LINEと対人場面における接続詞の 出現傾向について
On the appearance tendency of conjunctions in LINE conversations and in personal conversations
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we did a research on casual conversations between young people personally and by LINE, and found out that the conjunctions usage frequency is widely different (in personal conversations, it was 15.3%, and in conversations by LINE, it was 4.1%). As a case study, we did an analysis of the conjunctions “de (sorede)”, “dakara”, “toiuka”, and “demo”, and pointed out that, in conversations by LINE, conjunctions that function as a complement of the previous information, and conjunctions that function as an obligatory logical connective tend to increase. On the other hand, conjunctions that do not function as above tend to decrease. Also, we affirm that the conjunctions usage frequency in LINE conversations is related to the next 2 points: (1) From the point of view of Immediacy and Visibility, the need of keeping the utterance as short as possible causes a decrease of non‐obligatory words. (2) From the point of view of Topic Juxtaposing, the necessity of marking the end of the previous topic decreases, and so does the use of non‐obligatory conjunctions.
Abstract
In this paper, we did a research on casual conversations between young people personally and by LINE, and found out that the conjunctions usage frequency is widely different (in personal conversations, it was 15.3%, and in conversations by LINE, it was 4.1%). As a case study, we did an analysis of the conjunctions “de (sorede)”, “dakara”, “toiuka”, and “demo”, and pointed out that, in conversations by LINE, conjunctions that function as a complement of the previous information, and conjunctions that function as an obligatory logical connective tend to increase. On the other hand, conjunctions that do not function as above tend to decrease. Also, we affirm that the conjunctions usage frequency in LINE conversations is related to the next 2 points: (1) From the point of view of Immediacy and Visibility, the need of keeping the utterance as short as possible causes a decrease of non‐obligatory words. (2) From the point of view of Topic Juxtaposing, the necessity of marking the end of the previous topic decreases, and so does the use of non‐obligatory conjunctions.
참고문헌 (24)
- 有賀千佳子, "対話における接続詞の機能について―"それで"の用法を手がかりに―", 日本語教育, 79, pp.89~101 (1993)
- 五十嵐紀子, "大学生の携帯メール絵文字使用によるメッセージ―その表現と解釈―", Kyushu Communication Studies, 2, pp.1~11 (2004)
- 石黒圭, "逆接の基本的性格と表現価値", 国語学, 198, pp.14~29 (1999)
- 石黒圭, "講義の談話の表現と理解", pp.138~152 (2010), くろしお出版
- 石黒圭, "接続表現のジャンル別出現頻度について", 一橋大学留学生センター紀要, 12, pp.73~85 (2009)
- 市川孝, "国語教育のための文章論概説", pp.51~122 (1978), 教育出版
- 岩澤治美, "逆接の接続詞の用法", 日本語教育, 56, pp.39~50 (1985)
- 岡本能里子, "インタラクションと学習", pp.129~148 (2017), ひつじ書房
- 加納なおみ, "｢打ち言葉｣における句点の役割―日本人の大学生のLINEメッセージを巡る一考察―", お茶の水女子大学人文科学研究, 13, pp.27~40 (2017)
- 桐澤絵里奈, "日本語母語話者の雑談における接続表現の出現傾向", 早稲田日本語研究, 26, pp.25~37 (2017)
- 佐久間まゆみ, "女子大生の日常談話の接続表現", 國文目白, 32, pp.31~48 (1993)
- 白井宏美, "談話の美学―言語研究からの再考―", pp.189~211 (2016), ひつじ書房
- "平成28年情報通信メディアの利用時間と情報行動に関する調査報告書" (2017)[URL]
- 筒井佐代, "雑談の構造分析", pp.1~325 (2012), くろしお出版
- 蓮沼昭子, "対話における｢だから｣の機能", 姫路獨協大学外国語学部紀要, 4, pp.137~153 (1991)
- 平川八尋, "理工系講義に現れる接続表現の分析―教材作成のための基礎資料分析―", 長岡技術科学大学言語･人文科学論集, 5, pp.93~102 (1991)
- 藤村逸子, "言語研究の技法―データの収集と分析―", pp.43~72 (2010), ひつじ書房
- 三宅和子, "ポケベルからケータイ･メールへ－歴史的変遷とその必然性―", 日本語学, 20(10), pp.6~22 (2001)
- 三宅和子, "メディアとことば 2", pp.234~261 (2005), ひつじ書房
- 山本貴昭, "談話における接続詞｢で｣の用法―女性話者の談話を対象として―", 國文学攷, 181, pp.13~27 (2004)
- 吉澤文, "ディスコース･マーカーとしての｢っていうか｣の機能の分析", 日本研究教育年報, 7, pp.39~63 (2003)
- Sacks, H., "A simplest systematic for the organization of turn‐taking for conversation", Language, 50(4), pp.696~735 (1974)
- Schiffrin, D., "Discourse Markers", pp.128~227 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Werry, C., "Computer‐Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross‐Cultural Perspectives", pp.47~63 (1996), John Benjamins Publishing Company