and Interaction", Language & Communication, 21, pp.321~357 (2001)
- Saeed, John l., "Semantics" (1997), Blackwell
- Ungerer, Friedrich, "An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics" (1996), Longman
- Warren, Beatrice, "Studies in Anglistics", pp.137~150 (1995), Almqvist & Wiksell International
- Warren, Beatrice, "Historical Linguistics", pp.301~310 (1998), John Benjamins
- Warren, Beatrice, "Referential Metonymy" (2006), Almquiest and Wilksell International