본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

에밀 벵베니스트의 언어, 담화, 사회 연구

The relation between language, discourse and society in E. Benveniste

김현권
사단법인 한국언어학회 (The Linguistic Society of Korea)|2014.04|언어학 (EONEOHAG)|제68호|pp. 59-91|DOI 10.17290/jlsk.2014..68.59

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

culturesemanticsSaussurelanguediscoursesignificationsocietyreconstructionénonciationsemiologyBenvenisteIndo-european
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper aims to draw some essential theoretical elements from the works ofE. Benveniste, which reveal the subtle relation between language, discourseand society, and to illustrate their relation using some indo-european examples. Benveniste presents a very original concept of the énonciation that situates thediscourse between Saussure’s notion of langue and the society. His énonciation,which is somewhat different from the speech act, contains some referencesindicating the extra-linguistic reality by making use of the special linguisticsigns. Thus, the discourse has two different characteristics by nature, one thesemiological, the other the sociological. This theoretrical framework finallyleads to the semantic analysis of the institutional lexicon of the Indo-europeansociety, the triparite structure of which is discussed here as a case study.

Abstract

This paper aims to draw some essential theoretical elements from the works ofE. Benveniste, which reveal the subtle relation between language, discourseand society, and to illustrate their relation using some indo-european examples. Benveniste presents a very original concept of the énonciation that situates thediscourse between Saussure’s notion of langue and the society. His énonciation,which is somewhat different from the speech act, contains some referencesindicating the extra-linguistic reality by making use of the special linguisticsigns. Thus, the discourse has two different characteristics by nature, one thesemiological, the other the sociological. This theoretrical framework finallyleads to the semantic analysis of the institutional lexicon of the Indo-europeansociety, the triparite structure of which is discussed here as a case study.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. 김슬옹, "언어 분석 방법론으로서의 담론학 구성 시론", 사회언어학, 13(2), pp.43~68 (2005), 한국사회언어학회
  2. 김현권, "에밀 벵베니스트의 언어관-기호론과 의미론", 경북대 인문학총, 8, pp.133~147 (1983)
  3. 김현권, "신익성 교수 정년퇴임 기념논문집", pp.95~129 (1990)
  4. 김현권, "19세기와 20세기 프랑스 언어학의 지적 전통과 혁신", 언어학, (64), pp.3~30 (2012), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  5. 김현자, "뒤메질. 인도-유럽 신화와 3기능 이데올로기", 종교학연구, 19, pp.49~81 (2000)
  6. 김해연, "사회언어학에서의 담화연구", 사회언어학, 12(2), pp.105~130 (2004), 한국사회언어학회
  7. 박영순, "사회언어학 연구의 현황과 과제", 사회언어학, 12(1), pp.123~148 (2004), 한국사회언어학회
  8. 아야베 쓰네오, "문화인류학의 20가지 이론" (2006), 일조각
  9. 왕한석, "언어, 사회, 문화 - 언어인류학의 주요 조류", 사회언어학, 4(1), pp.3~50 (1996)
  10. 왕한석, "의사소통의 민족지학 연구: 한국 학계에의 소개와 앞으로의 연구 과제", 사회언어학, 18(2), pp.61~78 (2010), 한국사회언어학회
  11. Achard, P, "Discours et sociologie du langage", Langage et société, 37, pp.5~60 (1986), Sociologie et discours
  12. Bachmann, Ch, "Langue et communications sociales" (1981), Hatier-Crédif
  13. Balandier, G, "Tendances de l'ethnologie françaiseⅠ, II", Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 27, pp.11~26 (1959)
  14. Benveniste, E, "일반언어학의 여러 문제" (2013), 지만지
  15. Benveniste, E, "인도 유럽사회의 제도⋅문화 어휘 연구Ⅰ, Ⅱ" (1999), 아르케
  16. Blench, R, "Archaeology, Language and the African Past" (2006), AltaMira Press
  17. Bourdieu, P, "L'économie des échanges linguistiques", Langue française, 34, pp.17~34 (1977)
  18. Buck, C. D, "A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-european Languages" (1949), Univ. of Chicago Press
  19. Chiss, J, "Énonciation, interaction, conversation: les théories du langage entre le psychique et le social", HEL, 11, pp.27~36 (1989)
  20. Combettes, B, "Contribution pour une histoire récente de l'analyse du discours", Langue française, 121, pp.76~116 (1999)
  21. Dumézil, G, "《Tripertita》 fonctionnels chez divers peuples indo-européens", Revue de l'histoire des religions, 131(1-3), pp.53~72 (1946)
  22. Ehret, C, "The Archaeological and Linguistic Reconstruction of African History" (1982), Univ. of California Press
  23. Emerling, J, "20세기 현대예술이론" (2005), 미진사
  24. Fairclough N, "담화분석방법: 사회조사연구를 위한 텍스트분석" (2003), 경진
  25. Fenoglio, I, "Les notes de travail d'Emile Benveniste: où la pensée théorique naît via son énonciation", Langage et société, 127, pp.23~49 (2009)
  26. Franck, R, "Langue, discours et significations", Revue philosophique de Louvain, 67(94), pp.306~321 (1969)
  27. Gamkrelidze, T, "Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans" (1995), De Gruyter
  28. Geertz, C, "문화의 해석" (2009), 까치
  29. Gumperz, John J, "Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication" (1972), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  30. Hymes, D, "Foundations in Sociolinguistics, an Ethnographic Approach", pp.83~117 (1974), Univ. of Pennsylvania Press
  31. Hymes, D, "Foundations in Sociolinguistics: an Ethnographic Approach" (1974), Univ. of Pennsylvania Press
  32. Hymes, D, "Directions in (Ethno)linguistic theory", American Anthropologist, 66, pp.6~56 (2009)
  33. Hymes, D, "Language in Culture & Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology" (1966), Harper International Editions
  34. Jacqueline, L, "De l'ethonographie de la communication à la sociolinguistique interactionniste", L'Homme, 24(3-4), pp.131~135 (1984)
  35. Jakobson, R, "일반언어학이론" (1989), 민음사
  36. Jourdan, C, "Presentation. L’ethnolinguistique aujourd’hui. Etat des lieux", Anthropologie et sociétés, 23(3), pp.5~13 (1999)
  37. Kress, G, "Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader", pp.29~38 (2001), SAGE
  38. Lamberterie, C, "A propos du vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes", Emile Benveniste. Vingt ans après, 9, pp.355~363 (1997), Linx
  39. Lyle, E, "Which triad? A critique and development of Dumézil's tripartite structure", Revue de l'histoire des religions, 221(1), pp.5~21 (2004)
  40. Maingueneau, D, "L’analyse du discours" (1991), Hachette
  41. Maingueneau, D, "Le tour ethnolinguistique de l'analyse du discours", Langages, 26, pp.114~125 (1992)
  42. Mallory, J. P, "In Search of Indo-europeans. Langauage, Archaeology and Myth" (1989), Thames & Hudson Ltd
  43. 류정아, "증여론" (2011), 지식을만드는지식
  44. Meillet, A, "Linguistique historique et linguistique générale I", pp.230~271 (1921), H. Champion
  45. Meillet, A, "일반언어학과 역사언어학" (1997), 어문학사
  46. Monod-Becquelin, A, "Meillet, Benveniste et l'etholinguistique in Antoine Meillet et la linguistique de son temps", HEL, 10(2), pp.141~153 (1998)
  47. Normand, C, "Les termes de l'énonciation de Benveniste", HEL, 8(2), pp.191~206 (1986)
  48. Normand, C, "Emile Benveniste: quelle sémantique", Linx, 8(22), pp.1~40 (1996)
  49. Normand, C, "Lectures de Benveniste: quelques variantes sur un itinéraire balisé in Émile Benveniste. Vingt ans après", Linx, 9, pp.25~37 (1997)
  50. Normand, C, "Sémiologie, sémiotique, sémantique : remarques sur l’emploi de ces termes par Émile Benveniste", Linx, 44, pp.29~38 (2001)
  51. Paulston, C. B, "The Early Days of Sociolinguistics" (1997), The Summer Institute of Linguistics
  52. Pierre, K, "Le linguiste et le discours", Langages, 45, pp.112~126 (1977)
  53. Pokorny, J, "Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch" (1959), Francke
  54. Polomé, E. C, "Research Guide on Language Change", pp.137~159 (1990), de Gruyter
  55. Polomé, E. C, "Reconstructing Languages and Cultures" (1992), de Gruyter
  56. Puech, C, "L'émergence de la notion de “discours” en France et les destins du saussurisme", Langages, 39, pp.93~110 (2005)
  57. Quéré, L, "Sociologie et sémantique: le langage dans l'organisation sociale de l'expérience", Sociétés contemporaines, (18-19), pp.17~41 (1994)
  58. Rastier, F, "Sémiotique et sciences de la culture,Spécificité et histoire des discours sémiotiques", Linx, 44, pp.149~168 (2001)
  59. Renfrew, C, "Archaeology and Language: the Puzzle of Indo-European Origins" (1987), Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Renfrew, C, "At the Edge of Knowability: Towards a Prehistory of Languages", Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 10(1), pp.7~34 (2000)
  61. Ruwet, N, "Langue, discours, société. Pour E. Benveniste" (1975), Seuil
  62. 김현권, "일반언어학강의" (2012), 지만지
  63. 왕한석, "언어와 사회: 의사소통의 민족지학 입문" (2009), 한국문화사
  64. Serbat, G, "E. Benveniste aujourd'hui. Actes du Colloque du CNRS", Actes du Colloque du CNRS (1983)
  65. Sommerfelt, A, "Problèmes du Langage", pp.191~196 (1966), Gallimard
  66. Schiffrin, D, "The Handbook of Discourse Analysis" (2003), Blackwell Publishing
  67. De Vogüé, S, "La croisée des chemins. Remarques sur la topologie des relations langue", discours chez Benveniste in Benveniste. Vingt ans après, 1997, pp.9, 145~158

관련 논문AI추천

에밀 벵베니스트의 언어, 담화, 사회 관계 연구김현권한국불어불문학회 · 불어불문학연구2014 · 제98호에밀 벤브니스트와 기호학김휘택프랑스학회 · 프랑스학연구2023 · 제103호담화 기원(instance du discours)의 불확실성에 대한 연구 : 에밀 벤브니스트Émile Benveniste와 롤랑 바르트Roland Barthes의 이론을 중심으로김휘택프랑스학회 · 프랑스학연구2025 · 제108호19세기와 20세기 프랑스 언어학의 지적 전통과 혁신김현권사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2012 · 제64호언어를 들여다보는 렌즈로서의 담화김종현사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2020 · 제88호사회규범과 언어사용 - 프랑스어의 예절 표현 사례 연구윤성노한국불어불문학회 · 불어불문학연구2010 · 제83호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

텍스트 맥락과 단어 의미: 잠재의미분석강범모pp. 3-34한국어 분열문의 통사구조와 생략이론박소영pp. 35-57주격조사 ‘-가’의 발달고광모pp. 93-118Comprehension and Production of Psych Verbs in Korean정현경pp. 119-148헝가리 어 후치사의 통사범주박수영pp. 149-174
원문 보기