기업매수방어책과 주주평등의 원칙
Principle of equality of shareholders and corporate takeover defenses
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The principle of equality of shareholders is central principle of company law. By the way, the country which stipulates expressly in law actively is, but the nation of the negative attitude is. Therefore, I think this is not the universal principle which is common in company laws, but the principle which appears from the earnest request of legal actuality. Of course, it will not be able to deny the logic which they establish in ideology of justice and balance that theory and judical precedent support. Only, the universal principle which is a high position norm because is the last bulwark for right protection and a law order maintenance, there is a necessity which will control one application which is possible. To the case to which consequently, the shareholder equal principle needs, respects a clarity and a legal stability from, after stipulating expressly in laws, about the actual condition law violation discussion to lead and, is more desirable to solve. Meantime, there is critical opinion that a view oneself that takeover defenses is not violation of the principle of equality of shareholders, is justifying for poison pills. But, when applying this principle to, the interpretation which is soft and elastic is necessary. Namely, For the whole society from certainly the company which is necessary to exist, there is not a necessity which will apply the equal principle which is uniform about hostile takeover which is the possibility which will injure the company value of the company which is such. In order defending the company value of the company which is necessary in order for the whole society from certainly from, unavoidably to the case where the situation which is special must sacrifice a shareholder equal principle is recognized, there is not a necessity which will accomplish a shareholder equal principle. To the case where like this, the rationality of handling which is unequal is recognized handling which is unequal exceptionally is permitted. And, there is to rationality judgment for handling which is unequal, different element and joins in and a necessity which will consider attributes of the attacker also there is.
Abstract
The principle of equality of shareholders is central principle of company law. By the way, the country which stipulates expressly in law actively is, but the nation of the negative attitude is. Therefore, I think this is not the universal principle which is common in company laws, but the principle which appears from the earnest request of legal actuality. Of course, it will not be able to deny the logic which they establish in ideology of justice and balance that theory and judical precedent support. Only, the universal principle which is a high position norm because is the last bulwark for right protection and a law order maintenance, there is a necessity which will control one application which is possible. To the case to which consequently, the shareholder equal principle needs, respects a clarity and a legal stability from, after stipulating expressly in laws, about the actual condition law violation discussion to lead and, is more desirable to solve. Meantime, there is critical opinion that a view oneself that takeover defenses is not violation of the principle of equality of shareholders, is justifying for poison pills. But, when applying this principle to, the interpretation which is soft and elastic is necessary. Namely, For the whole society from certainly the company which is necessary to exist, there is not a necessity which will apply the equal principle which is uniform about hostile takeover which is the possibility which will injure the company value of the company which is such. In order defending the company value of the company which is necessary in order for the whole society from certainly from, unavoidably to the case where the situation which is special must sacrifice a shareholder equal principle is recognized, there is not a necessity which will accomplish a shareholder equal principle. To the case where like this, the rationality of handling which is unequal is recognized handling which is unequal exceptionally is permitted. And, there is to rationality judgment for handling which is unequal, different element and joins in and a necessity which will consider attributes of the attacker also there is.
참고문헌 (49)
- 권재열, "한국형 포이즌 필의 도입에 관한 연구 -2009년 12월 법무부가 입법예고한 상법 일부개정법률안에 대한 검토-", 경영법률, 20(2), pp.381~416 (2010), 한국경영법률학회
- 김재범, "주주평등의 원칙을 개관함", 안암법학, 4 (1996)
- 김태진, "주주평등원칙에 관한 소고", 기업법연구, 22(3), pp.9~52 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 이기수, "기업법 개정판" (2004), 세창출판사
- 이기수, "상법학(상) 제3판" (1999), 박영사
- 이동승, "주주의 신주인수권에 관한 연구 그 배재요건을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1998
- 이영철, "포이즌필과 주주평등의 원칙", 기업법연구, 23(3)통권 : 38, pp.191~224 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 이철송, "상법강의 제9판" (2008), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의 제10판" (2003), 박영사
- 장근영, "주주의 출자손실에 대한 회사의 보전약정의 효력", 법학논총, 26(4), pp.239~264 (2009), 법학연구소
- 정경영, "상법학 강의" (2007), 박영사
- 정동윤, "회사법 제7판" (2001), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상) 제14판" (2011), 박영사
- 강영기, "大買收時代における資本市場法制のあり方", 박사, pp.2010
- 森田, "上場會社法入門" (2008), 有斐閣
- 上村達男, "株主平等原則(竹內昭夫 編, 特別講義商法Ⅰ)" (1995), 有斐閣
- 森本滋, "會社法における株主平等原則", 商事法務, (1825) (2008)
- 落合誠一, "株主平等の原則(會社法演習)" (1983), 有斐閣
- 大隅健一郞=今井宏, "會社法論 上卷(제3판)" (1991), 有斐閣
- 森本滋, "株主平等原則と株式社員權論", 商事法務, (1401) (1995)
- 上村達男, "株主平等原則", 法學敎室, 133 (1991)
- 神田秀樹, "會社法(제11판)" (2009), 弘文堂
- 南保勝美, "新會社法における株主平等原則の意義と機能", 法律論叢, 79(2) (2007)
- 北村雅史, "株主平等原則(浜田道代=岩原紳作 編,In 會社法の爭点" (2009), 有斐閣
- 森本滋, "會社法のもとにおける株主平等原則の機能について", 學術創成硏究通信(京都大學), (2) (2008)
- 高橋英治, "わが國會社法學の課題としての株主平等原則", 商事法務, (1860) (2009)
- 江頭憲治郞ほか, "會社法制定までの經緯と新會社法の讀み方", 商事法務, (1739) (2005)
- 出 正義, "株主平等の原則(株主權法理の展開)" (1991), 文眞堂
- 村田敏一, "會社法における株主平等原則(109條1項)の意義と解釋", 立命館法學, (316) (2007)
- 相澤哲, "一問一答 新會社法" (2005), 商事法務
- 岩原紳, "新會社法の意義と問題点", 商事法務, (1775) (2006)
- 松尾健一, "種類株式と株主平等原則に關する考察", 同志社法學, 60(7) (2009)
- 鈴木竹雄, "會社法(全訂第5版)" (1998), 弘文堂
- 이철송, "會社法講義 (制18版)" (2010), 박영사
- 弥永眞生, "リーガルマインド會社法" (1997), 有斐閣
- 上村達男, "會社法改革 公開株式會社法の構想" (2002), 岩波書店
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2006), 有斐閣
- 葉玉匡美, "議決權制限株式を利用した買收防衛策", 商事法務, (1742) (2005)
- 北澤正啓, "會社法(第6版)" (2001), 靑林書院
- 前田庸, "會社法(第11版 補訂版)" (2008), 有斐閣
- 若林泰伸, "改正史から讀み解く會社法の問題点", ビジネス法務, 7(4) (2007)
- 高岡義幸, "種類株式から見た株式會社の設計思想", 廣島經濟大學經濟硏究論集, 32(1) (2009)
- 吉本健一, "ポイズン・ピルと株主平等原則", 阪大法學, 55(3) (2005)
- 企業價値硏究會, "企業價値報告書" (2005)
- 經濟産業省, "企業價値・株主共同の利益の確保又は向上のための買收防衛策に關する指針", ~ (2005)
- 末永敏和, "株主平等の原則" (2006), 中央經濟社
- 田中, "ブルドックソース事件の法的檢討(下)", 商事法務, (1810) (2007)
- 森本滋, "會社法への實務對應に伴う問題点の檢討", 商事法務, (1807) (2007)
- 上村達男, "株式會社はどこへ行くのか" (2007), 日本經濟新聞出版社
