新文化運動期 中國知識人의 사유체계 연구 ― 東西文化論戰을 중심으로
A Study on the Chinese Intellectuals’ Thinking Structure: focused on the East-West Cultural Debate
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The debate about East-West Culture arose from 1915 to 1927. This debate was progressed through three stage. In the first stagethat was begun in the La Jeunesse(新靑年) in 1915, ChenDu-xiu(陳獨秀), Li Da-zhao(李大釗) and Du Ya-Quan(杜亞泉) was thesaid persons of this debate. Chen Du-xiu(陳獨秀) and Li Da-zhao(李大釗) was representatives of western culture group and DuYa-Quan(杜亞泉) was that of eastern culture group. They had aheated discussion about the distinction and superiority betweeneastern culture and western culture. In the second stage that arose right after the May 4thMovement, the hot issue of the debate was the problem ofharmony between eastern culture and western culture. At thattime, under the circumstances that the western culture crowed intochina, Zhang Shi-zhao(章士釗) proclaimed the theory of‘Harmonization of the old and the new' in 1919. In the third stage, the debate was developed over the east-westculture's status and value in the world culture. Liang Shu-ming(梁漱溟) published East-West culture and it's Philosophy(東西文化及其哲學) early in 1920. He regarded three cultural systems (that is,western culture, indian culture and eastern culture) as threesequential stages of civilization development. This point of viewcaused a hot dispute, and Hu Shi(胡適), Li Da-zhao(李大釗) and QuQiu-bai(瞿秋白) took part in this debate. The debate about East-West Culture showed that Chineseintellectuals tried to look for a solution for the coexistence underthe collision between two cultures in the process of modernization. In this article, I would like to investigate and research chineseintellectuals' mentalities and orientations in the debate aboutEast-West Culture.
Abstract
The debate about East-West Culture arose from 1915 to 1927. This debate was progressed through three stage. In the first stagethat was begun in the La Jeunesse(新靑年) in 1915, ChenDu-xiu(陳獨秀), Li Da-zhao(李大釗) and Du Ya-Quan(杜亞泉) was thesaid persons of this debate. Chen Du-xiu(陳獨秀) and Li Da-zhao(李大釗) was representatives of western culture group and DuYa-Quan(杜亞泉) was that of eastern culture group. They had aheated discussion about the distinction and superiority betweeneastern culture and western culture. In the second stage that arose right after the May 4thMovement, the hot issue of the debate was the problem ofharmony between eastern culture and western culture. At thattime, under the circumstances that the western culture crowed intochina, Zhang Shi-zhao(章士釗) proclaimed the theory of‘Harmonization of the old and the new' in 1919. In the third stage, the debate was developed over the east-westculture's status and value in the world culture. Liang Shu-ming(梁漱溟) published East-West culture and it's Philosophy(東西文化及其哲學) early in 1920. He regarded three cultural systems (that is,western culture, indian culture and eastern culture) as threesequential stages of civilization development. This point of viewcaused a hot dispute, and Hu Shi(胡適), Li Da-zhao(李大釗) and QuQiu-bai(瞿秋白) took part in this debate. The debate about East-West Culture showed that Chineseintellectuals tried to look for a solution for the coexistence underthe collision between two cultures in the process of modernization. In this article, I would like to investigate and research chineseintellectuals' mentalities and orientations in the debate aboutEast-West Culture.
참고문헌 (52)
- 陳崧, "五四前後東西文化問題論戰文選" (1989), 中國社會科學出版社
- 季羨林, "東西文化議論集(上下册)" (1997), 經濟日報出版社
- 竹內實, "中國近現代論爭年表" (2005), 中國文聯出版社
- 趙立彬, "民族立場與現代追究 : 20世紀20~40年代的全盤西化思潮" (2005), 生活讀書新知三聯書店
- 梁漱溟, "東西文化及其哲学" (2010), 商務印書館
- 汪暉, "文化與政治的變奏 ― 戰爭, 革命與1910年代的‘思想論戰’", 中國社會科學, (4) (2009)
- 王元化, "杜亞泉文存⋅代序" (2003), 上海敎育出版社
- 汪永平, "20世紀初東西文化論戰中‘西化派’的歷史困境", 西南工業大學學報 (2004)
- 劉潤忠, "東方雜誌與‘五四’前後東西文化論爭", 社會科學戰線, (3) (1994)
- 高强, "‘東西文化’問題新探", 理論與改革 (1994)
- 周文玖, "東西文化論爭與中國現代化道路之探索——以20世紀二三十年代爲考察中心", 天津師範大學學報 (2009)
- 伏炎安, "重評杜亞泉的東西文化調和觀", 吉首大學學報 (2005)
- 伏炎安, "杜亞泉的東西文化調和觀的形成", 周末文滙學術導刊, (1) (2006)
- 董恩强, "杜亞泉的文化思想", 華中師範大學學報 (2000)
- 王青, "第二次東西文化論戰中的‘第三種文明’觀", 東疆學刊 (2006)
- 陸小寧, "迷途中的文化探索", 中州學刊, (3) (2000)
- 李少兵, "民國時期佛敎界東西文化觀硏究", 史學月刊, (2) (1998)
- 盧永欣, "梁漱溟: ‘意欲’與東西文化", 廣西大學學報 (2006)
- 郭正秋, "五四前東西文化論爭簡析", 求實 (2004)
- 杜艶華, "五四前後的東西文化論戰與中國文化的走向", 探索與爭鳴 (2004)
- 賀巧娟, "'五四”时期的三次東西文化論戰", 大衆文藝 (2008)
- 鄭大華, "20世紀 90年代 以來 五四東西文化論戰 硏究述評", 廣州大學學報 (2006)
- 武聖强, "近年來五四時期東西文化論戰硏究綜述", 北京黨史, (3) (2005)
- 譚雙泉, "五四時期的東西文化論戰", 湖南師範大學社會科學學報, (6) (1999)
- 陶紅霞, "李大釗對東西文化的審視與評判", 文史縱橫, (10) (2008)
- 汪振軍, "陳獨秀與杜亞泉的東西文化論爭", 鄭州輕工業學院學報 (2004)
- 馬海杰, "淺談五四前期陳獨秀杜亞泉東西文化之爭辯", 中州大學學報 (2006)
- 王代莉, "激進論與調和論:新文化運動時期的兩種文化建設方案", 敎育文化論壇, (6) (2012)
- 高力克, "重評杜亞泉與陳獨秀的東西文化論戰", 近代史研究 (1994)
- 晁罡, "在激進與保守之間——論梁啓超的東西文化觀", 平頂山師專學報 (2001)
- 邵長虎, "論梁漱溟的東西文化比較觀", 哈爾濱學院學報 (2004)
- 熊呂茂, "評梁漱溟的東西文化觀", 孔子硏究, (5) (2001)
- 馬立新, "‘五四’東西文化論戰新探", 山東師範大學學報, (2) (2004)
- 鄭大華, "重評‘五四’前后的‘東西文化論戰’", 湖南師範大學社會科學學報 (2003)
- 冬烘剛, "張東蓀視角下的五四東西文化論爭", 四川敎育學院學報 (2008)
- 白盾, "論胡適的東西文化觀", 黄山高等專科學校學報 (2001)
- 尹錫南, "太戈爾1924年訪華在中國知識界的反響", 南亞硏究季刊, (4) (2001)
- 문선영, "오사시기 동서문화론 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2004
- 강중기, "양수명의 현대 신유학", 박사, 동양철학, pp.2000
- 홍완표, "양수명 동서문화관 연구", 석사, 유교경전, pp.2003
- 홍석표, "근대 중국의 중서문화충돌과 인간에 대한 이해", 중국현대문학, (16) (1999)
- 권용옥, "梁漱溟 東西文化觀의 현대적 의의", 中國學硏究, 21 (2001)
- 서광덕, "1920년대 東西文化論戰과 '格義'의 문제 - 梁漱溟의 東西文化論을 중심으로", 중국현대문학, (39), pp.79~105 (2006), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 강명희, "5ㆍ4시기 中國의 ‘제3의 新文明’ 건설 탐색 - 硏究系 梁啓超를 중심으로 -", 중국근현대사연구, (44), pp.25~60 (2009), 중국근현대사학회
- 천성림, "20세기초 중국에서의 ‘國粹’와 反 ‘國粹’ 논쟁", 梨大史苑, 30 (1997)
- 김덕균, "梁漱溟의 동서문화 비교에 대한 연구", 儒敎思想硏究, 10 (1998)
- 공상철, "‘5.4시기’ 문화보수주의의 담론구조 고찰 ― 梁漱溟의 동서문화와 그 철학을 중심으로", 중국어문논총, 18 (2000)
- 홍석표, "梁漱溟의 동서문화론과 중국문화부흥의 학술적 담론", 중국어문학지, (35), pp.39~76 (2011), 중국어문학회
- 최홍식, "梁漱溟 文化哲學의 理論體系에 관한 연구", 동양철학연구, 33, pp.361~392 (2003), 동양철학연구회
- 이태실, "蔡元培의 중서문화융합론 연구", 學林, 14 (1992)
- 이승모, "풍우란의 중서문화관에 대한 일고찰", 범한철학, 51(4), pp.141~169 (2008), 범한철학회
- 백지운, "반면교사로서의 유럽 - 량치차오(梁啓超)의 ＂구유심영록(歐游心影錄)＂에 대한 일고찰", 중국현대문학, (39), pp.165~192 (2006), 한국중국현대문학학회