본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

피결속-변항 대명사로서의 ‘자기’

caki as a Bound-variable Pronoun

최기용
한국생성문법학회|2014.05|생성문법연구 (Studies in Generative Grammar)|제24권 제2호|pp. 325-364|DOI 10.15860/sigg.24.2.201405.325

0

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

KoreanC-commandcakisloppy readingbound-variable pronounlong-distance anaphorPrinciples B & Clogophoricity
주제분류언어학

초록

The article claims that caki in Korean is neither an anaphor nor areferential pronoun, but a bound-variable pronoun. This is supported bythe followings: (a) A-binding is unbounded, even available acrossislands, (b) A-bar binding is available, (c) caki cannot refer to a discourseentity, (d) discourse conditions which are supposed to hold for caki, suchas a viewpoint (Kuno 1973) or logophoricity (Sells 1987), are those thatare added over and above a C-command condition. (e) only a sloppyreading is available under keuleoha- VP ellipsis, (f) caki obeys Principle Cwhich is defined in terms of a pronoun as in Sportiche 2013, and (g)non referring expressions are available as extra-sentential ornon-c-commanding antecedents. Two apparent problems are shown to beresolved: (a) a violation of C-command under specific predicates orconstructions and (b) A-binding within a local domain. For the firstproblem, it is suggested that in underlying representations, caki obeysC-command. For the second problem, it is suggested that the fact thatantecedents of caki cannot be a speaker makes caki to be translated notas an x, but as an f(x), which eventually, leads to the satisfaction ofPrinciple B.

Abstract

The article claims that caki in Korean is neither an anaphor nor areferential pronoun, but a bound-variable pronoun. This is supported bythe followings: (a) A-binding is unbounded, even available acrossislands, (b) A-bar binding is available, (c) caki cannot refer to a discourseentity, (d) discourse conditions which are supposed to hold for caki, suchas a viewpoint (Kuno 1973) or logophoricity (Sells 1987), are those thatare added over and above a C-command condition. (e) only a sloppyreading is available under keuleoha- VP ellipsis, (f) caki obeys Principle Cwhich is defined in terms of a pronoun as in Sportiche 2013, and (g)non referring expressions are available as extra-sentential ornon-c-commanding antecedents. Two apparent problems are shown to beresolved: (a) a violation of C-command under specific predicates orconstructions and (b) A-binding within a local domain. For the firstproblem, it is suggested that in underlying representations, caki obeysC-command. For the second problem, it is suggested that the fact thatantecedents of caki cannot be a speaker makes caki to be translated notas an x, but as an f(x), which eventually, leads to the satisfaction ofPrinciple B.

참고문헌 (94)

  1. 강범모, "문법과 언어 사용--코퍼스에 기반한 재귀사 ‘자기, 자신, 자기자신’의 기능 분석을 중심으로", 국어학, 31, pp.165~204 (1998)
  2. 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
  3. 김용석, "‘자기’의 지시 의존에 관하여: 결속 이론 대 연결 이론", 언어, 12, pp.319~346 (1987)
  4. 김용석, "‘자기’의 대용화에 관하여", 생성 문법 연구, 2, pp.251~292 (1992)
  5. 김용석, "재귀사 주어 지향성에 관한 자질 점검 이론적 접근", 생성 문법연구, 6, pp.187~228 (1996)
  6. 金政大, "韓國語 再歸代名詞 '자기'에 關한 硏究", 석사, pp.1981
  7. 박진호, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어 대명사 체계의 특징", 國語學, (50), pp.115~147 (2007), 국어학회
  8. 박진호, "학여와 함께 하는 국어학", pp.45~64 (2009), 태학사
  9. 성광수, "국어 재귀 대명사에 대한 재고", 한글, 172 (1981)
  10. 양동휘, "확대 결속 이론", 한글, 188 (1985)
  11. 양동휘, "한국어의 대용사론", 국어학, 15 (1986)
  12. 이성범, "언어와 의미" (1999), 태학사
  13. 이익섭, "한국어의 재귀대명사에 대하여", 인문논총, 2 (1978)
  14. 이익섭, "국어 문법론 강의" (1999), 학연사
  15. 이현희, "조응 이론의 이원화-통사적 결속 원리와 의미, 논리적 결속 원리", 생성 문법 연구, 5, pp.49~61 (1995)
  16. 이정훈, "韓國語 後補充 構文의 構造", 어문연구(語文硏究), 37(2), pp.31~54 (2009), 한국어문교육연구회
  17. 이정훈, "한국어 후보충 구문의 몇 문제", 현대문법연구, 59(59), pp.119~132 (2010), 현대문법학회
  18. 이정훈, "후보충 구문의 구조와 Ω 그리고 빈칸", 현대문법연구, 64(64), pp.95~116 (2011), 현대문법학회
  19. 이정식, "Chung (2012)에 대한 회답: 국어 동사전 동사후요서 간의 비대칭성에 관하여", 생성문법연구, 23(2), pp.171~198 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
  20. 임홍빈, "국어의 재귀사 연구" (1987), 신구문화사
  21. 장석진, "조응의 담화 기능: 재귀표현을 중심으로", 한글, 194, pp.121~155 (1986)
  22. 조숙환, "‘걔’와 ‘자기’의 통사구조 및 습득 연구", 생성 문법 연구, 2(2), pp.361~391 (1992)
  23. 최기용, "한국어 격과 조사의 생성 통사론" (2009), 한국문화사
  24. 최기용, "한국어의 3인칭 지시 표현 ‘그’에 관한 소고", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.527~558 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
  25. 최현배, "깁고 고친 우리 말본" (1959), 정음사
  26. 홍기선, "영어와 국어의 인상 구문 비교 분석", 어학연구, 33, pp.409~434 (1997)
  27. 안희돈, "On Binding Asymmetries in Fragments", 언어학, 44(44), pp.123~155 (2006), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  28. Chang, Sun, "Korean reflexive pronoun caki and its referent NP’s point of view", Language Research, 13, pp.35~48 (1977)
  29. Cho, Dong-In, "Anaphor or pronominal?", Language Research, 32, pp.621~636 (1996)
  30. Cho, JunMo, "legibility and licensing of nominals", Selected papers from the twelfth international conference on Korean linguistics, pp.75~88 (2002), Kyungjin
  31. Cho, Sook Whan, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics VIII", pp.252~265 (1999), Hanshin Publishing Co
  32. Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), MIT Press
  33. Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use" (1986), Praeger
  34. 정대호, "An Elliptical Coordination Analysis of the Right Dislocated Construction in Korean", 언어학, 17(4), pp.1~23 (2009), 대한언어학회
  35. 정대호, "Replies to Lee (2009): In Defence of a Double Clause Approach to the Right Dislocated Construction", 현대문법연구, 61(61), pp.167~196 (2010), 현대문법학회
  36. 정대호, "Pre- vs. Post-verbal Asymmetries and the Syntax of Korean Right Dislocated Construction", 생성문법연구, 22(4), pp.703~721 (2012), 한국생성문법학회
  37. Cole, Peter, "Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
  38. Cole, Peter, "Feature percolation", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, pp.91~118 (1993)
  39. Cole, Peter, "Head movement and long-distance reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.355~406 (1994)
  40. Cole, Peter, "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. III", pp.21~84 (2006), Blackwell Publishing
  41. Elbourne, Paul, "The interpretation of pronouns", Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, pp.119~150 (2008)
  42. Evans, Gareth, "Pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.337~362 (1980)
  43. Han, Hak-Sung, "On reflexive movement", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 17, pp.203~238 (1992)
  44. Heim, Irene, "Semnantics in generative grammar" (1998), Blackwell Publishers
  45. Hong, Ki-Sun, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics II", pp.196~208 (1987), Hanshin Publishing Co
  46. Hong, Ki-Sun, "Argument selection and case marking in Korean", 박사, pp.1991
  47. Huang, C.-T. James, "Long-distance reflexives", pp.141~192 (2001), Academic Press
  48. Hunag, C.-T. James, "Long-distance anaphora", pp.263~282 (1991), Cambridge University Press
  49. Kang, Beom-mo, "Two theories on unbounded reflexives", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 12, pp.1~24 (1987)
  50. Kang, Beom-mo, "Unbounded reflexives", Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, pp.415~456 (1988)
  51. Kang, Young-Se, "Korean anaphora(I) : Caki as a resumptive pronoun", Language Research, 22, pp.215~228 (1986)
  52. Kim, Ji-Hye, "An experimental syntactic study of binding: A case study of Korean long-distance anaphor caki", Proceeding of the 23rd Pacific Asian Conference of language, information and computation, pp.250~259 (2009)
  53. Kim, Ji-Hye, "Long-distance bound local anaphors in Korean - An empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin", Lingua, 119, pp.733~755 (2009)
  54. Kim, Soo-Yeon, "Dependencies: A Study of anaphoricity and scrambling", 박사, pp.1996
  55. Kim, Soo-Yeon, "What should we do with Condition A", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 25, pp.291~314 (2000)
  56. Kratzer, Angelika, "Making a pronoun : False indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.187~237 (2009)
  57. Kuno, Susumu, "Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.161~195 (1972)
  58. Kuno, Susumu, "The structure of the Japanese language" (1973), MIT Press
  59. Larson, Richard, "Knowledge of meaning: An introduction to semantic theory" (1995), MIT Press
  60. Lasnik, Howard, "Remarks on coreference", Linguistic Analysis, 2, pp.1~22 (1976)
  61. Lasnik, Howard, "Pronouns and non-coreference", University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, 13, pp.214~227 (2004)
  62. Lee, Chungmin, "Abstract syntax and Korean with reference to English" (1974), Pan Korea Book
  63. Lee, Eun-Ji, "Locality of anaphoric dependence and SUBJECT", Studies in Generative Grammar, 4, pp.357~370 (1994)
  64. Lee, Eun-Ji, "Specified Subject Condition and clause-type restrictions in long-distance reflexives", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 25, pp.675~692 (2000)
  65. Lee, Gunsoo, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics VII", pp.384~398 (1997), Hanshin Publishing Co
  66. Lee, Gunsoo, "A minimalist account of long-distance anaphor kucasin", Studies in Generative Grammar, 11, pp.383~404 (2001)
  67. Lee, Gunsoo, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics X", pp.558~567 (2004), Hanshin Publishing Co
  68. 이건수, "Acyclic Adjunction of Casin as a Way of Deriving the LDB Effects of Korean Complex Anaphors", 언어학, 16(2), pp.93~124 (2008), 대한언어학회
  69. Lee, Hong-Bae, "Notes on pronouns, reflexives, and pronominalization", Language Research, 12, pp.253~265 (1976)
  70. Lee, Hye-Ran, "A feature-based account of long-distance anaphora" (1997), Hankook Publisher
  71. Lee, Ik-Hwan, "Pronominal anaphora in Korean", Language Research, 14, pp.63~99 (1978)
  72. 이정식, "A Verb-Initial Single Clause Analysis of Right-dislocated Constructions in Korean", 현대문법연구, 57(57), pp.127~157 (2009), 현대문법학회
  73. 이정식, "Some Loopholes of the Double Clause Approach to the Right Dislocated Construction in Korean?", 현대문법연구, 63(63), pp.113~146 (2011), 현대문법학회
  74. Manzini, Maria Rita, "Parameters, binding theory, and learnability", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.413~444 (1987)
  75. Moon, Seung-Cheol, "An optimality approach to long distance anaphor", 박사, pp.1995
  76. O'Grady, William, "The syntax of Korean anaphora", Language Research, 20, pp.121~138 (1984)
  77. Park, Sung-Hyuk, "Parametrizing the theory of binding : The implication of caki in Korean", Language Research, 22, pp.229~254 (1986)
  78. Pollard, Carl, "Anaphors in English and the scope of the binding theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261~305 (1992)
  79. Pollard, Carl, "Long-distance reflexives" (2001), Academic Press
  80. Reinhart, Tanya, "Coreference and bound anaphora : A restatement of the anaphora question", Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, pp.47~88 (1983)
  81. Reinhart, Tanya, "Long-distance anaphora", pp.283~321 (1991), Cambridge University Press
  82. Reinhart, Tanya, "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.595~652 (1993)
  83. Reuland, Eric, "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. I", pp.260~283 (2006), Blackwell Publishing
  84. Reuland, Eric, "Anaphora and language design" (2011), MIT Press
  85. Sells, Peter, "Aspects of logophoricity", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.445~481 (1987)
  86. Shim Joo, Yanghee, "Argument structure, prominence relations, and reflexivity in Korean and English", Studies in Generative Grammar, 5, pp.507~530 (1995)
  87. 송홍기, "A Minimalist Analysis of Xo Reflexivization in Chinese and Korean", 생성문법연구, 14(3), pp.375~396 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
  88. Sportiche, Dominique, "Binding theory-Structure sensitivity of referential dependencies", Lingua, 130, pp.187~208 (2013)
  89. Yang, Dong-Whee, "Topicalization and relativization in Korean" (1975), Pan Korea Book
  90. Yang, Dong-Whee, "Control and binding in Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 7, pp.257~283 (1982)
  91. Yang, Dong-Whee, "The extended binding theory of anaphors", Language Research, 14, pp.169~192 (1983)
  92. Yang, Dong-Whee, "The dual property of anaphors", Language Research, 27, pp.407~436 (1991)
  93. Korean linguistics 16, "Japanese", pp.2007, Yoon, James Hye-Suk
  94. Yoon, Jeong-Me, "Long-distance anaphors in Korean and their crosslinguistic implications", CLS, 25, pp.479~495 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

한국어 재귀사 ‘자기’의 속성엄홍준한국언어학회 · 언어2014 · 제39권 제4호한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근허세문사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2014 · 제70호‘자기’ 재검토: 엄홍준(2014), 허세문(2014)에 답한다최기용한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2015 · 제25권 제4호A Presuppositional Approach to Binding in Korean, with the Focus on Locally Bound Caki조진우한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2025 · 제35권 제3호“-self”와 “자기”의 화용적 지시성에 관한 연구오명기언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2010 · 제52호Pronouns, Reflexives, and Sloppy Identity강남길대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2009 · 제51권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Bare Fragment Answers as Elliptical Pseudoclefts윤정회pp. 365-384Bound Noun swu in Korean김태식pp. 385-406Gapping: A Movement Plus Ellipsis Analysis김영명, 장영준pp. 407-428On the Syntactic Condition for Embedded Imperatives이혜란, 박종언pp. 429-454Phase-head Initiated Structure Building: Its Implications for Feature-Inheritance, Transfer and Internal Merge심재영pp. 455-474
원문 보기