화물인도지시서의 법적 지위 - ship’s delivery order를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Legal Status of the Ship’s Delivery Order
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A delivery order is a document from a consignee, a shipper, or an owner of freight which orders the release of the transportation of cargo to another party. Usually the written order permits the direct delivery of goods to a carrier, warehouseman or other person who in the course of their ordinary business issues warehouse receipts or bills of lading. According to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992, a ship’s delivery order refers to any document which is neither a bill of lading nor a sea waybill but contains an undertaking which is given under or for the purposes of a contract for the carriage by sea of the goods to which the document relates, or of goods which include those goods. The ship’s delivery order was not regarded as a document of title at common law with the result that the transfer of the delivery order did not effect transfer of constructive possession of the goods. However under this law, title to sue is now vested in the lawful holder of a bill of lading, the consignee identified in a sea waybill or the person entitled to delivery order under a ship’s delivery order, irrespective of whether or not they are owners of the goods covered by the document. This study is focused on the legal status of the ship’s delivery order of the contract of carriage of goods by sea, so to speak, privity by attornment to delivery order and conflict between the holder in due course of bills of lading and the warehouseman.
Abstract
A delivery order is a document from a consignee, a shipper, or an owner of freight which orders the release of the transportation of cargo to another party. Usually the written order permits the direct delivery of goods to a carrier, warehouseman or other person who in the course of their ordinary business issues warehouse receipts or bills of lading. According to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992, a ship’s delivery order refers to any document which is neither a bill of lading nor a sea waybill but contains an undertaking which is given under or for the purposes of a contract for the carriage by sea of the goods to which the document relates, or of goods which include those goods. The ship’s delivery order was not regarded as a document of title at common law with the result that the transfer of the delivery order did not effect transfer of constructive possession of the goods. However under this law, title to sue is now vested in the lawful holder of a bill of lading, the consignee identified in a sea waybill or the person entitled to delivery order under a ship’s delivery order, irrespective of whether or not they are owners of the goods covered by the document. This study is focused on the legal status of the ship’s delivery order of the contract of carriage of goods by sea, so to speak, privity by attornment to delivery order and conflict between the holder in due course of bills of lading and the warehouseman.
참고문헌 (41)
- 서울지방법원, "국제거래ㆍ상사소송의 실무" (1997)
- 경익수, "하도지시서의 법적 성질", 한국해법학회지, 21(2) (1999)
- 권기훈, "화물인도지시서의 효력", 법학논총, 9 (2000), 경상대학교
- 김갑유, "국제항공화물운송의 법률관계", 국제거래법연구, 2 (1993)
- 김갑유, "해상운송에 있어서의 화물의 인도시점", 사법행정, (391) (1993)
- 김교창, "해상운송인의 화물인도의무", 인권과 정의, (167) (1990)
- 金? 濤, "중국 해상화물운송장의 이론과 실천", 한국해법학회지, 22(1) (2000)
- 김인현, "FIO 계약조건과 그 유효성 및 선상도의 법률관계", 상사판례연구, 1통권 : 19 (2006)
- 김창준, "복합운송주선업자의 법적 지위에 관한 연구-법해석론적 쟁점을 중심으로-", 박사, 경희대 대학원, pp.2004
- UNCITRAL 운송법 조약에서 논의되고 있는 인도 및 인도지연으로 인한 책임, 국제규범의 현황과 전망 2006년 국제규범연구반 연구보고, "김필곤", 법원행정처, ~ (2006)
- 문광명, "FIO 특약과 선상도", 한국해법학회지, 29(1) (2007)
- 박승락, "세관의 통관절차 간소화 조치에 따른 수입화물의 반출을 예방하기 위한 e-D", O활용지원 방안, 2004, pp.6(3), ~
- 박용섭, "하도지시서의 법률문제에 관한 고찰", 해사법연구, 8(2) (1996)
- 서동희, "국제항공화물인도와 관련된 법률문제", 한국해법학회지, 22(1) (2000)
- 서동희, "수입화물의 흐름에 대한 실무적 이해", 국제거래법연구, (2)통권 : 15 (2006)
- 유남석, "항공운송취급인의 수하인에 대한 불법행위책임", 대법원판례해설, (27) (1997)
- 이균성, "선하증권의 법률관계", 무역상무연구, 10 (1997)
- 이용근, "해상운송계약에 있어서 당사자관계에 관한 연구", 무역상무연구, 12 (1999)
- 이진홍, "선하증권이 회수되지 않은 운송물의 인도에 관한 법률관계", 한국해법학회지, 28(2) (2006)
- 이진홍, "운송물의 인도에 관한 법적 문제-보세구역에서의 불법인도를 중심으로", 한국해법학회지, 24(1) (2002)
- 정병윤, "선하증권에 관한 손해배상청구권과 화환어음상 환매청구권과의 관계", 상사판례연구, 9(1) (1998)
- 정재중, "국제해상 물품운송 중 손상된 화물에 관한 제소권자 -영연방ㆍ미합중국의 법리 및 UNCITRAL Preliminary Draft를 중심으로", 사법논집, 통권 : 37 (2003)
- 정해덕, "선하증권과 상환 없는 화물인도에 있어서의 운송인, 선박대리점, 창고업자의 책임", 인권과 정의, (360) (2006)
- 채동헌, "국제항공화물운송에 있어 화물의 불법반출과 그 책임", 인권과 정의, (296) (2001)
- 최종현, "보세창고업자의 화물 불법인도에 대한 운송인의 채무불이행책임", 한국해법학회지, 27(2) (2005)
- 최준선, "기명식 선하증권의 법적 성질- 판례평석", 한국해법학회지, 21(2) (1999)
- 江頭憲治郞, "荷渡指圖書の比較法的檢討", 海法會誌, (20) (1976), 勁草書房
- 落合誠一, "荷渡指圖書の性質と效力" (1993), 有斐閣
- ?田一男, "荷渡指圖書" (1963), 有斐閣
- 川又良之, "荷渡指圖書の效力" (1965), 有斐閣
- 石井照久, (1983), 勁草書房
- 小井谷操三, "海商法硏究" (1968), 勁草書房
- 長谷川雄一, "基本商法講義(海商法)" (1988), 成文堂
- 田中誠二, "海商法詳論" (1985), 勁草書房
- Baumbach, "Wechselgesetz und Scheckgesetz", Aufl, 19 (1995)
- Benjamin, "Sale of Goods" (2002), Maxwell & Sweet
- Hueck, "Recht der Wertpapiere", Aufl, 12 (1986)
- Paul Todd, "Bills of Lading and Bankers’ Documentary Credits" (1993), Lloyd’s of? London Press Ltd.
- C.M. Schmitthoff, "Export Trade-the Law and Practice of International Trade" (2000), Sweet & Maxwell
- Tetley, W., "Marine Cargo Claims" (1988), Blais
- Z?lner, "Wertpapierrecht", Aufl, 13 (1982)