‘-도’의 문법범주에 관한 연구: ‘Vstem-도 못하다/않다/말다’를 중심으로
A Study on Grammar Category of ‘-do(도)’s in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to categorize the grammar radius of ‘-do(도)’. ‘-do(도)’ is a functional word, and there are three types. ‘-do(도)1’ is related to the negative connective ending of ‘-ji(지)’, which is normally considered as an ending or a particle auxiliary. ‘do(도)2’ is used as a connective ending to a conjunctive sentence. ‘do(도)3’ is used as a supportive connective ending in relation to auxiliary predicates like ‘become(되다), like(좋다), fine(괜찮다), have nothing to do with(상관없다) etc’. Amongst these three, this thesis paper argues that ‘-do(도)1’, which is a negative connective ending related to ‘-ji(지)’, should be categorized as a semantic particle(the original auxiliary particle). This study provides the proof that authenticate the argument. Firstly, when looking at ‘do(도)’ as a unified category, differentiation from word endings becomes ambiguous. Secondly, the singular negative changing process of ‘-do(도)1’ is different from that of ‘-do(도)2’ and ‘-do(도)3’. Thirdly, ‘-do(도)1’ has restrictions when connecting with the honorific prefinal ending ‘-(eu(으))shi(시)-’, and cannot be handled as an ending. Also, this study revealed that, ‘-ji(지)’ can be deleted in phonetic terms due to the fact that the ending‘-ji(지)’ and the semantic particle ‘-do(도)’ shows a high probability of meaning overlapping
Abstract
This paper aims to categorize the grammar radius of ‘-do(도)’. ‘-do(도)’ is a functional word, and there are three types. ‘-do(도)1’ is related to the negative connective ending of ‘-ji(지)’, which is normally considered as an ending or a particle auxiliary. ‘do(도)2’ is used as a connective ending to a conjunctive sentence. ‘do(도)3’ is used as a supportive connective ending in relation to auxiliary predicates like ‘become(되다), like(좋다), fine(괜찮다), have nothing to do with(상관없다) etc’. Amongst these three, this thesis paper argues that ‘-do(도)1’, which is a negative connective ending related to ‘-ji(지)’, should be categorized as a semantic particle(the original auxiliary particle). This study provides the proof that authenticate the argument. Firstly, when looking at ‘do(도)’ as a unified category, differentiation from word endings becomes ambiguous. Secondly, the singular negative changing process of ‘-do(도)1’ is different from that of ‘-do(도)2’ and ‘-do(도)3’. Thirdly, ‘-do(도)1’ has restrictions when connecting with the honorific prefinal ending ‘-(eu(으))shi(시)-’, and cannot be handled as an ending. Also, this study revealed that, ‘-ji(지)’ can be deleted in phonetic terms due to the fact that the ending‘-ji(지)’ and the semantic particle ‘-do(도)’ shows a high probability of meaning overlapping
참고문헌 (27)
- 고영근, "한국의 언어연구" (2001), 역락
- 고영근, "표준국어문법론" (2001), 탑출판사
- 김덕호, "경북방언의 지리언어학" (2001), 월인
- 김승곤, "국어 토씨 어원과 용법" (2004), 역락
- 김영태, "현대국어 보조용언 연구" (1997), 문창사
- 박용찬, "중세국어 연결어미와 보조사의 통합형(국어학 총서 62)" (2008), 태학사
- 박정규, "국어 부정문의 체계적 연구" (2003), 보고사
- 박형우, "국어 부정문의 변천 연구" (2004), 한국문화사
- 서태룡, "조사 ‘-아’와 어미 ‘-아’", 한국어문학연구, 41, pp.5~35 (2003)
- 서태룡, "국어의 어미 ‘-도’", 國語學, (45), pp.93~118 (2005), 국어학회
- 서태룡, "국어 조사와 어미의 관련성", 國語學, (47), pp.65~89 (2006), 국어학회
- 송창선, "부정문에 나타나는 ‘-지’의 통사특성", 문학과 언어, 12, pp.81~102 (1991)
- 엄정호, "장형 부정문에 나타나는 ‘-지’에 대하여", 국어학, 16, pp.645~660 (1987)
- 이상규, "방언의 미학" (2007), 살림
- 이은경, "국어의 연결 어미 연구" (2000), 태학사
- 이지영, "한국어 용언부정문의 역사적 변화" (2008), 태학사
- 이현희, "‘- ’와 ‘-沙’", 한일어학논총, pp.523~585 (1995)
- 임동훈, "한국어 조사의 하위 부류와 결합 유형", 國語學, (43), pp.119~154 (2004), 국어학회
- 제갈덕주, "다의성과 다면성의 변별성 연구", 언어과학연구, (69), pp.315~338 (2014), 언어과학회
- 조이수, "5-6세 한국 아동의 보조사 ‘도’와 ‘만’의 이해 능력", 언어과학, 20(1), pp.185~203 (2013), 한국언어과학회
- 최동주, "현대국어의 특수조사에 대한 통사적 고찰", 국어학, 30, pp.201~224 (1997)
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 연세대학교출판문화원
- 허웅, "우리옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
- 허재영, "부정문의 통시적 연구" (2002), 역락
- 홍사만, "국어특수조사신연구" (2002), 역락
- 황종배, "외국인 학습자의 한국어 선어말어미 -시-, -았", 었-, -겠-의 중첩 습득 연구, 2008, pp.15(2), 183~199[DOI]