본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근

Two Types of Korean Anaphor caki

허세문
사단법인 한국언어학회 (The Linguistic Society of Korea)|2014.12|언어학 (EONEOHAG)|제70호|pp. 141-178|DOI 10.17290/jlsk.2014..70.141

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

cakilocal reflexivelogophorattitude context
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper presents a separate analysis on two types of Korean anaphor cakicontaining local vs. non-local antecedents. Previous studies attempt to explainthis peculiar property of caki by providing a unified licensing condition forboth types of caki. Based on the observation on the 1st/2nd person restriction(PR) on caki, however, this paper argues that the local caki must be separatedfrom the long-distance (LD) caki. Since the PR of the local caki can beobviated in certain environments unlike the LD caki, if we suppose that thereis only one type of caki binding, it is hard to account for such a contrast. Toexplain this, this paper proposes that LD caki is a logohpor which is designedto refer to the participants of an attitude context. Various properties of the LDcaki can be explained by the nature of a logophor including the Blockingeffect, the subject orientedness condition, the PR, the 2nd person caki readingand so on. As for the local caki, this paper proposes that it is just a localreflexive. It is argued that if caki is bound in (so called) a proper bindingdomain, it exhibits the same behavioral properties of local reflexives. Giventhis, this paper suggest that the PR and its obviation in local caki are allattributed to the nature of the phi feature match between a bound variable andits antecedent in a local binding relation.

Abstract

This paper presents a separate analysis on two types of Korean anaphor cakicontaining local vs. non-local antecedents. Previous studies attempt to explainthis peculiar property of caki by providing a unified licensing condition forboth types of caki. Based on the observation on the 1st/2nd person restriction(PR) on caki, however, this paper argues that the local caki must be separatedfrom the long-distance (LD) caki. Since the PR of the local caki can beobviated in certain environments unlike the LD caki, if we suppose that thereis only one type of caki binding, it is hard to account for such a contrast. Toexplain this, this paper proposes that LD caki is a logohpor which is designedto refer to the participants of an attitude context. Various properties of the LDcaki can be explained by the nature of a logophor including the Blockingeffect, the subject orientedness condition, the PR, the 2nd person caki readingand so on. As for the local caki, this paper proposes that it is just a localreflexive. It is argued that if caki is bound in (so called) a proper bindingdomain, it exhibits the same behavioral properties of local reflexives. Giventhis, this paper suggest that the PR and its obviation in local caki are allattributed to the nature of the phi feature match between a bound variable andits antecedent in a local binding relation.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 임홍빈, "국어의 재귀사 연구" (1987), 신구문화사
  2. 장석진, "조응의 담화 기능: 재귀표현을 중심으로", 한글, pp.121~155 (1986), 한글학회
  3. 최기용, "한국어 주격 중출 구문의 두 유형: 속격", 주격 교체의 경우, 2008, pp.33(4), 901~928[DOI]
  4. Adesola, O., "Pronouns and Null Operators: A-bar Dependencies and Relations in Yorùbá", 박사, pp.2005
  5. Anand, P, "De de se", 박사, pp.2006
  6. Anand, P, "The cross-linguistic manifestations of de se expressions, Handout in Arché", CSMN Mini-course & Workshop: De Se Attitudes (2009), CSMN, University of Oslo
  7. Chierchia, G, "Semantics and Contextual Expression", pp.1~32 (1989), Foris
  8. Cho, D.-I, "Anaphor or pronominal", Language Research, 32, pp.621~636 (1996)
  9. Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  10. Chomsky, N, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  11. Cole, P, "Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
  12. Fox, D, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
  13. Giorgi, A, "From temporal anchoring to long distance anaphors", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 24, pp.1009~1047 (2006)
  14. Han, C.-H, "Semantic binding of long-distance anaphor caki in Korean", Language, 88, pp.764~790 (2012)
  15. Hellan, L, "Anaphora in Norwegian and the theory of grammar" (1988), Foris
  16. Heim, I, "Phi Theory" (2008), Oxford University Press
  17. Hoe, S, "On the 1st", 2nd person restriction of Korean anaphor caki and its implications, pp.49, ~
  18. Huang, C.-T. J, "Long-Distance Reflexives", pp.141~192 (2001), Academic Press
  19. Kaplan, D, "Themes from Kaplan" (1989), Oxford University Press
  20. Kim, J.-H, "Long-distance bound local anaphors in Korean: an empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin", Lingua, 119, pp.733~755 (2009)
  21. Kim, S.-Y, "Acceptability and preference in the interpretation of anaphors", Linguistics, 38, pp.315~353 (2000)
  22. 김수연, "Opacity in the Interpretation of Anaphors", 언어, 32(4), pp.557~579 (2007), 한국언어학회
  23. Kim, S, "Sloppy", strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis, 1999, pp.8, 255~284
  24. Kratzer, A, "Making a pronoun", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.187~237 (2009)
  25. Kuno, S, "Empathy and syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.625~672 (1977)
  26. Lasnik, H, "Working minimalism", pp.189~215 (1999), MIT Press
  27. Lee, C, "Issues in Korean anaphora", Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, pp.339~358 (1988), University of Toronto
  28. Lim, K, "A Split Analysis of CAKI-binding in Korean", 박사, pp.1998
  29. Moulton, K, "Natural Selection and the Syntax of Clausal Complementation", 박사, pp.2009
  30. Miyagawa, S, "Why Agree? Why Move" (2010), MIT Press
  31. Miyagawa, S, "Main Clause Phenomena", pp.79~112 (2012), John Benjamins
  32. Obata, M, "Root, Successive-Cyclic and Feature-Splitting Internal Merge", 박사, pp.2011
  33. O’Grady, W, "The interpretation of Korean anaphora", Language, 63, pp.251~277 (1987)
  34. Oshima, D. Y, "Perspectives in reported discourse", 박사, pp.2006
  35. Otani, K, "V-raising and VP-ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, pp.345~358 (1991)
  36. Park, S.-K, "Parametrizing the theory of binding: The implications of caki in Korean", Language Research, 22, pp.229~253 (1986)
  37. Reinhart, T, "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
  38. Reuland, E, "The Linguistic Enterprises", pp.257~281 (2010), John Benjamin Publishing Company
  39. Rooryck, J, "Dissolving binding theory" (2011), Oxford University Press
  40. Saito, M, "Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects", pp.143~165 (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  41. Sauerland, U, "Presuppositions and the alternative tier", Proceedings of SALT, 23, pp.156~173 (2013)
  42. Schlenker, P, "The Handbook of Semantics" (2011), Mouton de Gruyter
  43. Sells, P, "Aspects of logophoricity", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.445~479 (1987)
  44. Sharvit, Y, "Covaluation and Unexpected BT Effect", Journal of Semantics, 28, pp.55~106 (2011)
  45. Sohng, H.-K, "Topics in the syntax of East Asian languages", 박사, pp.2003
  46. Storoshenko, D. R, "A bound variable account of the Korean reflexive caki", Proceedings of Wccfl, 26, pp.438~444 (2008)
  47. Sudo, Y, "On the Semantics of Phi Features on Pronouns", 박사, pp.2012
  48. Yang, D.-W, "Control and binding in Korean", Linguistic Journal of Korean, 7, pp.257~823 (1982)
  49. Yang, D.-W, "The Dual Property of Anaphors", Language Research, 27, pp.407~435 (1991)
  50. Yoon, J.-M, "Long-distance anaphors in Korean and their cross-linguistic implications", Proceedings of CLS, 25, pp.479~495 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

피결속-변항 대명사로서의 ‘자기’최기용한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2014 · 제24권 제2호한국어 재귀사 ‘자기’의 속성엄홍준한국언어학회 · 언어2014 · 제39권 제4호“-self”와 “자기”의 화용적 지시성에 관한 연구오명기언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2010 · 제52호Logophors and Discourse Participants강남길대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2010 · 제52권 제3호Lack of the Blocking Effect in Korean Long Distance Anaphors김미숙대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2017 · 제59권 제2호한국어의 다양한 인칭 제약에 대한 소고허세문언어정보연구소 · 언어와 정보 사회2020 · 제40권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

심도 청각장애 아동의 음질 특성: H1-H2와 스펙트럼 기울기를 중심으로최은아, 성철재, 박한상pp. 3-17배수 표현의 의미 혼동에 대한 분석과 제언김종휘pp. 19-44일본 外務省藏版 19세기 말 조선어 교재의 언어 사용 양상과 특징:『교린수지』와『인어대방』을 중심으로이민아, 김주필pp. 45-69일본어의 길이 단위 ‘모라’의 특수성에 관한 연구하타나카츠유미, 박시균pp. 71-92음운 현상의 동기적 비일관성과 음운 이론강희조pp. 93-115
원문 보기