Comparison of the centering ability of Wave·One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping ability of newly marketed single-file instruments, Wave·One (Dentsply-Maillefer) and Reciproc (VDW GmbH), in terms of maintaining the original root canal configuration and curvature,with or without a glide-path. Materials and Methods: According to the instruments used, the blocks were divided into 4 groups (n = 10): Group 1, no glide-path /Wave·One; Group 2, no glide-path / Reciproc; Group 3, #15 K-file / Wave·One; Group 4,#15 K-file / Reciproc. Pre- and post-instrumented images were scanned and the canal deviation was assessed. The cyclic fatigue stress was loaded to examine the crosssectional shape of the fractured surface. The broken fragments were evaluated under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) for topographic features of the cross-section. Statistically analysis of the data was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Results: The ability of instruments to remain centered in prepared canals at 1 and 2 mm levels was significantly lower in Group 1 (p < 0.05). The centering ratio at 3, 5, and 7 mm level were not significantly different. Conclusions: The Wave·One file should be used following establishment of a glidepath larger than #15. (Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(1):21-25)
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping ability of newly marketed single-file instruments, Wave·One (Dentsply-Maillefer) and Reciproc (VDW GmbH), in terms of maintaining the original root canal configuration and curvature,with or without a glide-path. Materials and Methods: According to the instruments used, the blocks were divided into 4 groups (n = 10): Group 1, no glide-path /Wave·One; Group 2, no glide-path / Reciproc; Group 3, #15 K-file / Wave·One; Group 4,#15 K-file / Reciproc. Pre- and post-instrumented images were scanned and the canal deviation was assessed. The cyclic fatigue stress was loaded to examine the crosssectional shape of the fractured surface. The broken fragments were evaluated under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) for topographic features of the cross-section. Statistically analysis of the data was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Results: The ability of instruments to remain centered in prepared canals at 1 and 2 mm levels was significantly lower in Group 1 (p < 0.05). The centering ratio at 3, 5, and 7 mm level were not significantly different. Conclusions: The Wave·One file should be used following establishment of a glidepath larger than #15. (Restor Dent Endod 2013;38(1):21-25)
참고문헌 (22)
- Johnson E, "Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25", .04 rotary instruments, 2008, pp.34, 1406~1409
- Shen Y, "Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use", J Endod, 32, pp.61~65 (2006)
- Plotino G, "Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments", Int Endod J, 45, pp.614~618 (2012)
- Sattapan B, "Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use", J Endod, 26, pp.161~165 (2000)
- Cheung GS, "Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination", Int Endod J, 38, pp.802~809 (2005)
- Roland DD, "The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments", J Endod, 28, pp.543~545 (2002)
- Peters OA, "ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT", Int Endod J, 36, pp.86~92 (2003)
- Berutti E, "Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments", J Endod, 30, pp.228~230 (2004)
- West JD, "The endodontic Glidepath: “Secret to rotary safety”", Dent Today, 29, pp.86~93 (2010)
- Blum JY, "Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient", J Endod, 29, pp.567~575 (2003)
- Schneider SW, "A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 32, pp.271~275 (1971)
- Roane JB, "The ‘balanced force’ concept for instrumentation of curved canals", J Endod, 11, pp.203~211 (1985)
- Roane JB, "Clockwise or counterclockwise", J Endod, 10, pp.349~353 (1984)
- Southard DW, "Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the Roane technique", J Endod, 13, pp.479~489 (1987)
- Weine FS, "The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape", J Endod, 1, pp.255~262 (1975)
- Dummer PM, "A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks", Int Endod J, 24, pp.63~66 (1991)
- Kum KY, "Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals", J Endod, 26, pp.719~723 (2000)
- Thomson SA, "Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1", Int Endod J, 30, pp.1~7 (1997)
- Baumann MA, "Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 88, pp.714~718 (1999)
- Schilder H, "Cleaning and shaping the root canal", Dent Clin North Am, 18, pp.269~296 (1974)
- Davis RD, "Effect of early coronal flaring on working length change in curved canals using rotary nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instruments", J Endod, 28, pp.438~442 (2002)
- Wu MK, "Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings", J Endod, 26, pp.210~216 (2000)