본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Bracket bonding to polymethylmethacrylate-based materials for computer-aided design/manufacture of temporary restorations: Influence of mechanical treatment and chemical treatment with universal adhesives

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: To assess shear bond strength and failure mode (Adhesive Remnant Index, ARI) of orthodontic brackets bonded to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) blocks for computer-aided design/manufacture (CAD/CAM) fabrication of temporary restorations, following substrate chemical or mechanical treatment. Methods: Two types of PMMA blocks were tested: CAD-Temp® (VITA) and Telio® CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent). The substrate was roughened with 320-grit sandpaper, simulating a fine-grit diamond bur. Two universal adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU) and Assure Plus (AP), and a conventional adhesive, Transbond XT Primer (XTP; control), were used in combination with Transbond XT Paste to bond the brackets. Six experimental groups were formed: (1) CADTemp ®/SU; (2) CAD-Temp®/AP; (3) CAD-Temp®/XTP; (4) Telio® CAD/SU; (5) Telio® CAD/AP; (6) Telio® CAD/XTP. Shear bond strength and ARI were assessed. On 1 extra block for each PMMA-based material surfaces were roughened with 180-grit sandpaper, simulating a normal/medium-grit (100 mm) diamond bur, and brackets were bonded. Shear bond strengths and ARI scores were compared with those of groups 3, 6. Results: On CAD-Temp® significantly higher bracket bond strengths than on Telio® CAD were recorded. With XTP significantly lower levels of adhesion were reached than using SU or AP. Roughening with a coarser bur resulted in a significant increase in adhesion. Conclusions: Bracket bonding to CAD/CAM PMMA can be promoted by grinding the substrate with a normal/ medium-grit bur or by coating the intact surface with universal adhesives. With appropriate pretreatments, bracket adhesion to CAD/CAM PMMA temporary restorations can be enhanced to clinically satisfactory levels.

Abstract

Objective: To assess shear bond strength and failure mode (Adhesive Remnant Index, ARI) of orthodontic brackets bonded to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) blocks for computer-aided design/manufacture (CAD/CAM) fabrication of temporary restorations, following substrate chemical or mechanical treatment. Methods: Two types of PMMA blocks were tested: CAD-Temp® (VITA) and Telio® CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent). The substrate was roughened with 320-grit sandpaper, simulating a fine-grit diamond bur. Two universal adhesives, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU) and Assure Plus (AP), and a conventional adhesive, Transbond XT Primer (XTP; control), were used in combination with Transbond XT Paste to bond the brackets. Six experimental groups were formed: (1) CADTemp ®/SU; (2) CAD-Temp®/AP; (3) CAD-Temp®/XTP; (4) Telio® CAD/SU; (5) Telio® CAD/AP; (6) Telio® CAD/XTP. Shear bond strength and ARI were assessed. On 1 extra block for each PMMA-based material surfaces were roughened with 180-grit sandpaper, simulating a normal/medium-grit (100 mm) diamond bur, and brackets were bonded. Shear bond strengths and ARI scores were compared with those of groups 3, 6. Results: On CAD-Temp® significantly higher bracket bond strengths than on Telio® CAD were recorded. With XTP significantly lower levels of adhesion were reached than using SU or AP. Roughening with a coarser bur resulted in a significant increase in adhesion. Conclusions: Bracket bonding to CAD/CAM PMMA can be promoted by grinding the substrate with a normal/ medium-grit bur or by coating the intact surface with universal adhesives. With appropriate pretreatments, bracket adhesion to CAD/CAM PMMA temporary restorations can be enhanced to clinically satisfactory levels.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Turpin DL, "Need and demand for orthodontic services : the final report", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.151~152 (2010)
  2. Blakey R, "Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.72~78 (2010)
  3. Rambhia S, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to provisional crown materials utilizing two different adhesives", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.784~789 (2009)
  4. Dias FM, "Evaluation of an alternative technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns", Dental Press J Orthod, 20, pp.57~62 (2015)
  5. Goymen M, "Effect of different temporary crown materials and surface roughening methods on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets", Photomed Laser Surg, 33, pp.55~60 (2015)
  6. Al Jabbari YS, "Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.649~655 (2014)
  7. de Almeida JX, "Effects of surface treatment of provisional crowns on the shear bond strength of brackets", Dental Press J Orthod, 18, pp.29~34 (2013)
  8. Chay SH, "Effects of surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to provisional materials", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.577e7~577e11 (2007)
  9. Göncü Başaran E, "Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computeraided design--computer-aided manufacturingfabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite", Acta Odontol Scand, 69, pp.144~150 (2011)
  10. Alt V, "Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures : CAD", CAM versus directly fabricated restorations, 2011, pp.27, 339~347
  11. Stawarczyk B, "Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD", CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic : effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing, 2012, pp.31, 377~383
  12. Perdigão J, "Universal adhesives", J Esthet Restor Dent, 27, pp.331~334 (2015)
  13. Rosa WL, "Bond strength of universal adhesives : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Dent, 43, pp.765~776 (2015)
  14. Hellak A, "Enamel shear bond strength of two orthodontic self-etching bonding systems compared to Transbond™ XT", J Orofac Orthop, 77, pp.391~399 (2016)
  15. Hellak A, "Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials", Biomed Res Int, 2016, pp.6307107~ (2016)
  16. Gaur A, "Effects of adhesion promoter on orthodontic bonding in fluorosed teeth : a scanning electron microscopy study", J Orthod Sci, 5, pp.87~91 (2016)
  17. Reichheld T, "Clinical significance of bis-GMA and HEMA orthodontic resins bonding to enamel and ceramic materials", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 37, pp.e5~e8 (2016)
  18. Mehta AS, "Bonding of metal orthodontic attachments to sandblasted porcelain and zirconia surfaces", Biomed Res Int, 2016, pp.5762785~ (2016)
  19. Wiegand A, "Repairability of CAD", CAM high-density PMMA-and composite-based polymers, 2015, pp.19, 2007~2013
  20. 이정환, "Resin bonding of metal brackets to glazed zirconia with a porcelain primer", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(6), pp.299~307 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
  21. Ostby AW, "Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.203~208 (2008)
  22. Van Landuyt KL, "Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives", Biomaterials, 28, pp.3757~3785 (2007)
  23. Amaral M, "The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia", J Dent, 42, pp.90~98 (2014)
  24. Reynolds IR, "A review of direct orthodontic bonding", Br J Orthod, 2, pp.171~178 (1975)
  25. Finnema KJ, "In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.615.e3~622.e3 (2010)
  26. Eliades T, "The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols", Eur J Orthod, 22, pp.13~23 (2000)
  27. Eliades T., "Comparing bond strengths", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.13A~15A (2002)
  28. Eliades T, "Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials : the picture we miss and its clinical relevance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 127, pp.403~412 (2005)
  29. Goracci C, "Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self-adhering flowable resin composite", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.609~617 (2013)
  30. Fleming PS, "Limited evidence suggests no difference in orthodontic attachment failure rates with the acid-etch technique and self-etch primers", Evid Based Dent, 15, pp.48~49 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally- printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial agingAmeer Biadsee, Carol Khalil, Joel Blushtein, Ofir Rosner, Shifra Levartovsky, Vanina Atanasova대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2023 · 제53권 제1호Comparison of bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces using different zirconia primers and a universal adhesive박정원, Jaechan Ahn, Ji-Yeon Lee, Sang In An대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2018 · 제43권 제1호Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations김성훈, 정기원대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2019 · 제11권 제2호Bonding of conventional provisional resin to 3D printed resin: the role of surface treatments and type of repair resins신수연, 임나경대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제5호Influence of different universal adhesives on the repair performance of hybrid CAD-CAM materialsGülbike Demirel, İsmail Hakkı Baltacıoğlu대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2019 · 제44권 제3호Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materialsAliye Tuğçe Gürcan, Burak Gümüştaş, Rana Turunç-Oğuzman, Soner Şişmanoğlu, Zuhal Yıldırım-Bilmez대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)