시민 심의를 위한 건설적 논쟁의 활용 방안
A study on utilizing constructive controversy for civic deliberation
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
시민 심의는 의사 결정이라는 목표 달성을 위해 논쟁거리가 되는 공적인 이슈에 대한 상충된 관점을 사려 깊고 심각하게 고려하는 행위다. 시민 심의는 지속 가능한 민주주의의 발전에 필수적인 요소이므로, 시민교육은 학생들의 시민 심의 기술 함양에 초점을 맞추어야 한다. 건설적 논쟁은 시민 심의 기술 함양에 가장 효과적인 교수 방법이다. 학생들은 먼 미래의 시민이 아닌 지금 그리고 여기에서의 학생 시민으로서 건설적 논쟁을 통해 시민 심의에 필요한 다양한 기술을 함양할 수 있다. 이에 이 논문에서 우리는 도덕 교과에서 시민 심의의 중요성을 밝히고, 학생들의 시민 심의 기술 함양을 위해 도덕 수업에서 건설적 논쟁을 활용하는 절차와 조건을 명료하게 제시하였다.
Abstract
Civic deliberation is the act of thoughtful and serious consideration of conflicting views on controversial public issues to achieve the goal of decision-making. As civic deliberation is an essential element in the development of a sustainable democracy, so the purpose of civic education should focus on fostering students' skills for civic deliberation. Constructive controversy is the most effective teaching method for cultivating students' skills for civic deliberation. Through constructive controversy, students who are not as future citizens but as here-and-now student-citizens can cultivate a variety of skills for true civic deliberation. In this article, we articulated the importance of civic deliberation in moral education, and clearly presented the procedures and various conditions of utilizing constructive controversy in moral education to foster students' skills for civic deliberation.
참고문헌 (42)
- 교육부, "도덕과 교육과정" (2015), 교육부
- 김윤경, "논쟁수업에서 도덕과 교사의 역할과 발문에 관한 연구", 도덕윤리과교육, (65), pp.163~188 (2019), 한국도덕윤리과교육학회[DOI]
- 최윤경, "건설적 논쟁의 도덕교육적 함의", 초등도덕교육, (66), pp.1~30 (2019), 한국초등도덕교육학회[DOI]
- 추병완, "건설적 논쟁 수업을 통한 시민교육", pp.37~57 (2020), 한국문화사
- 추병완, "건설적 논쟁 수업이 초등학생의 인성 발달에 미치는 효과", 2019 인성교육 현장연구 결과발표회 자료집, pp.3~36 (2019), 교보교육재단
- 추병완, "건설적 논쟁 수업을 통한 시민교육", pp.59~84 (2020), 한국문화사
- Avery, P. G, "Deliberating controversial public issues as part of civic education", The Social Studies, 104, pp.105~114 (2013)
- Barton, K, "Teaching controversial issues: Where controversial issues really matter", Teaching History, 127, pp.13~19 (2007)
- Bellamy, R, "Citizenship: A very short introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Brice, L, "Deliberative discourse enacted: Task, text, and talk", Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(1), pp.66~87 (2002)
- Bridges, D, "Education, democracy and discussion" (1979), NFER
- Crook, K, "Ethics and law for teachers", pp.129~146 (2007), Thomson Nelson
- Deardon, R. F, "Controversial issues in the curriculum", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13, pp.37~44 (1981)
- Dewey, J, "Liberalism and social action" (1966), Putnam Sons
- Dewey, J, "How we think" (1933), D.C. Heath & Company
- Dworkin, G, "The theory and practice of autonomy" (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Gutmann, A, "Democracy and disagreement" (1996), Harvard University Press
- Gutmann, A, "Democratic education" (1999), Princeton University Press
- Gutmann, A, "Rediscovering the democratic purposes of education", pp.73~90 (2000), University of Kansas Press
- Gutmann, A, "Why deliberative democracy" (2004), princeton University Press
- Hahn, C. L, "Democratic citizenship in schools", pp.48~59 (2012), Dunedin Academic Press
- Hand, M, "Discussing controversial issues in the classroom", Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), pp.614~629 (2012)
- Hess, D, "How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues", Social Education, 69, pp.47~48 (2005)
- 추병완, "4차 산업혁명 시대의 혁신 교수법: 건설적 논쟁의 이론과 실제" (2019), 하우
- Johnson, D. W, "Constructive controversy: The educative power of intellectual conflict", Change, 32(1), pp.28~37 (2000)
- Kymlicka, W, "Contemporary political philosophy" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Lickona, T, "인격교육론" (1998), 백의
- Malikow, M, "Engaging students in controversial issues", Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(3), pp.106~108 (2006)
- McDevitt, M, "Experiments in political socialization: Kids voting USA as a model for civic education reform" (2006), Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement
- Michaels, S, "Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life", Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), pp.283~297 (2008)
- Moore, B. N, "Critical thinking" (2007), McGraw-Hill
- Noddings, N, "Teaching controversial issues: The case for critical thinking and moral commitment in the classroom" (2017), Teachers College Press
- Oulton, C, "Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues", International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), pp.411~423 (2004)
- Oxfam, "Global citizenship guides: Teaching controversial issues" (2006), Oxfam House
- Parker, W. C, "Teaching with and for discussion", Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, pp.273~289 (2001)
- Peterson, A, "Civic republicanism and civic education: The education of citizens" (2011), Palgrave Macmillan
- Pettit, P, "Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Reich, W, "Deliberative democracy in the classroom: A sociological view", Educational Theory, 57(2), pp.187~197 (2007)
- Rubin, B. C, "Laboratories of democracy: A situated perspective on learning social studies in detracked classrooms", Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(1), pp.62~95 (2007)
- Schommer-Aikins, M, "Epistemological beliefs and thinking about everyday controversial issues", The Journal of Psychology, 136(1), pp.5~20 (2002)
- Stradling, T, "The teaching of controversial issues: An evaluation", Educational Review, 36(2), pp.121~129 (1984)
- Valadez, J. M, "Deliberative democracy: Political legitimacy and self-determination in multicultural societies" (2001), Westview Press