Metonymy in the Gospel of Matthew
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study aims to investigate the metonymic expressions in the Gospel of Matthew and find out how they were used in those days. The results of the study are as follows: First, various types of metonymy were used in the Gospel of Matthew: PART FOR WHOLE, WHOLE FOR PART, CAUSE FOR EFFECT, ACTOR FOR ACTION, CONTAINER FOR CONTENT, and much more; second, metonymy is classified into four associations, i.e., spatial, temporal, sequential, and attributive; third, the non-referential use as well as the referential use of the metonymy in the Gospel of Matthew is found in the forms of 'nouns' and 'verbs'; fourth, different metonymic uses may underlie one single word; fifth, unlike the ordinary language, religious symbolism such as light and cross is often found in the Gospel of Matthew; finally, people including St. Matthew 2000 years ago had metonymic thinking like modern people.
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the metonymic expressions in the Gospel of Matthew and find out how they were used in those days. The results of the study are as follows: First, various types of metonymy were used in the Gospel of Matthew: PART FOR WHOLE, WHOLE FOR PART, CAUSE FOR EFFECT, ACTOR FOR ACTION, CONTAINER FOR CONTENT, and much more; second, metonymy is classified into four associations, i.e., spatial, temporal, sequential, and attributive; third, the non-referential use as well as the referential use of the metonymy in the Gospel of Matthew is found in the forms of 'nouns' and 'verbs'; fourth, different metonymic uses may underlie one single word; fifth, unlike the ordinary language, religious symbolism such as light and cross is often found in the Gospel of Matthew; finally, people including St. Matthew 2000 years ago had metonymic thinking like modern people.
참고문헌 (17)
- Carl, D., "Metonymy and synecdoche in the new testament", Notes on Translation, 23, pp.1~127 (1999)
- Choi, Y., "An analysis of figurative speech in the gospel of John", Ph.D, pp.2010
- 최윤영, "An Analysis of Metonymy in the Gospel of John", 언어과학연구, (56), pp.239~254 (2011), 언어과학회
- Croft, W., "Cognitive linguistics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Frisson, S., "The processing of metonymy : evidence from eye movements", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, pp.1366~1383 (1999)
- Gibbs, R., "The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Goossens, L., "Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions of linguistic action", Cognitive Linguistics, 1, pp.323~340 (1990)
- Kövecses, Z., "Metonymy : developing a cognitive linguistic view", Cognitive Linguistics, 9, pp.37~77 (1998)
- Kövecses, Z., "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.17~59 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- "Agape" (1999)[URL]
- Nunberg, G., "Transfers of meaning", Journal of Semantics, 17, pp.109~132 (1995)
- Ungerer, F., "An introduction to cognitive linguistics" (2006), Pearson Education Limited
- Warren, B., "Historical Linguistics 1995", pp.301~310 (1998), John Benjamins
- Warren, B., "Referential metonymy" (2006), Lund University Press
- Ruiz de Mendoza, F., "Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective", pp.109~132 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- Ruiz de Mendoza, F., "Metonymy and the grammar : motivation, constraints and interaction", Language & Communication, 21, pp.321~357 (2001)