한국어 문법론에서 중동태의 설정을 위하여
For the establishment of middle voice in the studies in Korean grammar
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study describes the grammatical and semantic characteristics of the middle, which is distinguished from other types of voice, in order to set the middle voice in the studies in Korean grammar. In particular, this study explains the representation of the property of a subject, usage of the present tense of a verb, representation of genericity, the responsibility or cause of property that lies with a subject, implication of random and multiple agents, and the usage of manner verbs. In addition, this study examines whether the infinitive characteristics of the passive appears in a middle sentence. As a result, the argument was confirmed that a middle sentence and a corresponding active sentence cannot become synonymous sentences with mutual entailment while the sentences cannot be deemed to represent separate events. Additionally, an oblique that has a semantic role of an instrument is promoted to the subject of a middle sentence. However, because the oblique shares the same characteristics as the adjunct middle of the Dutch language, it could be accepted as the middle. Also, the fact that the middle is generally and cross-linguistically marked as a passive marker could be confirmed. Based on the results, this study concludes that the middle can be acknowledged in studies in Korean grammar.
Abstract
This study describes the grammatical and semantic characteristics of the middle, which is distinguished from other types of voice, in order to set the middle voice in the studies in Korean grammar. In particular, this study explains the representation of the property of a subject, usage of the present tense of a verb, representation of genericity, the responsibility or cause of property that lies with a subject, implication of random and multiple agents, and the usage of manner verbs. In addition, this study examines whether the infinitive characteristics of the passive appears in a middle sentence. As a result, the argument was confirmed that a middle sentence and a corresponding active sentence cannot become synonymous sentences with mutual entailment while the sentences cannot be deemed to represent separate events. Additionally, an oblique that has a semantic role of an instrument is promoted to the subject of a middle sentence. However, because the oblique shares the same characteristics as the adjunct middle of the Dutch language, it could be accepted as the middle. Also, the fact that the middle is generally and cross-linguistically marked as a passive marker could be confirmed. Based on the results, this study concludes that the middle can be acknowledged in studies in Korean grammar.
참고문헌 (56)
- 기타무라 다다시, "한국어 피동 표현 연구" (2004), 제이앤씨
- 김미형, "조사 ‘이", 가’와 ‘은, 담화와 인지, pp.2011, 18(3)[DOI]
- 김미형, "조사 ‘은", 는’의 정체성- 문법서와 교재에서 어떻게 기술할 것인가 -, 2015, pp.(38), 5~45[DOI]
- 김영일, "한국어 피동사 피동문 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 김윤신, "국어 총칭 피동문의 유형과 의미", 언어학, (68), pp.197~217 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 김지은, "속격 명사구‘N1의 N2’의 불역과 관사 문제", 현대문법연구, (63), pp.241~276 (2011), 현대문법학회
- 김지혜, "한국어 비전형적 피동문의 의미 유형 연구", 박사, pp.2018
- 김지혜, "속성의 의미를 나타내는 피동문의 특성 연구", 반교어문연구, (52), pp.57~85 (2019), 반교어문학회
- 김현정, "양태부사 ‘잘’과 한국어 중간태 구문 - 일본어·터키어와의 비교를 중심으로", 언어, 44(3), pp.425~463 (2019), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 남수경, "한국어 피동문 연구" (2011), 월인
- 남수경, "‘-히-’계 접미사 구문의 한 유형에 대한 고찰 - 한국어 가능 피동의 특성을 중심으로 -", 한국어 의미학, 37, pp.77~102 (2012), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 목정수, "한국어 피동문의 구조와 가능(potential)의 의미 해석-대조적 관점에서-", 인문언어, 30(8), pp.369~387 (2006), 국제언어인문학회
- 박철우, "국어의 태 범주: 통사부와 의미부의 접면 현상", 한국어학, 37, pp.207~228 (2007), 한국어학회
- 배희임, "한국어 피동 연구" (1988), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원
- 백정화, "한국어 저절로 피동 구문의 반사동적 특징", 한국어 의미학, 54, pp.33~60 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 백정화, "언어 유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어 피동사 구문의 의미적 특징에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2018
- 백채원, "한국어 피동문의 역사적 연구", 박사, pp.2017
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 시라이시 치에미, "한국어 태와 이른바 피동 표현", 문창어문논집, 39, pp.28~68 (2002), 문창어문학회
- 시라이시 치에미, "피동표현과 가능 속성 구문", 우리말연구, (23), pp.113~138 (2008), 우리말학회
- 시라이시 치에미, "한·일 피동표현의 인지의미론적 대비 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2009
- 우인혜, "우리말 피동 연구" (1997), 한국문화사
- 이선웅, "한국어 문법론의 개념 연구" (2012), 월인
- 이정미, "영어 중간문의 총칭성", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.81~100 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- 이정민, "Abstract Syntax and Korean with Reference to English" (1994), 태학사
- 임홍빈, "국어 문법의 심층 3", pp.333~363 (1998)
- 정해권, "한국어 태 체계의 정립과 습득 및 교육 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 천호재, "한국어의 중간 자동사 구문과 중간 수동 구문에 관한 연구", 어학연구, 38(1), pp.211~240 (2002), 언어교육원
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1971), 정음문화사
- Ackema, P., "The middle construction and the syntax-semant ics interface", Lingua, 93, pp.59~90 (1994)
- Alexiadou, A., "Active, middle, and passive: The morpho-syntax of voice", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 13, pp.19~40 (2014)
- Alexiadou, A., "The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: passive and middle", Journal of Linguistics, 48(1), pp.1~34 (2012)
- Broekhuis, H., "Syntax of Dutch" (2015), Amsterdam University Press
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Changing valency Case studies in transitivity" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Fagan, S., "The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions: A Study with Special Reference to German" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Fellbaum, C., "On the middle constructions in English" (1986), Indiana University Linguist ics Club
- Haspelmath, M., "Grammaticalization of Passive Morphology", Studies in Language, 14(1), pp.25~72 (1990)
- Haspelmath, M., "Morphology: A Hand book on Inflection and Word Formation", pp.1130~1145 (2001), Mouton de Gruyter
- Hundt, M., "English Mediopassive Constructions A Cognitive, Corpus-Based Study of Their Origin, Spread and Current Status" (2007), Rodopi
- Iwata, S., "On the status of an implicit arguments in middles", Journal of Linguistics, 35(3), pp.527~553 (1999)
- Kemmer, S., "The Middle Voice" (1993), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Keyser, J., "On the middle and ergative constructions in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15(3), pp.381~416 (1984)
- Klaiman, M. H., "Grammatical Voice" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Krifka, M., "The Generic Book", pp.1~124 (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Malchukov, A., "Valency Class in the World's Languages vol. 1: A Comparative Handbook" (2015), Mouton de Gruyter
- Oosten, V., "The nature of subjects, topics and agents: a cognitive explanation" (1986), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Schäfer, F., "The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. External Arguments in Change-of-sta te Contexts" (2008), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Shibatani, M., "Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word For mation", pp.1145~1165 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
- Siewierska, A., "The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Anaylsis" (1984), Croom Helm
- Steinbach, M., "Middle Voice: A comparative study in the syntax-semantics interfa ce in German" (2002), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Stroik, T., "Demoting the Agent: Passive, middle and other voice phenomena", pp.301~326 (2006), John Ben jamins Publishing Company
- Toyota, J., "The grammatical voice in Japanese: a typological perspective" (2011), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
- Trask, R. L., "A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics" (1993), Routledge
- Yeon, J. H., "Korean Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning" (2003), Saffr on Books
- Yoshimura, K., "What makes a good middle? The role of qualia in the interpretation and acceptability of middle expression in English", English Language and Linguistics, 8, pp.293~321 (2004)
- 國分功一郎, "중동태의 세계" (2019), 동아시아
