본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중등학교에서 Donald W. Oliver와 James P. Shaver의 법리적 교수전략을 활용한 공공 정책에 관한 정치적 논쟁 가르치기

Teaching Political Controversy Through Donald W. Oliver and James P. Shaver’s Jurisprudential Teaching Strategy in Secondary Schools

배영민
교과교육연구소 (Research Institute of Curriculum & Instruction)|2022.08|교과교육학연구 (Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction)|제26권 제4호|pp. 346-366|DOI 10.24231/rici.2022.26.4.346

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

자유주의Liberalism사회과교수전략Teaching StrategySocial Studies법적 결의론개인의 존엄Legal CasuistryIndividual Dignity

초록

이 연구는 Donald W. Oliver와 James P. Shaver(1966)가 하버드 사회과 프로젝트에서 개발한 공공 정책을 둘러싼 정치적 논쟁을 분석하는 ‘법리적 교수전략’을 고찰한다. 우리가 법리적 교수전략을 제대로 이해하기 위해서는 법리적 교육과정의 사상적 기반을 알아야 한다. 그래서 이 연구는 먼저, 법리적 교육과정의 사상적 기반이 되는 고전적 자유주의 사상을살펴본다. 그런 다음, 법리적 교수전략의 법리적 토대가 되는 궁극의 가치로서 개인의 존엄과 일반적 가치들, 정치적 논쟁 분석의 윤리적 원리로서 민주적 입헌주의, 그리고 정치적·윤리적 문제들의 해결 방법으로서 법적 결의론(legal casuistry)을 각각 논의한다. 이를 바탕으로, 이 논문은 공산주의 서적의 검열을 예로 들어 법리적 교수전략의 적용 사례를 상세하게 설명한다. 또한, 법리적 교수전략이 지니는 의의와 한계를 논의한다. 그리고 결론에서 원론적인 수준에서 법리적 교수전략을 우리나라의 중등학교 사회과 수업에 확산하기 위한 몇 가지 과제들을 언급한다.

Abstract

This study examines the jurisprudential teaching strategy that analyzes the political controversy over public policies proposed by Donald W. Oliver and James P. Shaver (1966) in the Harvard Social Studies Project. In order to properly understand the jurisprudential teaching strategy, it is required to understand the ideological basis of the jurisprudential curriculum. So, this study first examines the classical liberal ideas that are the basis of the jurisprudential curriculum. Then, the discussion is made on individual dignity as the ultimate value and general values, democratic constitutionalism, and legal casuistry that serve as the jurisprudential basis for the jurisprudential teaching strategy. Based on this, this paper explains in detail the application of the jurisprudential teaching strategy, taking censorship on communist books as an example. In addition, the significance and limitations of the jurisprudential teaching strategy are discussed. In conclusion, it suggests several tasks to spread the jurisprudential teaching strategy in social studies classes in secondary schools.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Arras, J. D, "Methods in bioethics: The way we reason now" (2017), Oxford University Press
  2. 배영민, "쟁점 중심 사회과 수업에 적합한 평가체제 모색 - 2022 개정 사회과 교육과정 개발에 즈음하여-", 사회과교육, 60(2), pp.93~114 (2021), 한국사회과교육연구학회
  3. Banks, J. A, "An Introduction to multicultural education" (2013), Pearson, Allyn & Bacon
  4. Barak, A, "Human dignity: The constitutional value and the constitutional right" (2015), Cambridge University Press
  5. Blasi, V, "The Oxford handbook of freedom of speech", pp.20~42 (2021), Oxford University Press
  6. Dewey, J, "How we think" (1997), Dover Publications
  7. Dworkin, R, "Is democracy possible here? Principles for a new political debate" (2006), Princeton University Press
  8. Ellsworth, P. C, "The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning", pp.685~704 (2005), Cambridge University Press
  9. Engle, S. H., "Education for democratic citizenship: Decision making in the social studies" (1988), Teachers College Press
  10. Etzioni, A., "Communitarianism revisited", Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(3), pp.241~260 (2014)
  11. Etzioni, A, "Happiness is the wrong metric : A liberal communitarian response to populism" (2018), Springer Open
  12. Etzioni, A, "Law and society in a populist age: Balancing individual rights and the common good" (2018), Bristol University Press
  13. Fallace, T. D., "The origins of classroom deliberation:Democratic education in the shadow of totalitarianism, 1938-1960", Harvard Educational Review, 86(4), pp.506~526 (2016)
  14. Francis, A. T., "Diffusing the social studies wars: The Harvard Social Studies Project, 1957−1972", American Educational History Journal, 41(2), pp.373~392 (2014)
  15. Gonzales, M. H., "Rights and obligations in civic education : A content analysis of the National Standards for Civics and Government", Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(1), pp.109~128 (2001)
  16. Gonzales, M. H., "Variations of citizenship education : A content analysis of rights, obligations, and participation concepts in high school civic textbooks", Theory and Research in Social Education, 32(3), pp.301~325 (2004)
  17. Gutmann, A, "Diversity and citizenship education:Global perspective", pp.71~96 (2004), Jossey-Bass
  18. Henning, M. B., "Educating about social issues in the 20th and 21st centuries:A critical annotated bibliography Volume 1", pp.135~148 (2012), Information Age Publishing
  19. Hunt, M. P., "Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and social understanding" (1968), Harper & Row
  20. "Korea is as wealthy as Western Europe, but severe income and wealth inequality" (2021)[URL]
  21. "Supreme Court rejects application for injunction to ban sale and distribution of 'Kim Il-sung's memoirs'" (2022)[URL]
  22. Jonsen, A. R., "Casuistry: An alternative or complement to principle?", Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(3), pp.237~251 (1995)
  23. "‘Punitive damages’ press law, 56.5% in favor vs 35.5% against" (2021)[URL]
  24. "The Constitutional Court "Penalty for conscientious objection to military service is constitutional, but it is necessary to introduce alternative service"" (2018)[URL]
  25. 이광성, "논쟁문제의 해결 과정에서 유추의 필요성과 역할", 시민교육연구, 50(4), pp.129~144 (2018), 한국사회과교육학회[DOI]
  26. Direction and tasks for the promotion of democratic citizenship education in elementary and secondary schools, "Lee, S.", KEDI, ~, pp.Report No. RR 2019-04 (2019)
  27. "The Constitutional Court sought advice, “Is the death penalty effective in reducing heinous crimes such as murder?”" (2022)[URL]
  28. Lockwood, A. L., "A critical view of values clarification", Teachers College Record, 77(1), pp.35~50 (1975)
  29. Lukes, S., "The meanings of “individualism”", Journal of the History of Ideas, 31(1), pp.45~66 (1971)
  30. Myrdal, G., "Democracy, pluralism, and the social studies: Readings and commentary, An approach to curriculum decisions in the social studies", pp.86~97 (1968), Houghton Mifflin Company
  31. Newmann, F. M., "The analysis of public controversy:New focus for social studies", The School Review, 73(4), pp.410~434 (1965)
  32. Newmann, F. M., "Clarifying public controversy: An approach to social studies" (1970), Little, Brown, and Company
  33. 노희정, "가치 갈등 해결 수업모형의 한계와 그 개선 방안", 도덕교육연구, 24(2), pp.111~134 (2012), 한국도덕교육학회
  34. 오연주, "하버드 사회과 프로젝트의 법리적 접근법의 이론적 기초: ‘공공쟁점’, ‘법리적 접근’, 그리고 ‘법리적 교수’에 대한 오개념을 넘어", 시민교육연구, 53(4), pp.219~245 (2021), 한국사회과교육학회[DOI]
  35. Oliver, D. W., "The selection of content in the social studies", Harvard Educational Review, 28, pp.271~300 (1957)
  36. Oliver, D. W., "Harvard University: A curriculum based on the analysis of public controversy", Social Education, 29(4), pp.220~223 (1965)
  37. Oliver, D. W., "Democracy, pluralism, and the social studies: Readings and commentary, An approach to curriculum decisions in the social studies", pp.97~120 (1968), Houghton Mifflin Company
  38. Oliver, D. W., "Teaching public issues in the secondary school classroom", The Social Studies, 83(3), pp.100~103 (1992)
  39. Oliver, D. W., "Teaching public issues in the high school" (1966), Houghton Mifflin Company
  40. Ryan, A, "A companion to contemporary political philosophy", pp.360~382 (2007), Blackwell Publishing
  41. 설규주, "학교 민주시민교육을 위한 교육원칙 연구 - 한국형 보이텔스바흐 합의를 위한 시론적 제안과 적용 -", 시민교육연구, 52(2), pp.229~260 (2020), 한국사회과교육학회[DOI]
  42. "‘Distortion pointed out’ Kim Ilsung’s memoir, published in Korea as original...Controversy notice" (2021)[URL]
  43. Shaver, J. P., "Rationales for issues-centered social studies education", Social Education, 83(3), pp.95~99 (1992)
  44. "People Power Party, ‘Kim Ilsung's memoirs’ “A false novel... Let's leave it to the people's judgment”" (2021)[URL]
  45. Singh, B. R., "Liberalism, communitarianism and discussion method as a means of reconciling controversial moral issues", Educational Studies, 23(2), pp.169~184 (1997)
  46. Singleton, L. R., "Handbook on teaching social issues", pp.59~65 (1996), National Council for the Social Studies
  47. Sleeter, C. E., "Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender" (2009), John Wiley & Sons Inc
  48. Stanley, W. B, "Curriculum for utopia: Social reconstructionism and critical pedagogy in the postmodern era" (1992), State University of New York Press
  49. Stern, B. S, "Teaching and studying social issues:Major programs and approaches", pp.43~65 (2011), Information Age Publishing
  50. Sunstein, C. R., "On analogical reasoning", Harvard Law Review, 106(3), pp.741~791 (1993)
  51. Sunstein, C. R, "Legal reasoning and political conflict" (2018), Oxford University Press
  52. Ten, C. L, "A companion to contemporary political philosophy", pp.493~502 (2007), Blackwell Publishing
  53. Tremblay, P. R., "The new casuistry", Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 12(3), pp.489~542 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

하버드 사회과 프로젝트의 법리적 접근법의 이론적 기초: ‘공공쟁점’, ‘법리적 접근’, 그리고 ‘법리적 교수’에 대한 오개념을 넘어오연주한국사회과교육학회 · 시민교육연구2021 · 제53권 제4호가치 딜레마 해결 방법으로서 법리적 접근의 의미 - Oliver와 Shaver의 논의를 중심으로 -이태성한국 법과인권교육학회 · 법과인권교육연구2022 · 제15권 제1호논쟁 이슈 교수ㆍ학습에서 교사의 역할추병완한국윤리학회 · 倫理硏究2020 · 제1권 제129호정의(正義), 어떻게 가르칠 것인가?진시원한국법교육학회 · 법교육연구2014 · 제9권 제3호사회과 논쟁문제 수업에서 교사의 정치적 중립성 관련 준거와 교육적 함의구정화교육연구원 · 학교와 수업 연구2024 · 제9권 제2호시민 심의를 위한 건설적 논쟁의 활용 방안최윤정, 추병완

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

Pre-service Elementary and Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Noticing in Teaching Demonstration조미경, 이민희pp. 315-327Rhetorical Strategies of Authorial Presence in L2 English Student Writers’ Research Articles: Use of Hedges and Boosters with Authorial References최연희pp. 328-345코로나19 상황에서 전문적 학습공동체를 통한 학교 수준 체육과 교육과정 개발하기제성준, 박성기pp. 367-379Characteristics of and Changes in the Noticing of Preservice Mathematics Teachers in Backward Design김선희, 이명화pp. 380-396Effects of Video Conferencing and Metaverse Platforms on Korean EFL University Learners’ Self-assessed L2 Speaking, Interaction, Immersion, and Affective Factors이미진, 전유경pp. 397-414
원문 보기