본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혁신도입의 지속성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구-미국 지방정부의 시지배인의 제도적 압력과 탐색기술에 대한 인식을중심으로-

The Dynamics on Innovation Adoption -The Role of City Managers’ Discovery Skills and Perception on Isomorphic Pressures in Adopting Innovative Practices in U.S. Municipalities-

정우성
한국지방자치학회 (Korean Association For Local Government Studies)|2013.12|한국지방자치학회보 (Journal of Local Government Studis)|제25권 제4호|pp. 79-106

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

제도적 동형화혁신도입의 지속성시지배인기업가적 태도탐색기술Sustainable Innovation AdoptionCity ManagerEntrepreneurial AttitudeDiscovery SkillInstitutional Isomorphism
주제분류정치외교학

초록

본 연구는 ICMA 에 의해 실시된 미국 지방정부에서 도입된 지속가능한 환경정책 (sustainability practices)에 관한 4차례의 설문조사 결과를 바탕으로 하여, 지속적으로 높은 수준의 혁신정책도입에 성공한 지방정부들에 정책전문가(CEOs)의 기업가적 태도(entrepreneurial attitudes)와 탐색적 기술(discovery skills), 그리고 동형화 압력(isomorphic pressures)에 대한 인식이 어느 정도 상관성을 가지는 지를 검토하였다. 특히 본 연구에서는 강제적, 규범적 동형화 압력이라는 제도적 제약하에서의 CEOs 들의 탐색행위의 역할이 혁신 도입에 있어서 지속적으로 높은 도입수준 (early adopters) 혹은 지속적으로 낮은 도입수준을 보여준 조직들(late adopters)에 어떻게 다르게 연관되어 있는가를 설명하고자 하였다. 본 연구는 시지배인들의 기업가적 태도나 탐색 기술, 제도적 차원의 동형화 압력을 통한 설명이 일시적인 혁신도입수준뿐만 아니라 일정 기간 지속된 서로 다른 혁신들의 도입수준을 설명하는데 있어서도 일정부분 적용할 수 있음을 그 결과로 제시하였다.

Abstract

Research on government innovation has focused on identifying factors that contributeto higher levels of innovation adoption. Even though various factors have been testedas contributors to high levels of innovation adoption, the independent variables havebeen predominantly contextual and community characteristics. Previous empiricalstudies shed little light on chief executive officers(CEOs)’ attitudes, values, andbehaviors. Result has also varied with the type of innovation examined. This studyexamines how CEOs’ entrepreneurial attitudes and discovery skills, and institutionalmotivations account for high and low sustaining levels of innovation over time bytracking how much their governments have adopted innovations from the past to thepresent. As the result, early adopter group had relatively large scores ofentrepreneurial attitudes and discovery skills compared to late adopter group. Theseresults imply that early adopters that had sustained high adoption follow differentpaths in adopting innovation from late adopter group. That is, organizations thatbelonged consistently to early adopter group proactively responded to normativeinfluence, whereas the consistent late adopter group stayed passive to change unlessthey experienced coercive pressure. This study sheds light on the discovery skills andinstitutional isomorphic pressures that influence the adoption of different types ofinnovations in local governments.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. 김병섭, "휴먼조직론" (2008), 대영문화사
  2. 김일경, "경영혁신에 관한 제도적 압력이 혁신 성과에 미치는 영향", 인적자원관리연구, 17(2), pp.163~182 (2010), 한국인적자원관리학회
  3. 김태은, "제도의 유사성과 이질성의 원인에 관한 연구: 적기시정조치제도를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 46(4), pp.233~263 (2012), 한국행정학회
  4. 최창수, "행정개혁, 절반의 성공: 신제도주의 동형화 관점에서의 사례분석", 한국사회와 행정연구, 19(3), pp.1~23 (2008), 서울행정학회
  5. Abrahamson, E., "Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations", Academy of Management Review, 16(3), pp.586~612 (1991)
  6. Bebbington, J., "An Account of Sustainability: Failure, Success and Reconceptualization", Critical Perspective and Accounting, 12, pp.557~587 (2000)
  7. Bingham, R. D., "The Adoption of Innovation by Local Governments" (1976), Lexington Books
  8. Borins, S., "The Challenge of Innovating in Government: IBM Center for The Business of Government", ~ (2006)
  9. correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, "Applied multiple regression", pp.2003, Cohen, J.
  10. Collins, O. F., "The organization makers: A behavioral study of independent entrepreneurs" (1970), Appleton-Century-Crofts
  11. Daft, R. L., "A dual-core model of organizational innovation", Academy of Management Journal, 21, pp.193~210 (1978)
  12. Dahl, R., "Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city" (1961), Yale University Press
  13. Damanpour, F., "Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, pp.495~522 (2009)
  14. Damanpour, Fariborz, "Research on organizational innovation:Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23, pp.269~291 (2006)
  15. Damanpour, Fariborz, "Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization, and top managers", British Journal of Management, 17, pp.215~236 (2006)
  16. Davis, Duane, "Perceived Environ mental Turbulence and Its Effects on Selected Entrepreneurship, Marketing, and Organizational Characteristics in Industrial Firms", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(1), pp.43~51 (1991)
  17. DiMaggio, P. J., "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields", American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp.147~160 (1983)
  18. DiMaggio, P.J., "The Iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, In The new institutionalism in organization analysis" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  19. Downs, George W., Jr., "Conceptual issues in the study of innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, pp.700~714 (1976)
  20. Dyer, J., "The Innovator’s DNA", Harvard Business Review (2009)
  21. Dyer, J., "The innovator's DNA: mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators" (2011), Harvard Business Review Press
  22. Jun, Kyu-Nahm, "Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government", Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 20, pp.521~541 (2010)
  23. Kearney C, "Public and private sector entrepreneurship:Similarities, differences or a combination?", Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(1), pp.26~46 (2009)
  24. Kearney, Richard C., "reinventing government:City manager attitudes and actions", Public Administration Review, 60(6), pp.535~547 (2000)
  25. Keys, P. R., "Administrative entrepreneurship in the public sector", Administration in Social Work, 12, pp.59~68 (1988)
  26. Kim, Younhee, "A Multidimensional Model of Public Entrepreneurship", 박사, pp.2007
  27. Kim,Seok Eun, "The quality of management and government innovation: An empirical study", The 9th Public Management Research Conference (2007), University of Arizona
  28. Kimberly, John R., "Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations", Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), pp.689~713 (1981)
  29. Kwon, Myungjung, "Understanding the Adoption and Timing of Economic Development Strategies in US Cities Using Innovation and Institutional Analysis", Journal of Public Administration Research and Development, 19(4), pp.967~988 (2009)
  30. Lewis, Eugene, "Public Entrepreneurship: Toward a Theory of Bureaucratic Political Power" (1984), Indiana University Press
  31. Mack, W. R., "Innovation and implementation in the public sector:An examination of public entrepreneurship", Review of Policy Research, 25, pp.233~252 (2008)
  32. March, J. G., "The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life", American Political Science Review, 78(3), pp.734~749 (1984)
  33. March, J. G., "Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics" (1989), Free Press
  34. Meyer, John W., "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 83, pp.340~363 (1976)
  35. Mintzberg, H., "The structuring of organization" (1979), Prenctice-Hall
  36. Moon, M. J., "The pursuit of managerial entrepreneurship: Does organization matter?", Public Administration Review, 59, pp.31~43 (1999)
  37. Moon, M. J, "Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion among Municipalities", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, pp.327~352 (2001)
  38. Morris, M. H., "Entrepreneurial Intensity: Sustainable Advantages for Individuals, Organizations and Societies" (1998), Quorum Books
  39. Morris, M. H., "Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24, pp.71~91 (1999)
  40. Nice, David. C., "Policy Innovation in State Government" (1994), Iowa State University Press
  41. Oliver, C., "Strategic responses to institutional processes", Academy of Management Review, 16(1), pp.145~179 (1991)
  42. Palmer, Donald A., "Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large U.S. Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts", Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), pp.100~131 (1993)
  43. Rivera, Mark D., "Reinventing government in council manager cities", Public Performance & Management Review, 24(2), pp.121~132 (2000)
  44. Roberts, N. C., "Transforming public policy: Dynamics of policy entrepreneurship and innovation" (1996), Jossey-Bass Publishers
  45. Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of innovations" (1995), Free Press
  46. Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of innovations" (2003), Free Press
  47. Salazar, G. M., "The public entrepreneur: An empirical study", pp.1992
  48. Slevin, D. P., "Juggling entrepreneurial style and organizational structure-How to get your act together", Sloan Management Review, 31, pp.43~53 (1990)
  49. Suchman, M. C., "Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches", Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.571~610 (1995)
  50. Svara, James H., "Dichotomy and duality: Reconceptualizing the relationship between policy and administration in council-manager cities, In Ideal and practice in council-manager government" (1995), ICMA
  51. Svara, James H., "A Study of the Scope and Dynamics of Innovation in City Government", Unpublished Paper presented at Annual Conference of American Society for Public Administration (2008)
  52. Svara, James H., "Are Elected Executives Needed to Achieve Accountability to Citizens? Performance Issues and Form of Government in Large U.S. Cities, In Public Sector Leadership: International Challenges and Perspectives" (2009), Edward Elgar
  53. Tolbert, P.S., "Institutional Sources of change in the formal structure of organziations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935", Administrative Scinece Quarterly, 28(1), pp.22~39 (1983)
  54. Van de Ven, A., "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation", Management Science, 32, pp.590~607 (1986)
  55. Walker, J. L., "The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States", American Political Science Review, 63(3), pp.880~899 (1969)
  56. Walker, R. M., "Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government", Public Administration, 84(2), pp.311~335 (2006)
  57. Walker, R. M., "An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a configuration approach", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), pp.591~615 (2008)
  58. Walker, R. M., "Using multiple-informants in public administration:Revisiting the managerial values and actions debate", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), pp.417~434 (2004)
  59. Westphal, J. D., "Customization or conformity? An institution and network perspective on the cpontent and consequences of TQM adoption", Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), pp.366~394 (1997)
  60. Wilson, David. C., "Organizational Change Management, In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior Volume 2", pp.409~423 (2009), SAGE Publications
  61. Wolfe, R. A., "Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions", Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), pp.405~431 (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

지방정부의 공공서비스 혁신방안 도입요인에 관한 연구: 지역사회서비스 혁신사업의 사례권오영, 김윤미, 이은국재단법인 경기연구원 · GRI연구논총2010 · 제12권 제3호한국 지방정부의 정책혁신성 결정요인 분석: 혁신성 고-저에 따른 비교분석조근식(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2014 · 제28권 제1호지역 및 지방자치단체의 혁신성(Innovativeness)이 지역정보화 정책 도입에 미치는 영향 분석 - 광역자치단체를 중심으로 -고종안, 임채홍, 황석준한국자치행정학회 · 한국자치행정학보2024 · 제38권 제2호지방공무원의 혁신성향박국흠한국조직학회 · 한국조직학회보2008 · 제5권 제1호지방행정혁신추진평가와확산전략고승희(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2007 · 제21권 제1호지방정부 정책결정자의 행정이념과 혁신지지윤두섭한국공공관리학회 · 한국공공관리학보2005 · 제19권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

재정분권이 경제성장에 미치는 영향 -메타분석을 통한 효과크기 검증-조민경, 김렬pp. 7-30지방자치제 출범 전후의 투자적 지출의지역총생산과의 연관관계와 산출효과 비교분석-광역자치단체 간의 비교-정용석pp. 31-54한국지방자치학의 연구특성에 관한 분석-KCI인용지수를 중심으로-이승철pp. 55-78지방자치단체 공무원의 신기술반응이 조직유효성에미치는 영향-테크노스트레스와 역할스트레스의 매개효과를 중심으로-유일, 김선명, 최혁라pp. 107-134시·군 통합의 정책네트워크 분석-청주시와 청원군의 통합을 중심으로-장황래, 김영종pp. 135-172
원문 보기