『三國遺事』 소재 <調信>의 교과서 번역 검토
Review on the Translation of <Cho Shin (調信)>, a Literary Material of 『Samgukyusa (三國遺事)』, in Textbooks
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The basics of desirable literature education is to select good literary works, translate them and then build a bridge of appreciation that contributes to their significant growth. Especially because classical literature has different background in various aspects from language issue to historical base that produced a literary work, these kind of works must be conducted. To make right education on the classical literary works written in Chinese, they should be, first of all, translated properly as to transfer the meaning and nuance of the characters themselves or their implications in the original texts so that they may be easily accepted by contemporary students. On top of this, some degree of paraphrasing should be carried out according to academic level of middle and high school students. Only when text books contain the literary materials that have gone through such process strictly, they might have a foundation to understand and appreciate them correctly. This paper reviewed, on <Cho Shin (調信)>, a literary material of 『Samgukyusa (三國遺事)』, an issue whether the translations of the literary works contained in text books satisfied such requirements. The result showed not so much error in the translation of <Cho Shin (調信)>. However, there were not so little part that did not translate them correctly enough to fully reveal the meanings of original texts nor trim the contents to be well understood by students. Particularly, there were many parts deemed to be wrongly described from the viewpoints of context or logic. Considering the fact that such translation of the literary works can hinder teachers and students to read smoothly and understand or appreciate them delicately, this is an important issue that they should be revised or complemented.
Abstract
The basics of desirable literature education is to select good literary works, translate them and then build a bridge of appreciation that contributes to their significant growth. Especially because classical literature has different background in various aspects from language issue to historical base that produced a literary work, these kind of works must be conducted. To make right education on the classical literary works written in Chinese, they should be, first of all, translated properly as to transfer the meaning and nuance of the characters themselves or their implications in the original texts so that they may be easily accepted by contemporary students. On top of this, some degree of paraphrasing should be carried out according to academic level of middle and high school students. Only when text books contain the literary materials that have gone through such process strictly, they might have a foundation to understand and appreciate them correctly. This paper reviewed, on <Cho Shin (調信)>, a literary material of 『Samgukyusa (三國遺事)』, an issue whether the translations of the literary works contained in text books satisfied such requirements. The result showed not so much error in the translation of <Cho Shin (調信)>. However, there were not so little part that did not translate them correctly enough to fully reveal the meanings of original texts nor trim the contents to be well understood by students. Particularly, there were many parts deemed to be wrongly described from the viewpoints of context or logic. Considering the fact that such translation of the literary works can hinder teachers and students to read smoothly and understand or appreciate them delicately, this is an important issue that they should be revised or complemented.
참고문헌 (10)
- 하윤섭, "고전문학교육의 한 사례와 자성적 제언: 최치원의 <秋夜雨中>․<題伽倻山讀書堂>을 중심으로", 한국어문교육, 15, pp.146~ (2014), 고려대학교 한국어문교육연구소
- 이남호, "교과서에 실린 문학작품을 어떻게 가르칠 것인가", pp.318~319 (2001), 현대문학
- 一然, "삼국유사" (1994), 을유문화사
- 一然, "삼국유사 2" (2006), 솔
- 장효현, "校勘本 韓國漢文小說: 傳奇小說" (2007), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원
- 一然, "(點校) 三國遺事", pp.180~181 (2009), 고려대학교출판부
- 연세대학교 허사사전편찬실, "허사대사전" (2001), 성보사
- 李圭景, "五洲衍文長箋散稿(고전간행회본 권38) 인사편 1 인사류 1", pp.11~
- 성백효, "周易傳義(下)", pp.543~ (1998), 전통문화연구회
- 조현우, "<洛山二大聖 觀音 正趣 調信>의 은유적 이해", 한국고전연구, 11, pp.204~ (2005), 한국고전연구학회
