Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally- printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally (3D)-printed materials after various surface treatments and artificial aging compared with that bonded to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-milled materials. Methods: Eighty cylindrical specimens were 3D printed and divided into the following four subgroups (n = 20 each) according to the surface treatment and artificial aging procedure. Group A, sandblasted with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (SA) and aging; group B, sandblasted with 30 μm silica-coated alumina particles (CO) and aging; group C, SA without aging; and group D, CO without aging. For the control group, 20 CAD-CAM PMMA-milled cylindrical specimens were sandblasted with SA and aged. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine (0.25 mm/min), examined at ×2.5 magnification for failure mode classification, and statistically analyzed (p = 0.05). Results: The retention obtained with the 3D-printed materials (groups A–D) was higher than that obtained with the PMMA-milled materials (control group). However, no significant difference was found between the study and control groups, except for group C (SA without aging), which showed significantly higher retention than the control group (PMMA-SA and thermocycling) (p = 0.037). Study groups A–D predominantly exhibited a cohesive specimen mode, indicating specimen fracture. Conclusions: Orthodontic brackets bonded to 3D-printed materials exhibit acceptable bonding strengths. However, 3D-printed materials are prone to cohesive failure, which may result in crown fractures.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally (3D)-printed materials after various surface treatments and artificial aging compared with that bonded to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-milled materials. Methods: Eighty cylindrical specimens were 3D printed and divided into the following four subgroups (n = 20 each) according to the surface treatment and artificial aging procedure. Group A, sandblasted with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (SA) and aging; group B, sandblasted with 30 μm silica-coated alumina particles (CO) and aging; group C, SA without aging; and group D, CO without aging. For the control group, 20 CAD-CAM PMMA-milled cylindrical specimens were sandblasted with SA and aged. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine (0.25 mm/min), examined at ×2.5 magnification for failure mode classification, and statistically analyzed (p = 0.05). Results: The retention obtained with the 3D-printed materials (groups A–D) was higher than that obtained with the PMMA-milled materials (control group). However, no significant difference was found between the study and control groups, except for group C (SA without aging), which showed significantly higher retention than the control group (PMMA-SA and thermocycling) (p = 0.037). Study groups A–D predominantly exhibited a cohesive specimen mode, indicating specimen fracture. Conclusions: Orthodontic brackets bonded to 3D-printed materials exhibit acceptable bonding strengths. However, 3D-printed materials are prone to cohesive failure, which may result in crown fractures.
참고문헌 (24)
- Pabari S, "Assessment of motivation and psychological characteristics of adult orthodontic patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.e263~72 (2011)
- Huser MC, "Effects of orthodontic bands on microbiologic and clinical parameters", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 97, pp.213~218 (1990)
- Cecilia Goracci, "Bracket bonding to polymethylmethacrylate-based materials for computer-aided design", manufacture of temporary restorations: Influence of mechanical treatment and chemical treatment with universal adhesives, 2019, pp.49(6), 404~412[DOI]
- Katreva I, "3D Printing-an alternative of conventional crown fabrication : a case report", J IMAB, 24, pp.2048~2054 (2018)
- Tahayeri A, "3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials", Dent Mater, 34, pp.192~200 (2018)
- Scotti CK, "Physical and surface properties of a 3D-printed composite resin for a digital workflow", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.614~ (2020)
- Hannig C, "Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures", J Adhes Dent, 8, pp.35~40 (2006)
- Major PW, "24-hour shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain using various adhesion promoters", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.322~329 (1995)
- Newman GV, "Adhesion promoters, their effect on the bond strength of metal brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.237~241 (1995)
- Gale MS, "Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations", J Dent, 27, pp.89~99 (1999)
- Heller H, "Load-bearing capacity of zirconia crowns screwed to multi-unit abutments with and without a titanium base : an in vitro pilot study", Materials(Basel), 12, pp.3056~ (2019)
- Elsaka SE, "Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD", CAM hybrid ceramic material, 2016, pp.104, 68~76
- Cozza P, "Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.851~856 (2006)
- de Pulido LG, "Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-plastic bracket systems in vitro", Am J Orthod, 83, pp.124~130 (1983)
- Özcan M, "Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex", Oper Dent, 38, pp.63~72 (2013)
- Brosh T, "Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.122~126 (1997)
- Cardoso RM, "Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate : effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system", Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac, 62, pp.16~22 (2021)
- Fox NA, "A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics", Br J Orthod, 21, pp.33~43 (1994)
- Oesterle LJ, "Effect of aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.716~720 (2008)
- Al Jabbari YS, "Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.649~655 (2014)
- Chay SH, "Effects of surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to provisional materials", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.577~ (2007)
- Klocke A, "Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing", Dent Mater, 21, pp.139~144 (2005)
- Blakey R, "Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.72~78 (2010)
- Albahri R, "Shear bond strength of provisional repair materials bonded to 3D printed resin", J Dent Sci, 16, pp.261~267 (2021)