본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“-self”와 “자기”의 화용적 지시성에 관한 연구

Pragmatic Referentiality of “-self” and “caki”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study aims to provide the pragmatic analysis of the English anaphor “-self” and the Korean anaphor “caki”, the distribution of which cannot be captured even under the Minimalist notion of Binding. Based on the notion of logophoricity (Reinhart and Reuland 1993, among others) and deictic usage (Iida 1996, Smith 2004, among others), we argue that “-self” and “caki” can be used as logophoric expressions, the interpretation of which is sometimes influenced by deictic elements of the utterance, i.e., their logophoric interpretation is influenced by deictic elements in the context as the deictic center changes. We also argue that the seemingly referentially independent noun “caki” belongs to deictic expression referring an implicit argument in the context.

Abstract

This study aims to provide the pragmatic analysis of the English anaphor “-self” and the Korean anaphor “caki”, the distribution of which cannot be captured even under the Minimalist notion of Binding. Based on the notion of logophoricity (Reinhart and Reuland 1993, among others) and deictic usage (Iida 1996, Smith 2004, among others), we argue that “-self” and “caki” can be used as logophoric expressions, the interpretation of which is sometimes influenced by deictic elements of the utterance, i.e., their logophoric interpretation is influenced by deictic elements in the context as the deictic center changes. We also argue that the seemingly referentially independent noun “caki” belongs to deictic expression referring an implicit argument in the context.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Adger, D, "Merge and Move: Wh-dependencies Revisited", LI, 36, pp.161~193 (2005)
  2. Ariel, M, "Interpreting Anaphoric Expressions: A Cognitive versus A Pragmatic Approach", Journal of Linguistics, 30, pp.3~42 (1994)
  3. Baltin, M, "A Landing Site Theory of Movement Rules", LI, 13(1), pp.1~38 (1982)
  4. Cantrall, W, "Viewpoint, Reflexives and the Nature of Noun Phrases" (1974), Mouton
  5. Cho, S-W, "Caki (self) as a Jekyl and Hyde", 석사, pp.2006
  6. Choi, D. I, "Binding Principles for Long Distance Anaphors", Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, pp.57~72 (1997)
  7. Chomsky, N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  8. Chomsky, N, "Knowledge of Language; Its Nature, Origin and Use" (1986), Prager
  9. Chomsky, N, "A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. in: The View from Building 20" (1993), MIT Press
  10. Chomsky, N, "Categories and Transformations. in: In The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  11. Chomsky, N, "Derivation by Phase", MITOPL, 18 (1999)
  12. Chomsky, N, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. in: Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  13. Chomsky, N, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy. in: Ken Hale: A Life in Language" (2004), MIT Press
  14. Chomsky, N, "On Phases", 석사, pp.2005
  15. Clemets, N, "The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse", Journal of West African Languages, 10, pp.141~177 (1975)
  16. Cole, P., "Principles and Parameters of Long Distance Reflexives", LI, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
  17. Everaert, M, "Reflexives in Discourse", 석사, Nijmegen U, 2002
  18. Gill, K-H, "Phase and Long-distance Antecedent", 석사, pp.2005
  19. Grundy, P, "Doing Pragmatics" (2000), Arnold
  20. Hagege, C, "Les Pronoms Logophoriques", Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris, 69, pp.287~310 (1974)
  21. Hara, T, "Anaphoric Dependencies in Japanese", 박사, pp.2002
  22. Harris, J, "The Grammar of Irish English. in: Real English. The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles", pp.139~186 (1993), Longman
  23. Hicks, G, "Deriving Condition A", York Papers in Linguistics, pp.91~131 (2005)
  24. Hornstein, N, "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2000), Blackwell
  25. Iida, M, "Context and Binding in Japanese" (1996), CSLI Publications
  26. Inoue, K, "Reflexivization: An Interpretive Approach. in: Syntax & Semantics 5", pp.117~200 (1976), Academy Press
  27. Johnson, K, "Binding Theory Paradoxes", 석사, pp.2005
  28. Keenan, E, "On Semantics and the Binding Theory. in: Explaining Language Universals", pp.105~144 (1988), Blackwell
  29. Kuno, S, "Functional Syntax" (1987), University of Chicago Press
  30. Lee-Schoenfeld, V, "Binding by Phase: (Non) Complementarity in German", 석사, pp.2004
  31. Legate, J. A, "Some Interface Properties of the Phase", LI, 34, pp.506~516 (2003)
  32. Levinson, S. C, "Pragmatics and the Grammar of Anaphora: A Partial Pragmatic Reduction of Binding and Control Phenomena", Journal of Linguistics, 23, pp.379~434 (1987)
  33. Levinson, S. C, "Pragmatic Reduction of the Binding Conditions Revisited", Journal of Linguistics, 27, pp.107~161 (1991)
  34. Matushansky, O, "Going through a Phase", Proceedings of the MIT Workshop on EPP and Phases (2004)
  35. Miller, J, "The Grammar of Scottish. in: Real English. The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles", pp.99~138 (1993), Longman
  36. Nissenbaum, J, "Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement", 박사, pp.2000
  37. Pollard, C, "Anaphors in English and the Scope of Binding Theory", LI, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
  38. Pollard, C, "Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar" (1994), U. of Chicago Press
  39. Reinhart, T, "Strategies of Anaphora Resolution. in: Interface Strategies" (2000), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  40. Reinhart, T, "Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. in: LI Monograph 45" (2006), MIT Press
  41. Reinhart, T, "Reflexivity", LI, 24(4), pp.657~720 (1993)
  42. Reinhart, T, "The Lexicon-syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operation", LI, 36(3) (2005)
  43. Reuland, E, "Primitives of Binding", LI, 32(3), pp.439~492 (2001)
  44. Reuland, E, "Binding Conditions: How are They Derived?", Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS Proceedings of the HPSG05 Conference (2005)
  45. Ross, J, "On Declarative Sentences. in: Readings in English Transformational Grammar" (1970), Ginn and Co
  46. Runner, J., "Logophors in Possessed Picture Noun Phrases", WCCFL 21 Proceedings, pp.401~414 (2002)
  47. Runner, J., "Processing Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrases", 석사, pp.2003
  48. Safir, K, "Semantic Atoms of Anaphora", NLLT, 14, pp.545~589 (1996)
  49. Safir, K, "The Syntax of Anaphora" (2004), University Press
  50. Sells, P, "Aspects of Logophoricity", LI, 18 (1987)
  51. Smith, M, "Light and Heavy Reflexives", Linguistics, 42, pp.573~615 (2004)
  52. Speas, P, "Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles. in: Asymmetry in Grammar", pp.315~343 (2003), John Benjamins
  53. Tenny. C, "Short Distance Pronouns in Representational Noun Phrases and a Grammar of Sentience", 석사, pp.2003
  54. Thornton. R, "Principle B, VP Ellipsis and Interpretation in Child Grammars" (1999), MIT Press
  55. "Webster Dictionary" (2000), Merriam-Webster Inc
  56. Wilkins, W, "Thematic Structure and Reflexivization", Syntax and Semantics, 21, pp.191~213 (1988)
  57. Zribi-Hertz, A, "A-type Binding and Narrative Point of View", Language, 65, pp.695~727 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)