Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of 2 thermally treated nickel-titanium reciprocating systems in simulated curved canals. Materials and Methods Forty simulated canals were prepared to apical size 25 using Reciproc Blue R25 (VDW) and WaveOne Gold Primary (Dentsply Sirona) instruments. Standard pre- and post-preparation images were taken and superimposed. The removal of resin material was measured at 5 standard points: the canal orifice, halfway between the canal orifice and the beginning of the curve, the beginning of the curve, the apex of the curve, and the end-point of the simulated canal. The data were analysed using the independent sample t-test with a 5% significance threshold. Results The canals in which Reciproc Blue R25 was used showed a significantly greater widening than those in which WaveOne Gold was used at 4 of the 5 measurement points (p < 0.05). The Reciproc Blue R25 instrument removed significantly more resin from the inner aspect of the curve at 2 of the 5 points and similar amounts at the remaining 3 points. At the 2 apical points, there was no significant difference between the Reciproc Blue R25 and WaveOne Gold Primary instruments. Conclusion Both instruments respected the original canal anatomy; however, WaveOne Gold resulted in a more conservative shape with less transportation.
Abstract
Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of 2 thermally treated nickel-titanium reciprocating systems in simulated curved canals. Materials and Methods Forty simulated canals were prepared to apical size 25 using Reciproc Blue R25 (VDW) and WaveOne Gold Primary (Dentsply Sirona) instruments. Standard pre- and post-preparation images were taken and superimposed. The removal of resin material was measured at 5 standard points: the canal orifice, halfway between the canal orifice and the beginning of the curve, the beginning of the curve, the apex of the curve, and the end-point of the simulated canal. The data were analysed using the independent sample t-test with a 5% significance threshold. Results The canals in which Reciproc Blue R25 was used showed a significantly greater widening than those in which WaveOne Gold was used at 4 of the 5 measurement points (p < 0.05). The Reciproc Blue R25 instrument removed significantly more resin from the inner aspect of the curve at 2 of the 5 points and similar amounts at the remaining 3 points. At the 2 apical points, there was no significant difference between the Reciproc Blue R25 and WaveOne Gold Primary instruments. Conclusion Both instruments respected the original canal anatomy; however, WaveOne Gold resulted in a more conservative shape with less transportation.
참고문헌 (18)
- Schilder H, "Cleaning and shaping the root canal", Dent Clin North Am, 18, pp.269~296 (1974)
- Peters OA, "Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution computed tomography", J Dent Res, 79, pp.1405~1409 (2000)[DOI]
- Walia HM, "An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files", J Endod, 14, pp.346~351 (1988)[DOI]
- Park H, "A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 91, pp.715~718 (2001)[DOI]
- McGuigan M, "Endodontic instrument fracture: causes and prevention", Br Dent J, 214, pp.341~348 (2013)[DOI]
- Yared G, "Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations", Int Endod J, 41, pp.339~344 (2008)[DOI]
- Plotino G, "Current assessment of reciprocation in endodontic preparation: a comprehensive review-part II: properties and effectiveness", J Endod, 41, pp.1939~1950 (2015)[DOI]
- [URL]
- [URL]
- De-Deus G, "Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files", J Endod, 43, pp.462~466 (2017)[DOI]
- Yang GB, "Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals", Int Endod J, 39, pp.791~799 (2006)[DOI]
- Bane K, "Root canal shaping by single-file systems and rotary instruments: a laboratory study", Iran Endod J, 10, pp.135~139 (2015)
- Avina Paranjpe B, "A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files", Quintessence Int, 45, pp.101~108 (2014)
- Giuliani V, "Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion", J Endod, 40, pp.1468~1471 (2014)[DOI]
- Gagliardi J, "Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals", J Endod, 41, pp.1718~1724 (2015)[DOI]
- Hieawy A, "Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments", J Endod, 41, pp.1134~1138 (2015)[DOI]
- Keskin C, "Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc and WaveOne Gold reciprocating instruments", J Endod, 43, pp.1360~1363 (2017)[DOI]
- Capar ID, "A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments", Int Endod J, 49, pp.119~135 (2016)[DOI]