수세적 협력에서 균형적 협력으로 : 미국 통상공세에 대한 중국의 대응 변화
From Offensive Cooperations to Balanced Cooperations : Changing China’s Responses to America’s Trade Offensives
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
China’s trade policies toward the United States has transformed from initially defensive cooperation at the time of its entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 to a more balanced cooperation. Also, in terms of purpose, Chinese polices are moving toward cooperation and expansion of mutually managing areas. There are four main parts to trade policies: trade regulation, exchange rate, economic cooperation, and trade norms. As show in the table below, China’s trade policy toward the United States changes depending on the agenda. With trade regulation, China has clearly demonstrated a will to respond strongly within the boundary of international norms. At the same time, while responding forcefully, China has cautiously and gradually accepted U.S. demands in areas under its control such as with the exchange rate. In contrast, China is actively accepting global trade norms and respecting multilateral and regional organizations. Also, in areas of economic cooperation where win-win effect is guaranteed, China demonstrates active cooperative. China is moving away from a passive response to a more active response while also pursuing balanced cooperation. In this way, China has been aggressive when necessary yet cooperative in more feasible areas. <TABLE> Comparison of China’s trade policy towards the U.S. before and after the financial crisis What will the future be like? It depends upon the sustainability of external and internal elements in which a cooperative balance strategy is possible. China will maintain its current policy if its economic growth can be maintained under the existing trade order. In contrast, if the United States changes its policy of trade norms or China faces less room for economic growth under the WTO regime, Beijing will seek an alternative. Such a scenario though will remain unlikely so long as the United States needs cooperation from China and that under the free trade regime, China’s economic growth will be unaffected.
Abstract
China’s trade policies toward the United States has transformed from initially defensive cooperation at the time of its entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 to a more balanced cooperation. Also, in terms of purpose, Chinese polices are moving toward cooperation and expansion of mutually managing areas. There are four main parts to trade policies: trade regulation, exchange rate, economic cooperation, and trade norms. As show in the table below, China’s trade policy toward the United States changes depending on the agenda. With trade regulation, China has clearly demonstrated a will to respond strongly within the boundary of international norms. At the same time, while responding forcefully, China has cautiously and gradually accepted U.S. demands in areas under its control such as with the exchange rate. In contrast, China is actively accepting global trade norms and respecting multilateral and regional organizations. Also, in areas of economic cooperation where win-win effect is guaranteed, China demonstrates active cooperative. China is moving away from a passive response to a more active response while also pursuing balanced cooperation. In this way, China has been aggressive when necessary yet cooperative in more feasible areas. <TABLE> Comparison of China’s trade policy towards the U.S. before and after the financial crisis What will the future be like? It depends upon the sustainability of external and internal elements in which a cooperative balance strategy is possible. China will maintain its current policy if its economic growth can be maintained under the existing trade order. In contrast, if the United States changes its policy of trade norms or China faces less room for economic growth under the WTO regime, Beijing will seek an alternative. Such a scenario though will remain unlikely so long as the United States needs cooperation from China and that under the free trade regime, China’s economic growth will be unaffected.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김기수, "미중 경제, 구조적 상호의존 관계", 친디아저널 (2009), POSRI
- 김기수, "미중 경제관계의 전략 理解 : 상호의존과 경쟁", 세종정책연구, 3(2) (2007), 세종연구소
- 중국의 부상과 미중 통상분쟁, "박번순", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2012)
- 중국의 보조금 현황과 주요국의 대응사례 연구, "박월라", 대외경제정책연구원, ~ (2011)
- 중국 10대 산업 진흥조치의 주요 내용과 시사점, "양평섭", 대외경제정책연구원, ~, pp.KIEP지역경제포커스(대외경제정책연구원 09-05호) (2009)
- 이동률, "미중관계 구도에 새로운 변화 오나 : 중국의 정책의지가 미중 관계에 미치는 영향 커질 듯", 친디아저널 (2009)
- 글로벌 경제위기에 대한 중국의 대응과 미중경제관계, "이장규", KIEP, ~, pp.KIEP 연구보고서 10-11 (2010)
- 조노석, "주요 분야별 미국의 정책변화와 우리 기업의 대응 : 무역구제", 미국 신정부의 통상정책 방향과 우리 기업의 대응(국제무역연구원 주최 컨퍼런스 2009년 1월 22일) 발표문 (2009)
- 중국의 대북미 외교안보정책과 통상전략, "주재우", KIEP, ~, pp.KIEP 중장기통상전략연구 07-09-02 (2007)
- 정환우, "중-미 통상관계 악화와 우리 기업의 생존법", International Trade (2009)
- 미중 경제전략대화 : 중국 위협론에서 중국책임론으로, "지만수", 대외경제정책연구원, ~, pp.제07-06호 (2007)
- 주요 선진국의 대중국 경제협력 현황과 통상전략, "최의현", KIEP, ~, pp.KIEP 중장기통상전략연구 07-02-01 (2007)
- 선진국-중국 무역마찰, 그 영향과 대응, "코트라", ~, pp.Global Business Report 07-036 (2007)
- 한광수, "오바마 시대, 미중관계와 한국의 선택 : 미국이 북한과 직접대화에 나서게 되는 경우", 친디아저널 (2009)
- 한광수, "최근 미중 통상관계의 특징 : 미국발 금융위기의 영향을 중심으로", 2009년도 경제학공동학술대회 발표논문 (2009)
- CCTV 경제30분팀, "무역전쟁" (2011), 랜덤하우스
- "The U.S.-China Economic Relationship: In Need of Counseling, Not Divorce, Web Memo #2249(The Heritage Foundation)" (2009)[URL]
- Jeffry A. Frieden, "International Political Economy : Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth(Fourth Edition)" (2004), Routledge
- 조지프 E. 스티글리츠, "모두에게 공정한 무역: 세계화의 새로운 목표와 미완의 과제들" (2007), 지식의 숲
- Robert Gilpin, "세계정치경제론" (2004), 인간사랑
- United States Trade Representative, "U.S.-China Trade Relations: Entering a New Phase of Greater Accountability and Enforcement", Top-to-Bottom Review (2006)
- "Import Injury Investigations Case Statistics(FY 1980-2007)" (2008)[URL]
- Understanding the Sources of Friction in U.S.-China Trade Relations: The Exchange Rate Debate Diverts Attention from Optimum Adjustment, "Wing Thye Woo", Brookings Institution, 3~, pp.Asian Economic Papers 7
