본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

From Access to Action: Open Government Platforms as Tools for Resilient Citizen Participation in Kazakhstan

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Kazakhstan’s adoption of open government platforms represents a strategic effort to enhance transparency, accountability, and civic engagement within its evolving digital governance landscape. This study investigates the participatory effectiveness of five major portals, focusing on Astana as a case study. The research combines a binary GSEM analysis of survey data with a qualitative evaluation of portal features to examine how citizen awareness, access behavior, and perceived challenges shape e-participation outcomes. Results reveal a significant indirect effect of awareness on participation via portal access, but also highlight how technical difficulties, lack of responsiveness, and privacy concerns moderate this pathway. The portal evaluation further contextualizes these findings, showing uneven responsiveness and limited interactivity across platforms. These constraints reduce the resilience potential of digital tools during crises, where timely feedback and inclusive decision-making are critical. The study concludes with targeted recommendations to improve usability, trust, and institutional responsiveness, emphasizing that meaningful digital engagement is essential for crisis preparedness and participatory governance in semi-authoritarian contexts.

Abstract

Kazakhstan’s adoption of open government platforms represents a strategic effort to enhance transparency, accountability, and civic engagement within its evolving digital governance landscape. This study investigates the participatory effectiveness of five major portals, focusing on Astana as a case study. The research combines a binary GSEM analysis of survey data with a qualitative evaluation of portal features to examine how citizen awareness, access behavior, and perceived challenges shape e-participation outcomes. Results reveal a significant indirect effect of awareness on participation via portal access, but also highlight how technical difficulties, lack of responsiveness, and privacy concerns moderate this pathway. The portal evaluation further contextualizes these findings, showing uneven responsiveness and limited interactivity across platforms. These constraints reduce the resilience potential of digital tools during crises, where timely feedback and inclusive decision-making are critical. The study concludes with targeted recommendations to improve usability, trust, and institutional responsiveness, emphasizing that meaningful digital engagement is essential for crisis preparedness and participatory governance in semi-authoritarian contexts.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)