경영권 방어와 비례의 원칙 -대판 2009.1.30. 2008다50776 판결의 평석을 겸하여-
The Principle of Proportionality and The Defense against a Hostile Take-Over Action
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The principle of proportionality, or simply 'the proportionality test', originates itself from public law in Korea. The principle has especially established its strong root in the field of balancing the interest of entire community - the state or public self-governing entity - with that of individual citizens. Concretely speaking, the principle of proportionality essentially consists of the following four elements. The first element is the legitimacy of the end. This requires that aimed for the end in engaging of particular state action by the state must be legitimated. The second is the appropriateness of the means. It signifies the suitability of the tools chosen by the state for realizing the end. The third is the minimal of the infringement. It is the requirement of the least restrictive means. The final element is the proportionality of legal interests, which represents that there must be proportionally great public interest created by the subject state action for it to restrict on a person's basic rights without violating the constitution. Nowadays in Korea, it seems like to be normal or prevalent that this principle would partly be introduced to the private law, particularly to the corporate law. In addition, Melvin Eisenberg expressed simply, “the corporate law is constitutional law.” Through this passage, he tried to emphasize the common phenomenon - conflict of interest between the entire entity and its individual members - observed between the both law sectors. In the hostile take-over action, the targeted boardroom would defend the status quo only in the frame of this principle.
Abstract
The principle of proportionality, or simply 'the proportionality test', originates itself from public law in Korea. The principle has especially established its strong root in the field of balancing the interest of entire community - the state or public self-governing entity - with that of individual citizens. Concretely speaking, the principle of proportionality essentially consists of the following four elements. The first element is the legitimacy of the end. This requires that aimed for the end in engaging of particular state action by the state must be legitimated. The second is the appropriateness of the means. It signifies the suitability of the tools chosen by the state for realizing the end. The third is the minimal of the infringement. It is the requirement of the least restrictive means. The final element is the proportionality of legal interests, which represents that there must be proportionally great public interest created by the subject state action for it to restrict on a person's basic rights without violating the constitution. Nowadays in Korea, it seems like to be normal or prevalent that this principle would partly be introduced to the private law, particularly to the corporate law. In addition, Melvin Eisenberg expressed simply, “the corporate law is constitutional law.” Through this passage, he tried to emphasize the common phenomenon - conflict of interest between the entire entity and its individual members - observed between the both law sectors. In the hostile take-over action, the targeted boardroom would defend the status quo only in the frame of this principle.
참고문헌 (14)
- 권종호, "적대적 M&A 에 대한 방어수단의 국제비교와 시사점", 기업법연구, 20(1)통권 : 24, pp.95~122 (2006), 한국기업법학회
- 김규진, "포이즌필 경영권방어수단" (2007), 첨단금융출판사
- 김남진, "행정법 I 제5판" (1995), 법문사
- 김원준, "일본의 M&A 방어수단에 관한 연구 신주예약권을 이용한 방어수단을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
- 김이수, "現行 商法에 비추어 본 株主의 新株引受權 制度의 當爲性에 관한 考察", 상사판례연구, 23(4), pp.3~41 (2010), 한국상사판례학회
- 류지태, "행정법신론" (1995), 신영사
- 신은영, "경영권 방어목적의 제3자 배정 신주발행", 판례연구, 23(1) (2009), 서울지방변호사회간
- 유영일, "적대적 공개매수에 대한 일본 방어법제의 최근 동향 - 2007년 불독소스 결정을 중심으로 -", 상사판례연구, 21(3), pp.57~89 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
- 유영일, "방어행위의 적법성 판단에 관한 국내 판례의 법리- 현대엘리베이터 결정의 재평가 -", 기업법연구, 23(1)통권 : 36, pp.249~274 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 장영수, "헌법총론(헌법학 I)" (2002), 홍문사
- 정기봉, "비례의 원칙의 私法상 적용 -주식회사 경영권 방어의 적법성 판단-", 법학연구, 20(3), pp.239~293 (2010), 법학연구원
- Drews, "Martens, In Gefahrenabwehr Allgemeines Polizeirecht (Ordnungs recht) des Bundes und der Laender" (1986), Carl Heymanns Verlag
- Eisenberg, "The Structure of the Corporation,In A Legal Analysis" (1976), Brown & Co
- Yi, Zoonil, "Das Gebot der Verhältnismäßigkeit in der grundrechtlichen Argumentation", pp.1998
