본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고전 공리주의에서 ‘질적 쾌락주의’의 수용문제

The Issue of Acceptance of “Qualitative Hedonism” in Classical Utilitarianism

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

고전 공리주의의 전개과정에서 밀(John S. Mill)의 이른바 ‘질적 쾌락주의(qualitative hedonism)’는 실로 오랫동안 뜨거운 논쟁의 대상이었다. 논쟁의 역사가 긴 만큼 찬반 양측의 논리는 결코 상대방에게 밀리지 않는 것처럼 보인다. 그것의 흐름은 크게 두 가지로 압축될 수 있다고 본다. 먼저 밀을 반대하는 측에서는 그의 질적 쾌락주의가 일관성의 문제를 야기할 수 있는 것으로 본다. 그들은 밀이 쾌락을 평가할 때 ‘양’이 아닌 ‘질’을 평가기준으로 삼은 것은 벤담(Jeremy Bentham)의 순수 쾌락주의를 심각하게 훼손하는 결과를 낳았다고 주장한다. 이에 반해 밀을 옹호하는 측에서는 그의 질적 쾌락주의가 벤담의 쾌락주의(hedonism)와 아리스토텔레스의 행복주의(eudaimonism)를 통합한 결과로 볼 것을 제안한다. 이들에 따르면 밀이 다소 혼란스럽게 보이는 것은 예컨대, 벤담의 형식과 아리스토텔레스의 내용이 뒤섞여 있는 가운데 각각의 측면이 비대칭적으로 나타나는 경우가 많기 때문이다. 그런 만큼 우리는 밀의 입장을 좀 더 포괄적으로 이해하기 위한 새로운 관점의 정립이 필요할 것이라고 본다. 이처럼 밀의 질적 쾌락주의는 조금만 세심하게 살펴보면 그동안 제기된 많은 오해들을 불식시키고도 남을 여러 가지 사색의 단초들을 함축하고 있다. 이 논문은 밀의 질적 쾌락주의가 안고 있는 이론적 한계를 지적함과 동시에 그것의 실천적 의미를 강조하고 싶은 하나의 시론임을 미리 밝혀 두고자 한다.

Abstract

The so-called “qualitative hedonism” of John S. Mill, as proposed in the process of deployment of the classical utilitarianism, was indeed a topic of heated debates among the scholars of ethics for a long time. The logic of both sides: the pros and cons, as the history is long, does not cede to one another. It can be asserted that the flow of the debates can be compressed broadly into two types. The side that opposes Mill appears to assert that an issue of consistency can be brought about by his qualitative hedonism. They argue that the fact that Mill used “quality” and not “quantity” as an evaluation criterion for pleasure has caused a result of seriously undermining the pure hedonism of Jeremy Bentham. In contrast, the side that defends Mill interprets that his hedonism is the result of integrating Bentham’s hedonism and Aristotle’s eudaimonism. The reason why Mill’s hedonism appears somewhat chaotic is -- depending on the written works -- that these two elements appear as being asymmetrical. As such is the case, we should not give up our efforts of trying to understand Mill properly. If one examines meticulously his writings, various clues for contemplations, which can more than dispel those misconceptions proposed so far, can be discovered. The author of this paper wishes to clarify in advance that this paper is merely an essay that attempts to overcome the theoretical limits embodied in Mill’s qualitative hedonism and to highlight their practical meaning.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Bentham, Jeremy, "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation" (1823), The Clarendon Press
  2. Bradley, F. H, "Ethical Studies" (1988), Oxford University Press
  3. Crisp, Roger, "Routledge Guidebooks to Mill on Utilitarianism" (1997), Routledge
  4. Donner, Wendy, "Liberal Self: J ohn Stuart Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy" (1991), Cornell University Press
  5. Edwards, Rem, "Pleasures and Pains: A Theory of Qualitative Hedonism" (1979), Cornell University Press
  6. Hutcheson, Francis, "A System of Moral Philosophy" (1968), Augustus M. Kelley
  7. Moore, G. E., "Principia Ethica" (1976), Cambridge University Press
  8. Sidgwick, Henry, "The Methods of Ethics" (1966), Dover
  9. 서병훈, "존 스튜어트 밀 공리주의" (2007), 책세상
  10. 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학" (2006), 이제이북스
  11. 제레미 벤담, "도덕과 입법의 원리서설" (2011), 나남
  12. 최명관, "존 스튜어트 밀 자서전" (1983), 서광사
  13. Brink, David O., "Mill’s Deliberative Utilitarianism", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21 (1992)
  14. Dahl, Norman O, "Is Mill’s Hedonism Inconsistent?, In American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph Series(No. 7), Studies in Ethics" (1973), Basil Blackwell
  15. Donner, Wendy, "John Stuart Mil’s Concept of Utility", Dialogue, ⅩⅫ(3) (1983)
  16. Donner, Wendy, "Mill’s Theory of Value, In The Blackwell guides to Mill’s Utilitarianism" (2006), Blackwell publishing
  17. Downie, R. S, "Mill on Pleasure and Self-Development", The Philosophical Quarterly, 16 (1966)
  18. Fletcher, Guy, "The Consistency of Qualitative Hedonism and the Value of(at Least Some) Malicious Pleasures", Utilitas, 20(4) (2008)
  19. Gibbs, Benjamin, "Higher and Lower Pleasures", Philosophy, LXI (1986)
  20. Grote, John, "An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy" (1990), Deighton, Bell, And Co.
  21. Gustaf Arrhenius, "Millian Superiorities", Utilitas, 17(2) (2005)
  22. Hauskeller, Michael, "No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures", Utilitas, ~
  23. Hoag, Robert W., "Mill’s Conception of Happiness as an Inclusive End", Journal of the History of Philosophy, 25 (1987)
  24. Hoag, Robert W., "J. S. Mill’s Language of Pleasure", Utilitas, 4(2) (1992)
  25. Long, Roderick T, "Mill’s Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character", Utilitas, 4(2) (1992)
  26. Mandelbaum, Maurice, "On Interpreting Mill’s Utilitarianism", Journal of the History of Philosophy, Ⅵ (1968)
  27. Mothersill, Mary, "Hedonism and the ‘Lower’ Pleasures", The Journal of Philosophy, LIV (1957)
  28. Mill, John Stuart, "Utilitarianism, In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill" (1969), University of Toronto Press
  29. Mill, John Stuart, "Autobiography, CW, vol.Ⅰ", ~
  30. Mill, John Stuart, "On Liberty, CW, vol.xiii", ~
  31. Mill, John Stuart, "On Genius, CW, vol.Ⅰ.", ~
  32. Mill, John Stuart, "Grote’s Plato, CW, vol.xi", ~
  33. Mill, John Stuart, "The Protagoras, CW, vol.xi", ~
  34. Mill, John Stuart, "Bentham, CW, vol.Ⅹ", ~
  35. Riley, Jonathan, "On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure", Utilitas, 5(2) (1993)
  36. Riley, Jonathan, "Is Qualitative Hedonism Incoherent?", Utilitas, 11(3) (1999)
  37. Riley, Jonathan, "Interpreting Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism", The Philosophy Quarterly, 53(212) (2003)
  38. Riley, Jonathan, "Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part Ⅰ", Utilitas, 20(3) (2008)
  39. Riley, Jonathan, "Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part Ⅱ", Utilitas, 21(2) (2009)
  40. Ryberg, Jesper, "Higher and Lower Pleasures –Doubts on Justification", Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 5
  41. Saunders, Ben, "J. S. Mill’s Conception of Utility", Utilitas, 22(1) (2010)
  42. Scarre, Geoffrey, "Epicurus as a Forerunner of Utilitarianism", Utilitas, 6(2) (1994)
  43. Singer, Marcus G., "Mill’s Stoic Conception of Happiness and Pragmatic Conception of Utility", Philosophy, 75(291) (2000)
  44. Walter, Edward, "Mill on Happiness", Journal of Value Inquiry, 16 (1982)
  45. Williams, Geraint, "The Greek Origins of J. S. Mill’s Happiness", Utilitas, 8(1) (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)