현대 국어 조사ㆍ어미의 분류 재고
Classification of ParticlesㆍEndings in Modern Korean Revisited
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study seeks to find rational measures for dealing with particles and endings in terms of theoretical descriptions of grammar and practical applications. Particles and endings are categorized different. This makes it impossible to establish a generic concept which embraces particles and endings. This study categorizes them according to their functions. It discusses that they are qualified as words that are an integrated categorization. This study also suggests the exclusive distributions of words and syntactic words in that they include units with substantive and formal meanings and that syntactic words are combined units of substantive and formal meanings. It is the function of elements that is essential to understanding the structure of sentences. In order to eliminate these drawbacks of the categorization, this study attempts classification of the functions which play important roles in describing and educating structures of sentences. This classification also grasps the same functions of particles and endings.
Abstract
This study seeks to find rational measures for dealing with particles and endings in terms of theoretical descriptions of grammar and practical applications. Particles and endings are categorized different. This makes it impossible to establish a generic concept which embraces particles and endings. This study categorizes them according to their functions. It discusses that they are qualified as words that are an integrated categorization. This study also suggests the exclusive distributions of words and syntactic words in that they include units with substantive and formal meanings and that syntactic words are combined units of substantive and formal meanings. It is the function of elements that is essential to understanding the structure of sentences. In order to eliminate these drawbacks of the categorization, this study attempts classification of the functions which play important roles in describing and educating structures of sentences. This classification also grasps the same functions of particles and endings.
참고문헌 (18)
- "역대한국문법대계"
- 김민수, "신국어학사(전정판)" (1980), 일조각
- 김민수, "국어문법론(중판)" (1982), 일조각
- 김민수, "신국어학(전정중판)" (1995), 일조각
- 김민수, "역대한국문법대계" (1986), 탑출판사
- 김민수, "역대한국문법대계(Ⅱ)" (2009), 박이정
- 북한, "조선문화어문법" (1979), 과학·백과사전출판사
- 서울 대학교 국어 교육 연구소, "고등 학교 문법" (2002), 두산
- 서정수, "분석 체계와 종합적 설명법의 재검토 : 국어 문법은 분석 체계로기술되어야 한다", 주시경학보, 4 (1989), 주시경연구소
- 서정수, "국어문법(수정증보판)" (1996), 한양대학교출판원
- 이광정, "국어품사분류의 역사적 발전에 관한 연구" (1987), 한신문화사
- 崔鎬哲, "현대 국어 敍述語의 의미 연구 : 義素 設定을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문, pp.1993
- 최호철, "현대 국어 가의소의 의미 분석(1) : ‘-답다, -되다, -롭다, -스럽다’를중심으로", 한국어학, 1 (1994), 한국어학회
- 최호철, "국어의 보어에 대하여", 한국어학, 2 (1995), 한국어학회
- 최호철, "국어의 문법 단위와 문법 교육", 어문논집(고려대), 34 (1995), 민족어문학회
- 최호철, "국어의 ‘토’ 문법에 관한 남북한 연구 대비", 민족문화연구, 33 (2000), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원
- 최호철, "한국어 토(조사", 어미) 분류 방식의 사적 고찰: 역대한국문법대계를 대상으로, 2014, ~[DOI]
- 최호철, "현대 국어 조사", 어미의 기능적 분류에 대하여, 2014, ~