본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

명대 문무관 상복(常服) 흉배의 제도와 문양 변천 연구

A Study on the Transition of the System & Patterns of Official's Sangbok Insignia Badge in the Ming Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의상

초록

Hyoongbae, an insignia badge, is attached to the official uniform or robe to distinguish the status and rank of the wearer. This study reviewed the system and patterns of official's sangbok Hyoongbae in the Ming Dynasty. The study results are as follows. Since the first document that stipulated the Hyeongbae system in the Ming dynasty was 『Liyi dingshi』, published in the 20th year of the Hongwu Emperor, this study proposed to enact it as the year of the Hyoongbae system. In the early days of the Hyoongbae system, two ranks used one to three patterns. However, in 1537, it was changed to an exclusive method using one rank for one pattern. Due to these changes, it is presumed that the combination of tiger and leopard patterns was separated into a tiger pattern and a leopard pattern. The images of the Hyoongbae in 『Da Ming Huidian』, which was written in the Wanli Emperor period, were revised based on the Zhengde Emperor period version. The Hyoongbae pattern of the Wanli Emperor period was more realistic and lively than the Zhengde Emperor period and was arranged in harmony with the background. The size of the focal point pattern was depicted as large in the Zhengde Emperor period version and small in the Wanli Emperor period version. It can be assumed that the Zhengde Emperor period version emphasized the focal point pattern, and the Wanli Emperor period version placed weight on the harmony between the focal point and the background. The image of the Hyoongbae of 『Sancai Tuhui』 was different from 『Da Ming Huidian』 in the state and number of the focal point patterns, etc. This study provides a theoretical background for the emergence of a tiger patterned Hyoongbae in the middle of the 16th century in the Joseon Dynasty.

Abstract

Hyoongbae, an insignia badge, is attached to the official uniform or robe to distinguish the status and rank of the wearer. This study reviewed the system and patterns of official's sangbok Hyoongbae in the Ming Dynasty. The study results are as follows. Since the first document that stipulated the Hyeongbae system in the Ming dynasty was 『Liyi dingshi』, published in the 20th year of the Hongwu Emperor, this study proposed to enact it as the year of the Hyoongbae system. In the early days of the Hyoongbae system, two ranks used one to three patterns. However, in 1537, it was changed to an exclusive method using one rank for one pattern. Due to these changes, it is presumed that the combination of tiger and leopard patterns was separated into a tiger pattern and a leopard pattern. The images of the Hyoongbae in 『Da Ming Huidian』, which was written in the Wanli Emperor period, were revised based on the Zhengde Emperor period version. The Hyoongbae pattern of the Wanli Emperor period was more realistic and lively than the Zhengde Emperor period and was arranged in harmony with the background. The size of the focal point pattern was depicted as large in the Zhengde Emperor period version and small in the Wanli Emperor period version. It can be assumed that the Zhengde Emperor period version emphasized the focal point pattern, and the Wanli Emperor period version placed weight on the harmony between the focal point and the background. The image of the Hyoongbae of 『Sancai Tuhui』 was different from 『Da Ming Huidian』 in the state and number of the focal point patterns, etc. This study provides a theoretical background for the emergence of a tiger patterned Hyoongbae in the middle of the 16th century in the Joseon Dynasty.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 하명은, "날짐승흉배의 감정(鑑定)을 위한 기준 설정", 한복문화, 10(3), pp.161~177 (2007), 한복문화학회
  2. 심연옥, "조선전기 직금흉배직물 연구", 한국의상디자인학회지, 15(4), pp.113~128 (2013), 한국의상디자인학회
  3. "世宗實錄 卷88", ~
  4. "中宗實錄 卷32", ~
  5. "宣祖實錄 卷23", ~
  6. 고인덕, "조선시대에 있어서 도설백과사전 「三才圖會」의 수용", 중국어문학논집, (77), pp.607~625 (2012), 중국어문학연구회
  7. 李康七, "明, 淸時代의 文武官補(胸背) 制度,胸背", pp.115~130 (1974), 繡林苑
  8. 裵貞龍, "韓ㆍ中文官胸背樣式比較小考", 韓國服飾, 7, pp.7~60 (1989)
  9. 김영재, "중국과 우리나라 흉배(胸背)에 관한 고찰", 韓服文化, 3(3), pp.45~54 (2000)
  10. 정혜란, "중국흉배와 한국 흉배의 비교 고찰", 고문화, (57), pp.211~231 (2001), 한국대학박물관협회
  11. 송수진, "한국과 중국의 흉배 연구", 석사, 의류학과, pp.2013
  12. "사고전서본"[URL]
  13. "大明會典(正德本) 卷58 禮部17 冠服2 文武官冠服常服"[URL]
  14. 이주영, "명 홍무연간 문무관 공복의 제정과 개정 시기 재검토", 복식, 63(5), pp.87~101 (2013), 한국복식학회[DOI]
  15. 溫少華, "명대 익선관복 연구", 박사, pp.2021
  16. "大明集禮卷 17", ~
  17. "大明集禮卷 40 冠服圖"[URL]
  18. "禮儀定式官員服色衣服花樣"[URL]
  19. "諸司職掌禮部卷4 冠服文武官冠服常服花樣"[URL]
  20. "明太祖高皇帝實錄 卷209", ~
  21. "바이두백과"[URL]
  22. "大明會典(萬曆本) 卷61", ~
  23. "明世宗肅皇帝實錄 卷198", ~
  24. "三才圖會衣服卷2 國朝冠服羣臣冠服"[URL]
  25. 이은주, "조선시대 예복과 흉배, 색을 입히고 수를 놓다", 국립무형유산원, 219~ (2019)
  26. 이주영, "임진왜란기(1592~1598) 상급 수군 흑단령 일습의 조형 특성과 일러스트 제안", 복식, 70(5), pp.80~97 (2020), 한국복식학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)