한ㆍ중 대상 이동 동사의 낱말밭 대조 연구
A Study on Comparison of Word Field of Korean and Chinese Theme-Movement Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyze each word field of Korean and Chinese theme-movement verbs and identify properties of segmental aspects of Korean and Chinese word fields. Korean or Chinese theme-movement verbs highly depend on where their meanings focus on, among a starting point, a movement process and a reaching point. A majority of Korean or Chinese theme-movement verbs focus their meanings on reaching points, and they are segmented in various ways, according to the reaching aspects or result conditions or movement aspects. Besides, vocabularies are distinguished depending on reaching points and semantic properties of movement objects, even they have similar motions. In other words, they are variously distinguished depending on characteristics of reaching points of objects, that is, obedience objects, a means of transport and animate things. On the other hands, in some cases, similar vocabularies in Korean are differentiated by the quality of [+honorific] between subjects and reaching points, however, Chinese words have no this distinction system. Vocabularies in Chinese are distinguished by selectional restrictions of reaching points or objects in more various ways than in Korean, since in some cases, one Korean word corresponds to several Chinese words.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze each word field of Korean and Chinese theme-movement verbs and identify properties of segmental aspects of Korean and Chinese word fields. Korean or Chinese theme-movement verbs highly depend on where their meanings focus on, among a starting point, a movement process and a reaching point. A majority of Korean or Chinese theme-movement verbs focus their meanings on reaching points, and they are segmented in various ways, according to the reaching aspects or result conditions or movement aspects. Besides, vocabularies are distinguished depending on reaching points and semantic properties of movement objects, even they have similar motions. In other words, they are variously distinguished depending on characteristics of reaching points of objects, that is, obedience objects, a means of transport and animate things. On the other hands, in some cases, similar vocabularies in Korean are differentiated by the quality of [+honorific] between subjects and reaching points, however, Chinese words have no this distinction system. Vocabularies in Chinese are distinguished by selectional restrictions of reaching points or objects in more various ways than in Korean, since in some cases, one Korean word corresponds to several Chinese words.
참고문헌 (30)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 김광해, "유의어·반의어 사전" (1993), 한샘
- 김민수, "國語意味論" (1981), 일조각
- 김윤신, "한국어 대상 이동 동사의 두 가지 의미 구조 : 교체형과 비교체형", 한국어 의미학, 17, pp.207~229 (2005), 한국어의미학회
- 김응모, "국어 이동 자동사 낱말밭 1" (1993), 서광학술자료사
- 김현주, "국어 대우법 어미의 형태화 연구", 박사, pp.2010
- 남경완, "국어 용언의 의미 분석" (2008), 태학사
- 남승호, "한국어 이동 동사의 의미구조와 논항교체", 어학연구, 39(1) (2003), 서울대 언어교육원
- 남영신, "우리말 분류사전" (1989), 한강문화사
- 노대규, "국어 의미론 연구" (1988), 국학자료원
- 董大年, "现代汉语分类大辞典" (2007), 上海辞书出版社
- 呂春燕, "中日移動動詞的認知語義學對照研究", 박사, pp.2009
- 李武英, "現代韓中中韓詞典", 外語教學與研究 (2004)
- 李雪, "英漢移動動詞詞彙化模式的對比研究", 西安外國語大學學報 (2010)
- 민족문화연구원, "고려대 한국어대사전" (2009), 고려대 민족문화연구원
- 배해수, "한국어 분절구조 이해: 이론과 방법과 실제" (2005), 푸른사상
- 李東熙, "國語 對象移動動詞의 연구", 석사, pp.1992
- 임지룡, "한국어 이동 사건의 어휘화 양상", 현대문법연구, 20 (1999), 현대분법학회
- 전수태, "국어 이동동사의 의미 연구" (2009), 박이정
- 정연주, "대상 이동 동사의 낱말밭 연구", 어문논집, (63), pp.77~111 (2011), 민족어문학회
- 中國社會科學院語言研究所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典" (2005), 商務印書館
- 채희락, "이동동사의 정의와 분류", 현대문법연구, 15 (1999)
- 최창렬, "國語意味構造硏究" (1980), 한신문화사
- 최호철, "현대 국어 감탄사의 분절 구조 연구: 감정 감탄사를 중심으로, In 한국어와 모국어 정신" (2000), 국학자료원
- 崔鎬哲, "현대 국어 敍述語의 의미 연구 : 義素 設定을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1993
- Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, "Verb, In Morphologie", pp.Mouton de Gruyter, An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation
- Choi, S., "Learning to express motion in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns", Cognition, 41, pp.83~121 (1991)
- Fillmore, C. J., "Some problems for case grammar, In Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, 22nd Annual Roundtable" (1971), Georgetown University Press
- Gruber, J. S., "Studies in Lexical Relations", 박사, pp.1965
- "Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms, In Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol III", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press