국어 총칭 피동문의 유형과 의미
Semantics and Classification of the Korean Generic Passive Sentence
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper’s aims are as follows: (i) to examine the properties of the Koreangeneric passive sentence with the potential meaning, (ii) to classify two types,the instrumental generic passive sentence and the theme generic passivesentence, and (iii) to explain the generic meaning interpretation of these twotypes of the generic passive sentence by the Generative Lexicon Theory. Above all, we can classify the two types of the Korean generic passivesentence according to the thematic role of the subject, instrumental or theme. Considering the syntactic and semantic properties, the instrumental genericpassive sentence has more generic meaning than the theme one. In the case ofthe theme generic passive has the ambiguity, the generic meaning and specificpassive meaning. Based on the fact that the generic interpretation of the nounresult from the telic role of its lexical-semantic structure, we suggest that thegeneric meaning of the instrumental generic passive sentence is derived fromthe relationship between the telic role of the noun’s semantic structure and theagentive role of the passive verb’s semantic structure, but that the genericmeaning of the theme passive sentence is derived from the formal role of thepassive verb’s semantic structure. Also the subject of the instrumental genericone is not the argument of the passive verb, while the subject of the themegeneric oner is the argument. This is the reason that the theme generic onehas ambiguity. To conclusion, the difference of two type generic passivesentences is decided on which role of the qualia structure contributes to thesemantic interpretation in the lexical-semantic structure.
Abstract
This paper’s aims are as follows: (i) to examine the properties of the Koreangeneric passive sentence with the potential meaning, (ii) to classify two types,the instrumental generic passive sentence and the theme generic passivesentence, and (iii) to explain the generic meaning interpretation of these twotypes of the generic passive sentence by the Generative Lexicon Theory. Above all, we can classify the two types of the Korean generic passivesentence according to the thematic role of the subject, instrumental or theme. Considering the syntactic and semantic properties, the instrumental genericpassive sentence has more generic meaning than the theme one. In the case ofthe theme generic passive has the ambiguity, the generic meaning and specificpassive meaning. Based on the fact that the generic interpretation of the nounresult from the telic role of its lexical-semantic structure, we suggest that thegeneric meaning of the instrumental generic passive sentence is derived fromthe relationship between the telic role of the noun’s semantic structure and theagentive role of the passive verb’s semantic structure, but that the genericmeaning of the theme passive sentence is derived from the formal role of thepassive verb’s semantic structure. Also the subject of the instrumental genericone is not the argument of the passive verb, while the subject of the themegeneric oner is the argument. This is the reason that the theme generic onehas ambiguity. To conclusion, the difference of two type generic passivesentences is decided on which role of the qualia structure contributes to thesemantic interpretation in the lexical-semantic structure.
참고문헌 (31)
- 고광주, "국어의 능격성 연구" (2001), 월인
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 김윤신, "파생동사의 어휘의미구조 : 사동화와 피동화를 중심으로", 박사, 언어학, pp.2001
- 김윤신, "한국어 동사의 어휘의미구조와 피동화의 제약", 언어학, (30), pp.89~112 (2001), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 김윤신, "한국어 피동문의 총칭적 의미", 2013년 한국언어정보학회 정기학술대회 논문집, pp.22~30 (2013)
- 남수경, "‘-어지다’ 意味 考察에 대한 試論 - 類型論的 觀點에서 -", 어문연구(語文硏究), 39(3), pp.175~202 (2011), 한국어문교육연구회
- 남수경, "‘-히-’계 접미사 구문의 한 유형에 대한 고찰 - 한국어 가능 피동의 특성을 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 37, pp.77~102 (2012), 한국어의미학회
- 목정수, "한국어 피동문의 구조와 가능(potential)의 의미 해석-대조적 관점에서-", 인문언어, 30(8), pp.369~387 (2006), 국제언어인문학회
- 박철우, "국어의 태 범주: 통사부와 의미부의 접면 현상", 한국어학, 37, pp.207~228 (2007), 한국어학회
- 시라이시 치에미, "한국어의 태와 이른바 피동표현", 문창어문논집, 39, pp.23~498 (2002)
- 시라이시 치에미, "피동표현과 가능 속성 구문", 우리말연구, (23), pp.113~138 (2008), 우리말학회
- 이정미, "영어 중간문의 총칭성", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.81~100 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- 임홍빈, "국어 문법의 심층 3: 어휘 범주의 통사와 의미" (1998), 태학사
- 전영철, "총칭성과 양화", 한국어 의미학, 39, pp.51~76 (2012), 한국어의미학회
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음문화사
- Fagan, S. M. B, "The English Middle", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.181~203 (1988)
- Fellbaum, C, "On the middle construction in English" (1986), Indiana University Linguistic Club
- Grimshaw, J, "Argument Structure" (1990), the MIT Press
- Haspelmath, M, "Transivity Alternations of the Anticausative Type" (1987), Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität zu Köln
- Haspelmath, M, "The Grammatialization of Passive Morphology", Studies in Language, 14(1), pp.25~72 (1999)
- Iwata, S, "On the status of an implicit arguments in middles", Journal of Linguistics, 35(3), pp.527~572 (1999)
- Keyser, S. J, "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15(3), pp.381~416 (1984)
- Krifka, M, "The Generic Book", pp.1~124 (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Lee, C, "Abstract Syntax and Korean with Reference to English", 박사, pp.1973
- 이정민, "Genericity and Topicality: Towards Dynamic Genericity", 언어과학, 18(1), pp.233~251 (2011), 한국언어과학회
- Levin B, "Lexical & Conceptual Semantics" (1991), the MIT Press
- Levin B, "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), the MIT Press
- Moravcsik, J. M, "Thought and Language" (1990), Routledge
- Pustejovsky, J, "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), the MIT Press
- Shibatani, M, "Passive and Related Constructions: a Proto Type Analysis", Language, 61, pp.821~848 (1985)
- Yeon, J, "The Korean Causative-Passive Correlation Revisited", Language Research, 27(2), pp.337~358 (1991)