한국어의 다양한 인칭 제약에 대한 소고

키워드

참고문헌 (60)

1. 김병건, "{-다}와 {-어}의 변별과 담화에서의 효과", 한글, (304), pp.89~115 (2014), 한글학회
2. 김세중, "국어 심리술어의 어휘의미구조", 박사, 언어학, pp.1994
3. 김차균, "국어 시제 형태소의 의미", 한글, 169, pp.45~116 (1980), 한글학회
4. 노은주, "사적 술어의 인칭 제약에 대한 화용론적 연구", 언어, 43(1), pp.21~42 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
5. 송재목, "증거성(evidentiality)과 주어제약의 유형론-한국어, 몽골어, 티벳어를 예로 들어-", 형태론, 9(1), pp.1~23 (2007), 형태론
6. 유현경, "국어 형용사 연구" (1998), 한국문화사
7. 유현경, "한국어 용언의 인칭 제약에 대한 연구", 國語學, (83), pp.65~92 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
8. 이정민, "심리술어와 1인칭: 증거성의 문제", 언어, 41(4), pp.679~713 (2016), 한국언어학회[DOI]
9. 장석진, "조응의 담화 기능 : 재귀표현을 중심으로", 한글, 194, pp.121~155 (1986), 한글학회
10. 정연주, "‘-어 하-’와 통합하는 객관형용사의 의미 특성", 한국어 의미학, 33, pp.297~319 (2010), 한국어의미학회
11. 최기용, "피결속-변항 대명사로서의 ‘자기’", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.325~364 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
12. 허세문, "한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근", 언어학, (70), pp.141~178 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
13. 허세문, "주관적 심리술어의 의미와 제약에 대한 통사적 접근", (사)한국언어학회 여름 학술 대회 (2017), 충북대학교
14. 허세문, "‘자기’의 인칭 제약과 그 함의에 대한 소고", 언어와 정보, 24(2), pp.51~76 (2020), 한국언어정보학회[DOI]
15. 허세문, "화자지향 심리술어와 증거성 표지 ‘-더’의 1인칭 제약", 언어와 정보, 19(2), pp.81~107 (2015), 한국언어정보학회
16. AnderBois, S., "An Illocutionary Account of Reportative Evidentials in Imperatives", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 27, pp.459~479 (2017)
17. Bylinina, L., "The Landscape of Perspective Shifting, A handout presented at Pronouns in Embedded Contexts at the Syntax-Semantics Interface", Universität Tübingen, ~ (2014)
18. Choi, J., "Free Choice and Negative Polarity", Ph.D, pp.2007
19. Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use" (1986), Praeger
20. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
21. Chung, K. -S., "Spatial Deictic Tense and Evidentials in Korean", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.187~219 (2007)
22. Cole, P., "Principles and Parameters of Long-distance Reflexive", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
23. Farkas, D., "Division of Labor in the Interpretation of Declaratives and Interrogatives", Journal of Semantics, 34, pp.237~289 (2017)
24. von Fintel, K., "Must … Stay … Strong", Natural Language Semantics, 18, pp.351~383 (2010)
25. Gunlogson, C., "True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English", Ph.D, pp.2001
26. Gunlogson, C., "A Question of Commitment", Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp.101~136 (2008)
27. Huang, C. T. J., "Long-distance Reflexives", pp.141~192 (2001), Academic Press
28. Kalsang, J. G., "Direct Evidentials, Case, Tense and Aspect in Tibetan", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31, pp.517~561 (2013)
29. Kim, M.-J., "Domain Restriction in Freedom of Choice:Korean Indet-na Items", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 11, pp.375~389 (2006)
30. Kim, Y. -J., "The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case", Ph.D, pp.1990
31. Kratzer, A., "Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.639~650 (1991), Walter de Gruyter
32. Kratzer, A., "Making a Pronoun", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.187~237 (2009)
33. Kuroda, S. -Y., "A Festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.377~391 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
34. Kwon, I., "The Viewpoint Shifter-eha-in Korean and How it Affects Causal Event Structure", Language Science, 42, pp.30~42 (2014)
35. Kuno, S., "Empathy and Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.625~672 (1977)
36. Lee, C., "Abstract Syntax and Korean with Reference to English", Ph.D, pp.1973
37. Lee, C., "Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics", pp.381~420 (2006), Elsevier
38. Lee, J., "A Modal Account of ‘First Person’ Constraints on Evidential Sentences", Paper presented in the 2011 J-K Preconference Workshop (2011), Seoul National University
39. Lee, J., "Temporal Constraints on the Meaning of Evidentiality", Natural Language Semantics, 21, pp.1~41 (2013)
40. Lim, D., "Evidentials and Interrogatives", Ph.D, pp.2010
41. 임동식, "On the Interaction between Lexical Aspects of Predicates and Evidentiality - A situation-semantics account -", 언어학, (70), pp.117~140 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
42. Malamud, S., "Three Ways to Avoid Commitments : Declarative Force Modifiers in the Conversational Scoreboard", Journal of Semantics, 32, pp.275~311 (2015)
43. McCready, E., "Context Shifting in Questions and Elsewhere", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 11, pp.433~447 (2007)
44. Miyagawa, S., "Agreement Beyond Phi" (2017), MIT Press
45. Nam, S., "Psychological Origos and Levels of Deixis", A handout presented at 2018 Seoul Linguistic Forum (2018), Seoul National University
46. Nishigauchi, T., "Reflexive Binding : Awareness and Empathy from a Syntactic Point of View", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 23, pp.157~206 (2013)
47. Northrup, O., "Grounds for Commitment", Ph.D, pp.2014
48. Oshima, D. Y., "Perspectives in Reported Discourse", Ph.D, pp.2006
49. Park, H., "Logophor, Empathy, and Long-distance Anaphors in East Asian Languages", Ph.D, pp.2015
50. Pollard, C., "Anaphors in English and the Scope of the Binding Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
51. Preminger, O., "Agreement and its Failure" (2014), MIT Press
52. Rooth, M., "Association with Focus", Ph.D, pp.1985
53. Sauerland, U., "Presuppositions and the Alternative Tier", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 23, pp.156~173 (2013)
54. Sohn, H. M., "Retrospection in Korean", Language Research, 11, pp.87~103 (1975)
55. Stalnaker, R., "Syntax and Semantics 9:Pragmatics", pp.315~332 (1978), Academic Press
56. Sudo, Y., "On the Semantics of Phi Features on Pronouns", Ph. D., pp.2012
57. Tenny, L. C., "Evidentiality, Experiencers, and the Syntax of Sentience in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15, pp.245~288 (2006)
58. Wang, Y., "Empathy and Chinese Long-distance Reflexive Ziji: Remarks on Giorgi (2006, 2007)", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, pp.307~322 (2015)
59. Wiiller, M., "An Update on Epistemic Modals", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44, pp.835~849 (2015)
60. Yoon, J. M., "Long-distance Anaphors in Korean and their Crosslinguistic Implications", Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 25: General Session, pp.479~495 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천