5E 과학학습과정 상의 기능을 중심으로 한 2009 개정 초등과학교과서 삽화 분석: 3~4학년 지구과학 단원을 대상으로
An Analysis of Illustrations in the 2009 Revised Elementary School Science Textbooks: Focus on Functions of Illustrations and Roles on 5E Inquiry Learning Process
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the role of illustrations in elementary textbooks (3~4 grade) of the 2009 revised curriculum of science education in Korea from point of view of aim of science by applying the criteria of 5E inquiry process model for reflecting core aim of the science education. The subjects of the paper was the 105 illustrations in the earth-science domain of elementary science textbooks (3~4 grade) of the 2009 revised curriculum of science education in Korea. The analysis criterion was of two categories, the function of illustration and the role of illustration. the function of illustration was divided into three subcategories such as Exclusiveness type, correspondence type and supplementary type. The role of illustration was divide into five subcategories such as Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration and Evaluation. According to results of the illustration analysis are as follows: the result of the function of illustration are exclusiveness type 39, correspondence type 36 and supplementary type 30, the important of point to note is that there are a lot of exclusiveness type considerably. compared with other subjects, this fact indicate character of illustration of the only science textbook. The result of the role of illustration are Engagement 14, exploration 64, explanation 25, elaboration 2 and evaluation 0. This data indicate main role of illustrations in earth-science domain is to help the students to be able to observe and explore. Cross-analysis of the function and role was a significant difference. Role of illustration was evenly distributed within Exclusiveness type on the other hand, the role of illustrations was mainly exploration and explanation in correspondence and supplementary type. Especially, illustration of exploration was mainly correspondence type.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the role of illustrations in elementary textbooks (3~4 grade) of the 2009 revised curriculum of science education in Korea from point of view of aim of science by applying the criteria of 5E inquiry process model for reflecting core aim of the science education. The subjects of the paper was the 105 illustrations in the earth-science domain of elementary science textbooks (3~4 grade) of the 2009 revised curriculum of science education in Korea. The analysis criterion was of two categories, the function of illustration and the role of illustration. the function of illustration was divided into three subcategories such as Exclusiveness type, correspondence type and supplementary type. The role of illustration was divide into five subcategories such as Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration and Evaluation. According to results of the illustration analysis are as follows: the result of the function of illustration are exclusiveness type 39, correspondence type 36 and supplementary type 30, the important of point to note is that there are a lot of exclusiveness type considerably. compared with other subjects, this fact indicate character of illustration of the only science textbook. The result of the role of illustration are Engagement 14, exploration 64, explanation 25, elaboration 2 and evaluation 0. This data indicate main role of illustrations in earth-science domain is to help the students to be able to observe and explore. Cross-analysis of the function and role was a significant difference. Role of illustration was evenly distributed within Exclusiveness type on the other hand, the role of illustrations was mainly exploration and explanation in correspondence and supplementary type. Especially, illustration of exploration was mainly correspondence type.
참고문헌 (27)
- 백남권, "제 6차와 제 7차 초등학교 3, 4학년 과학 교과서의 내용과 삽화의 비교？분석", 초등과학교육, 21(1), pp.61~70 (2002), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 방희건, "초등학교 과학 교과서 생명 영역에 제시된 시각 자료의 분석", 생물교육, 40(3), pp.279~289 (2012), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Biological Sciences Curriculum Science (BSCS), "New designs for elementary school science and health:A cooperative project of Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) and International Business Machines (IBM)", pp.1989, Kendall
- Carney, R. N, "Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text", Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), pp.5~26 (2002)
- 최윤미, "2007년 개정교육과정에 따른 초등 과학교과서에 제시된 발문의 유형 분석", 과학교육연구지, 36(1), pp.120~129 (2012), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- Choi, Y. R, "The illustration analysis of the elementary science textbooks.", Journal of the Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 12(2), pp.109~128 (1998)
- 동효관, "5E 순환학습이 초등학생의 과학 학업 성취도와 탐구 능력 및과학적 태도에 미치는 효과", 초등과학교육, 29(4), pp.567~575 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Duchastel, P. C, "Research on illustrations in text:Issues and perspectives", Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 28(4), pp.283~287 (1980)
- 하지훈, "초등학생의 VARK 학습양식과 과학적 의사소통 능력의 관계", 초등과학교육, 33(4), pp.724~735 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- Kesidou, S, "How well do middle school science programs measure up? findings from project 2061’s Curriculum Review", Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 39(6), pp.522~549 (2002)
- Koh, H. J, "The comparative analysis of the illustration in the 6th and 7th national curriculum 6th and 7th grade primary science textbooks", Journal of Research in Science Education, 25, pp.21~46 (2003)
- 이창훈, "우리나라와 싱가포르의 초등학교과학교과서 삽화 비교 분석", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 6(1), pp.13~19 (2013), 대한지구과학교육학회
- 이기영, "6차와 7차 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 지구과학 교과서에 사용된 사진과 삽화의 기능 및 구조 비교 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 28(7), pp.811~824 (2007), 한국지구과학회
- 이승왕, "초등 국어과 보조 교과서의 특징과 방향 모색", 우리말연구, (37), pp.167~193 (2014), 우리말학회
- Levie, W. H, "Effects of text illustrations:A review of research", Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30(4), pp.195~232 (1982)
- On functions of pictures in prose, "Levin, J. R", Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling, ~, pp.Theoretical Paper, 80 (1979)
- Levin, J. R, "The psychology of illustration: I. Basic research" (1987), Springer
- Ministry of Education, "Elementary school 3th grade first semester science textbook" (2014), Mirae-N
- Ministry of Education, "Elementary school 4th grade first semester science textbook" (2014), Mirae-N
- Ministry of Education, "Elementary school 4th grade science teacher’s guide" (2014), Mirae-N
- 박현주, "화학 I 교과서의 학습 목표 및 평가 문항 분석", 대한화학회지, 56(4), pp.491~499 (2012), 대한화학회[DOI]
- Park, S. H, "The comparison on illustrations of elementary science textbooks in Korea and Japan", Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 14(1), pp.58~69 (1994)
- Pozzer, L. L, "Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), pp.1089~1114 (2003)
- 신형욱, "교과서의 텍스트언어학적 고찰 - 텍스트언어학의 과제와 한계 -", 텍스트언어학, 30, pp.135~160 (2011), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 신명환, "초ㆍ중등 과학 교과서 화산과 지진 관련 단원 글의 언어 구조 비교 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 31(1), pp.36~50 (2010), 한국지구과학회
- Woo, J. O, "The analysis of development system and evaluation of elementary science textbooks", Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 32(2), pp.306~319 (1992)
- 여상인, "한국과 미국 BSCS 초등 과학 교과서의 삽화 비교", 초등과학교육, 26(4), pp.459~467 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회