실무에서 나타나는 다양한 선하증권과 그 대용물
Various Types of Bill of Lading and its Substitutes Engaged in the Shipping Practice
0
조회
0
다운로드
43
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Bill of Lading(B/L) has three functions such as a kind of contract for the carriage of goods by sea, a receipt of the goods and document of title. These functions of the B/L play great role in facilitating international trade between countries. However, some of functions impedes to the easy and fast receipt of the goods at the discharging port. The merchants have developed new methods to solve this problem. House B/L and Master B/L, Surrendered B/L, Delivery Order and Letter of Indemnity are those of good examples. The author tries to explain these various types of B/L engaged in the shipping practice in Korea, compared with the original negotiable B/L. The legal effects of these B/L are in doubt because Korean Commercial Code do not expressly stipulates on them. The House B/L rather than Master B/L is recognized as the B/L for negotiation to the issuing bank of L/C by the Korean courts. Whether the agreement in the rear side of the original B/L binds the holder of the surrendered B/L or not is in dispute in Korea. If the Korean maritime law does not catch up with the merchan’s practice on the new types of the B/L and its substitutes, the easy commercial transactions for the carriage of goods may be hampered due to legal uncertainty. In conclusion, the author makes several proposals to give legal certainty(foreseeability) to the stakeholders such as the carrier, shipper, consignee and banks who are involved in the various types of B/Ls engaged in the Korean shipping practice.
Abstract
The Bill of Lading(B/L) has three functions such as a kind of contract for the carriage of goods by sea, a receipt of the goods and document of title. These functions of the B/L play great role in facilitating international trade between countries. However, some of functions impedes to the easy and fast receipt of the goods at the discharging port. The merchants have developed new methods to solve this problem. House B/L and Master B/L, Surrendered B/L, Delivery Order and Letter of Indemnity are those of good examples. The author tries to explain these various types of B/L engaged in the shipping practice in Korea, compared with the original negotiable B/L. The legal effects of these B/L are in doubt because Korean Commercial Code do not expressly stipulates on them. The House B/L rather than Master B/L is recognized as the B/L for negotiation to the issuing bank of L/C by the Korean courts. Whether the agreement in the rear side of the original B/L binds the holder of the surrendered B/L or not is in dispute in Korea. If the Korean maritime law does not catch up with the merchan’s practice on the new types of the B/L and its substitutes, the easy commercial transactions for the carriage of goods may be hampered due to legal uncertainty. In conclusion, the author makes several proposals to give legal certainty(foreseeability) to the stakeholders such as the carrier, shipper, consignee and banks who are involved in the various types of B/Ls engaged in the Korean shipping practice.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김인현, "해상법" (2011), 법문사
- 김인현, "해상법연구" (2004), 삼우사
- 김인현, "해상법연구II" (2008), 삼우사
- 김현호, "한국의 도시와 지역" (2008), 박영사
- 서동희, "실무해상법해상보험법" (2007), 법문사
- 이균성, "해상법대계" (2010), KMI
- 유중원, "운송증권" (2009), 법률문화원
- 정동윤, "상법(하)" (2008), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
- 채이식, "상법IV" (2001), 박영사
- 최종현, "해상법상론" (2009), 박영사
- 최준선, "보험법해상법" (2010), 삼영사
- 中村眞澄, "箱井崇史, 海商法" (2010), 成文堂
- 落合誠一, "江頭憲治郞, 海法大系" (2003), 商事法務
- 戶田修三, "國際海上物品運送法" (1996), 靑林書林
- S. Girvin, "Carriage of Goods by Sea" (2011)
- J Wilson, "Carriage of Goods by Sea" (2010), Pitman
- In Hyeon Kim, "Transport Law in South Korea" (2011), Wolter Kluwer
- John Richardson, "Combined Transport Documents" (2000), LLP
- 김인현, "運送周旋人의 다양한 法的 地位에 따른 法律關係 - 海上運送周旋人을 중심으로 -", 안암법학, 통(26), pp.213~247 (2008), 안암법학회
- 김인현, "한국 해사법정 및 한국 준거법 활용현황과 그 활성화 방안", 한국해법학회지, 34(1), pp.53~87 (2012), 한국해법학회[DOI]
- 김인현, "슬로트 傭船의 法律關係에 대한 考察", 한국해법학회지, 25(1), pp.57~93 (2003), 한국해법학회
- 김인현, "引渡指示書(D", O)와 貨物先取保證狀(L, 한국해법학회지, pp.2011, 33(1)[DOI]
- 김인현, "2009년도 해상법 등 중요 판례 평석", 한국해법학회지, 32(2), pp.351~391 (2010), 한국해법학회
- 양석완, "계약운송인으로서 해상운송주선인의 법적 지위", 상사법연구, 29(2), pp.285~315 (2010), 한국상사법학회
- 정완용, "운송물의 수령없이 발행된 선하증권의 효력", 상사판례연구, 2(1) (1996)
- 최세련, "해상운송계약에서의 약관규제법의 적용", 한국해법학회지, 31(1), pp.71~98 (2009), 한국해법학회
- 최세련, "운송주선인의 법적 지위 및 히말라야 약관의 적용 범위 - 대법원 2007. 4. 27. 선고 2007다4943 판결의 평석 -", 한국해법학회지, 30(1), pp.115~138 (2008), 한국해법학회
- 최종현, "운송물의 인도와 관련된 제문제", 제3회 해상보험법에 관한 세미나 (1993)
- In Hyeon Kim, "Korean Maritime Law Update", JMLC, ~ (2007)
- 金仁顯, "大韓民國における運送人責任制限の排除", 法と政治, 59(1) (2008), 關西學院大學法政學會
- "海運集會所", 海事法硏究會誌, (215) (2012)
